Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin splits with neocon advisers
Politico ^ | 05/03/2011 | Ben Smith

Posted on 05/03/2011 8:24:13 AM PDT by Hawk720

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-184 next last
To: Captain Kirk
She’s as bloodthirsty as they come...

Man you people are really out there.

121 posted on 05/03/2011 10:52:51 AM PDT by McGruff (When it comes to Obama's birth certificate. Trust, but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: unseen1
No, I think international agreements lived up to are more important than either. It is like the men Reagan got killed in Lebanon, I would never have put them there to get killed.

And I do not know of any agreement we have with Syria and are Iran. Had I been in charge at the start of the Iraq war, the ninth ID would have come into Iraq from Israel and they would have stopped when the hit Kabul Afghanistan. And the Israeli air force would have been their ground sweepers.

122 posted on 05/03/2011 10:55:02 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]



I’m Floored
That You Haven’t Donated Yet!


Sponsoring FReepers leapfrog0202 and another person will contribute $10
Each time a new monthly donor signs up!
Get more bang for your buck
Sign up today

Lazamataz! We miss you.

123 posted on 05/03/2011 10:55:26 AM PDT by TheOldLady (Almost as evil as the Freeper Criminal Mastermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: unseen1
"ROFL....we don't have a statue of limitation on murder in this country."

When has Muammar Gaddafi been indicted for murder in a US court of law?

bin Laden, OTOH, has been indicted NUMEROUS times in US court - first in 1998, and several times after 9/11. Again, where is the Congressional authorization for the bombing of Muammar Gaddafi?

124 posted on 05/03/2011 10:57:16 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Putting boots on the ground to scoop up Gaddafi is a far different task than putting boots on the ground to nation build.

I believe if I remember correctly, she was against the latter and for the former.

125 posted on 05/03/2011 10:57:55 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

“She’s as bloodthirsty as they come....”

Hyperbole much?


126 posted on 05/03/2011 10:59:49 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans - Don't read their lips. Watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I think Treaties should be lived up too. side agreements between POTUS and othe rleaders should not be. unless the POTUS can get the majority of the Senate to agree to his/her international agreements it should be understood the agreement lasts until that POTUS that mad eit leaves office. We do not want to tie America not its national interests to that of the personal interest of a POTUS.

Treaties need to be kept the rest don’t.

I agree with your battle plan.


127 posted on 05/03/2011 10:59:59 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: unseen1; OldDeckHand
So you would be against the OBL mission Obama just ordered to kill OBL? Obama put boots on the ground in Pakistain you know.

Yup, that's certainly an example of boots on the ground that has nothing to do with nation building (in Pakistan).

128 posted on 05/03/2011 11:02:47 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: waterhill; ixtl
(((ping))) for later.

RUN SARAH RUN!

and then we will

DRILL BABY DRILL!

.
129 posted on 05/03/2011 11:03:48 AM PDT by Envisioning ( Call me a racist................, one more time......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I really do not believe it is either or, it is maybe, could be, I”ll get back to you on that when I decide what I think. There that covers the current Palin position on Libya.


130 posted on 05/03/2011 11:04:27 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

oh so you are one of those that think we should treat these american murderers who are noncitizens under the court of law? I see. No wonder you don’t like Palin. next you will be calling for the closing of Gitmo and holding court in NYC for KSM....

I guess those murdering pirates off the coast of somlia should also be arrested if and only if they are indicted for their murders....


131 posted on 05/03/2011 11:05:38 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I”ll get back to you on that when I decide what I think.

That sounds more like Mitch Daniels on Egypt.

132 posted on 05/03/2011 11:10:29 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
"Putting boots on the ground to scoop up Gaddafi is a far different task than putting boots on the ground to nation build"

"Scoop up"? You do understand that Gaddafi is not a guy without ample military resources, unlike bin Laden, right? He has access to military assets - assets in Tripoli that are fiercely loyal to him. It's going to take MUCH more than two helos of SEALs to scoop him up.

We had close to 200K American service men & women in Iraq for over 9-months BEFORE we captured Hussein.

To think that we could swoop into Tripoli and in a matter of weeks, scoop up Gaddafi, to say nothing of days or hours is folly. It's apples and oranges compared to what just happened in Pakistan. An assault on Tripoli would require a division of men, countless billions and would cause untold destruction on Libyan infrastructure and result in many civilian casualties.

133 posted on 05/03/2011 11:10:43 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Putting boots on the ground to scoop up Gaddafi is a far different task than putting boots on the ground to nation build"

To think that we could swoop into Tripoli and in a matter of weeks, scoop up Gaddafi, to say nothing of days or hours is folly.

Unbelievable. Pick another flippin' word besides "scoop". Then plug it into what I said.

The point remains.

134 posted on 05/03/2011 11:14:56 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: unseen1
"oh so you are one of those that think we should treat these american murderers who are noncitizens under the court of law? "

More straw man arguments from the guy who specializes in fallacious arguments. I guess it shouldn't be surprising.

Did Osama bin Laden just get convicted in a court of law, or was he killed? I'm pretty sure he was killed.

Why is that different from the ridiculousness that's currently going on Libya? CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION.

If you want to engage a foreign sovereign using military force, then you better per US law and the Constitution, get yourself either a declaration of war or a Congressional authorization for the military use of force.

You have yet to demonstrate where that is for Gaddafi.

135 posted on 05/03/2011 11:15:14 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: indylindy; Liz

” Hey SJB, my singing isn’t really all that bad. LOL “

MINE is.....when I am in church, I sit next to the best singer there.......helps to drown out my croaking ;-)


136 posted on 05/03/2011 11:23:11 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Go Sarah! The naive neocons at The Weekly Standard & co have been intoxicated by The Arab Spring fever. They have lost their reason in believing that these movements are not organized, bought, and paid for by Islamist organizations like the Moslem Brotherhood. As we all saw immediately, their goal is an Islamist State and re-establishment of the Caliphate.
Already happening in Egypt, where MB is now claiming 50% of seats in new “democratically” elected Parliament.


137 posted on 05/03/2011 11:37:14 AM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Whoohoo! Run, Sarahcuda, run!


138 posted on 05/03/2011 11:39:08 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Palin in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

yeah it would take about a day to get the wimps in line to support the action.

but I guess you missed truman’s, Ike’s JFK, LBJ Nixon, Carter, Reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama’s actions without congressional approval and no declaration of war.


139 posted on 05/03/2011 11:47:51 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720
Good move by Palin. She was getting BAD advice.

She was the first public figure to call for intervention in Libya. I was prepared to scratch her off my list over that.

140 posted on 05/03/2011 11:53:38 AM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson