Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California legislators insist their calendars should be secret
mercurynews.com ^ | 4 May 2011 | Karen de Sá kdesa

Posted on 05/04/2011 8:56:50 PM PDT by smokingfrog

Maintaining the entrenched secrecy of the California Legislature, leaders in the state Senate and Assembly have rejected a joint request by the Bay Area News Group, The Associated Press and the First Amendment Coalition to open the appointment calendars of lawmakers and their key staffers to public view.

The denial, received late last week, reveals that activities remain thickly shrouded inside the state Capitol, where a 2010 series in this newspaper documented just how beholden legislators are to lobbyists and the agendas pushed by campaign contributors.

Responding to multiple requests from the news organizations, the rules committees in both houses said release of the calendars would constitute "an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" under the terms of the Legislative Open Records Act. That applies even if the legislators themselves want to release the information.

Their refusal places the Legislature at odds with the governor, other state constitutional officers and local elected officials across California, who routinely release appointment calendars so their constituents can see whom they meet and why -- information that gives critical insight into how the public's business is conducted.

Peter Scheer, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, said the public access denials are so outrageous that his public-interest advocacy group is considering a suit over the Legislature's erroneous interpretation of the law.

"As they interpret it, it might as well be the Legislative Official Secrets Act," Scheer said. "The California Legislature sees itself as holding a specially privileged position in which they're not really accountable to anybody."

As part of a joint project, the Bay Area News Group, which includes this newspaper, the AP and First Amendment Coalition sent 171 separate requests for legislators' calendars.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: arrogantbastards; secrecy; transparency

1 posted on 05/04/2011 8:56:52 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

They want you to bend over without knowing what’s coming.


2 posted on 05/04/2011 9:03:20 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Help Send This Bunch Packing In 2012
Donate To FR By Clicking Here!!

3 posted on 05/04/2011 9:09:09 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

How about video taping under their desks too? That way, the taxpayers of CA can see their bribes more readily.


4 posted on 05/04/2011 10:07:40 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

This would be a perfect time for Californians to start work on a referendum that would cut the pay for lawmakers by 75% and make them a part-time legislature, only to meet 6 - 8 weeks out of the year.


5 posted on 05/05/2011 12:33:18 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

“Peter Scheer, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, said the public access denials are so outrageous that his public-interest advocacy group is considering a suit over the Legislature’s erroneous interpretation of the law.”

“ERRONEOUS interpretation of the law”???? I hardly think so - more like “cynical” and “unethical” to my mind.

CONSIDERING a lawsuit????? Why on earth are they NOT go forward with all due speed in that direction? Are they waiting for the CA legislature to take the next logical step on this preposterous path - denying the public access to any information about the bills they are debating? Would that finally tip the scale?


6 posted on 05/05/2011 4:49:15 AM PDT by Senator John Blutarski (The progress of government: republic, democracy, technocracy, bureaucracy, plutocracy, kleptocracy,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson