Shouldn't he be "booted" based on the merits of his actions in committing fraud?
Obama should be impeached.
If any Republican pulled his stunt, there'd be riots in the streets calling for impeachment.
True, not true - what I'm saying is that it will NEVER be proven and/or accepted as proven. That's my personal take. So, you move forward under that assumption, and attack the things that are undefensable - his actions since taking office. Maybe that's an argument from a realist perspective vs. an idealist perspective, but I feel like it's the best way to avoid a trap and misdirection. We're talking about the movement and mindset of masses of people, that cannot turn on a dime or stick on a single point. Politics are a sick and lowest common demoninator activity - it's been exposed as such to it's barest elements. To deny this is to put yourself on the sidelines of effectiveness. You can be an idealist, and pull support away from a positive trend, or you can support a positive trend. I understand if being an idealist gives you personal peace, but it will not effect the realities of what WILL happen and the limitation of what you can force to happen.