Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Bachmann in the primaries. What say you guys?
Myself(Vanity)

Posted on 04/29/2011 4:57:43 PM PDT by JosephSmithNAW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last
To: SideoutFred
This is the problem we have as conservatives where we have segment of complete nutjobs that make arguments like this, or think Obama was born in Kenya, etc, etc that it kills us in the court of public opinion.

No, the problem we have as conservatives is that we have a segment of candy-ass appeasers who are ignorant of history.

141 posted on 05/01/2011 5:19:27 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (I'm sick of damn idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

You’re right — Allen West is like Chris Christie, but stronger, more attractive, and Black. He has to be able to handle the Cowboy attacks though, after he put his service automatic next to that detainee’s ear and pulled the trigger to find out where the IED was. *I* think that’s GREAT, and it is probably the main reason I think he has the brass ones to do what needs to be done. Others would find it frightening in one with finger on button. He just has to play it right, don’t apologize, don’t let the media keep asking and asking and asking about it.


142 posted on 05/01/2011 5:21:52 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

No, you miss the point. Free people, as long as they don’t misuse them, should be allowed to own and possess any weapon they desire.


143 posted on 05/01/2011 5:45:13 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
If you don’t need them to hunt, which you clearly don’t, then what do you need full assault weapons for? Hmmm? You don’t need them.

Where is hunting mentioned in the Second Amendment?

It isn't.

It also isn't called the Bill of Needs. It is the Bill of Rights.

You apparently cannot read or reason and don't have a single clue about weapons.

Typical Romneybot.

144 posted on 05/01/2011 5:45:49 PM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
Apparently Eaker and a few others didn’t understand my sarcasm.

Your little wee ignorant ass got busted and now you lie and call it "sarcasm".

LOL!

Maybe you should stay away from "big boy" discussions.

145 posted on 05/01/2011 5:49:23 PM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Americans did not agree to have obama as their obama as their President. Traitors, American haters, and people that voted who happen to live in the United States agreed to have obama as their President. I despise them for inflicting him on me and hope that they get a belly full of him.


146 posted on 05/01/2011 5:50:47 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred; PSYCHO-FREEP
It just dawned on me that neither of you knew what was in the weapon ban and were unable to educate yourselves on the subject so you might not have ever read the Second Amendment so here it is:

Second Amendment

147 posted on 05/01/2011 6:00:42 PM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: sport

Wow...really, check yourself into a clinic or something. I hated the results as well, but he is our POTUS until he isn’t. Americans elected him and as Americans we can elect someone else, but rest assured he is the POTUS and elected by the American people. To not respect that, quite frankly, is UNAMERICAN by you


148 posted on 05/01/2011 8:26:37 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: sport

Wow...really, check yourself into a clinic or something. I hated the results as well, but he is our POTUS until he isn’t. Americans elected him and as Americans we can elect someone else, but rest assured he is the POTUS and elected by the American people. To not respect that, quite frankly, is UNAMERICAN by you


149 posted on 05/01/2011 8:26:49 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: sport

Oh sure, it’s a great idea to have every Tom and Jane on the street have a nuclear suitcase weapon, you know as long as they are cool about not misusing it. Maybe a stinger missile or a Anthrax for everyone, too.

Wow...just wow.


150 posted on 05/01/2011 8:32:54 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

Right..as a small business owner, anti-union, pro tea party member, I sure fit the mold of a communist. You got me (heavy sarcasm).


151 posted on 05/01/2011 8:35:59 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

It just dawned on me that common sense doesn’t fit into your dogma. There is no need for SOME of these weapons to be in the hands of non-military personnel. Taking away some of these assault weapons will do NOTHING to your personal rights to arm yourself, hunt, defend your property, etc. Nothing.


152 posted on 05/01/2011 8:38:29 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
I don't care what you call yourself.

I doubt you really know what you believe.

From your insipid posts on this topic, it's obvious you're way over your head here.

153 posted on 05/02/2011 9:00:45 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (I'm sick of damn idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
It just dawned on me that common sense doesn’t fit into your dogma.

"Common sense" gun control, where have I heard that loaded phrase? Oh that's right from the communists who want to disarm the citizenry.

You're just another concern troll.

154 posted on 05/02/2011 9:02:38 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (I'm sick of damn idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Once again Fred it is the BILL OF RIGHTS not BILL OF NEEDS.

The word “infringed” should mean the same in Liberalville as it does in Texas.

You still haven’t looked at the ban bill have you?

For that matter you still haven’t read or cannot understand the Second Amendment.

Your fear of guns should not ever affect anyone’s RIGHT to own them.


155 posted on 05/02/2011 9:34:23 AM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

Actually I have no desire to disarm the country at all. I OWN A GUN...why would I want to disarm myself? Good grief.

That being said, I don’t think citizens should have military style assault weapons. You disagree. That doesn’t make me a communist or you the supreme commander.

We’ll agree to disagree.


156 posted on 05/02/2011 1:11:01 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Eaker, I have no fear of guns...I own one. Maybe you should get your facts straight before pretending to know where people are on the subject.

Incidentally, at what point is it enough? Stinger missile? Flame thrower? Etc? Do you draw the line anywhere?


157 posted on 05/02/2011 1:33:20 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

LOL!

The old should everyone be allowed to have a nuclear bomb in their basement argument.

I don’t know about a stinger missile but legally there is no problem with me owning a cannon or flame thrower or a full auto weapon. See the assault weapon ban doesn’t apply to these items just semi auto’s like a .22 rifle.

This is what I mean by you needing to do some research.


158 posted on 05/02/2011 3:01:22 PM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

It’s probably a silly argument, but I’d tend to think “arms” should be stuff one person can reasonably be expected to be able to carry. Arms, carry. See?

Like I said, it’s probably silly.


159 posted on 05/02/2011 3:08:53 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

What you said but to be equal to what a front line infantry man is expected to carry on today’s battlefield.

Not a single shot .22 for hunting rabbits like gun grabbers want it to mean.

Actually, “not to be infringed” really does mean what it says.


160 posted on 05/02/2011 3:17:03 PM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson