House Passes Complete Ban on Taxpayer Funding of Abortions

LifeNews.com ^ | May 4, 2011 | Steven Ertelt

[proudofthesouth]

“I wouldn’t want to be punished with the Obamas as grandparents.”

Narcissists make lousy parents as well. (Both of mine were.)

[Lauren BaRecall]

Everyone is already on record. Meanwhile, the House will not defund.

Boehner is still a b@st@rd.

[Lauren BaRecall]

You said it. This is all for show.

[zerosix]

Yes! Force the Senate and Obama to be on record NOW! That way, no one claiming to be "pro-life" then voting against this abomination of taxing me to pay for killing the unborn, will set them up for the next time they pretend to be a conservative, whether it's in 2012, '14, '16.

Many RINOs claim that either they are "personally against abortion" but "for a women's right to choose." Either case, they cannot claim either yet still be "fiscally conservative" while supporting continuing to raise my taxes to support that "choice!"

My message to any of them that does NOT support ending this abomination (using taxpayer's dollars to pay for abortions) doesn't even pass the smell test of fiscal conservatism.

If a RINO supports continuing to use taxpayers' taxes to pay for abortions - then they should be forced out of the party and become what they really are - liberal dimocRATS pro-abortion.

[Dr. White]

I agree with the premise, if not with everything on the list.

[prairiebreeze]

Of course! Otherwise, GOP would not have passed it. GOP had control of both houses of Congress and the Presidency, but they did not outlaw abortion or even pass a bill banning federal funding of abortion.

Good point. The republicans squandered so much opportunity.

[JimWayne]

The republicans squandered so much opportunity.

It was not a squandered opportunity. It was on purpose. Most of the GOP politicians are frauds.

[trisham]

bump!