Might help if this was written in English.
I followed the link and here is an excerpt from a poster there named Mannfm11:
“MERS is a total screw up by the banks. It has no standing to convey title. contrary to what the banks allege. It has shown absolutely no standing of ownership in any paper it holds. There is no evidence that it ever paid a dime at closing to own the deed. It has shown no evidence it received any payment since the mortgage was in force. It does not at this time own any interest in the mortgages it holds, thus has no power of assignment to foreclose.”
It means that MERS, the phony system that claims to have title to deeds of mortgages across this country, in fact maybe most mortgages since 2000, does not have the legal standing to foreclose on a home.
Basically, this was an appeals court rejecting an appeal by MERS to a case they lost.
The case originally started as Groves bringing a case saying that the deed of trust on her property was invalid and she asked the court to grant a quiet title to her property. The county records showed she owned the property, and the deed of trust under which MERS asserted an interest in the property that interfered with Groves’ title. Groves argued that the deed of trust was invalid and had no force in the law.
MERS lost the case, in part because they didn’t show up in court, and the court granted her a quiet title.
MERS then files this restricted appeal, because they didn’t participate in the trial court case, and the appeals court issued this finding that the trial court was correct in their judgement.
MERS and whatever lender they were acting as “nominee” for on this property are SOL. Groves now has the property free and clear.