Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s ineligibility and the coming second American revolution
Canada Free Press ^ | May 6, 2011 | Lawrence Sellin

Posted on 05/06/2011 7:33:57 AM PDT by Ordinary_American

The truth is hiding in plain sight. At some point in 2008, the political elites decided to violate the Constitution. I know of no better explanation.

In September 2008, Lawrence B. Solum, the John E. Cribbet Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law, wrote:

“What was the original public meaning of the phrase that establishes the eligibility for the office of President of the United States? There is general agreement on the core of its meaning. Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a natural born citizen.”

The text of the Constitution, the intent of the Founders, judicial precedence and the historical background support that definition.

Every high school student, who paid attention in history class, knows that. Every elected President since the early days of the Republic has met that criterion. That is, every one except Barack Hussein Obama.

By his own admission, Obama is not a natural born citizen and is, therefore, not eligible to be President of the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; bc; certifigate; congress; constitution; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; nbc; obama; tinfoilalert
You get the most flak when you're right over the target.
1 posted on 05/06/2011 7:33:59 AM PDT by Ordinary_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

ping


2 posted on 05/06/2011 7:36:39 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

3 posted on 05/06/2011 7:43:00 AM PDT by brownsfan (I miss the America I grew up in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

Liberals are whores. They’ll gladly sacrifice even their own children to get a brother demon in the WH.


4 posted on 05/06/2011 7:43:31 AM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Yes, the problem is that they do not know that they are demons! They are brainwashed.


5 posted on 05/06/2011 7:45:42 AM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

“By his own admission, Obama is not a natural born citizen and is, therefore, not eligible to be President of the United States.”

Has he? I don’t know—just askin’

“Many Americans question why Obama has been using a Social Security Number issued in Connecticut, a state in which he never lived or even had a mailing address.

“It is also claimed that Obama’s selective service registration form contains that Connecticut number 042-68-4425, which the Social Security Verification Systems indicate that it was never assigned to him.”

This true?


6 posted on 05/06/2011 7:46:14 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Yep and unfortunately they have defenders at FR for some reason.


7 posted on 05/06/2011 7:46:16 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unkus; All

Orly Taitz on Peter Tilden show TODAY!!!

790 KABC LA, 7:30 AM Pacific Time.

Call 1-800 -222-KABC

http://www.kabc.com/


8 posted on 05/06/2011 7:46:34 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
After another fake-fraudulent birth certificate, we're back to square one: What is he hiding and why?

And no Obama, this is not going away. And no Obama, you are the fringe.

This is building and will get bigger. The best thing you can do for America is resign. We do not want your vision of our Sacred Republic.

From the article:

"If the political elites now fancy themselves successful tyrants, then the words of Thomas Jefferson provide an appropriate metaphor:"

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Is it time?

9 posted on 05/06/2011 7:48:09 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
Obama was mocking his eligibility issue at White House correspondence dinner, it is a very in your face presentation. (First 3 1/2 min.) Not what you would expect from your president. Very Odd. video
10 posted on 05/06/2011 7:49:44 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
Every elected President since the early days of the Republic has met that criterion. That is, every one except Barack Hussein Obama.

True, but Chester A Arthur a president who was not elected was NOT a Natural Born Citizen. His father was not a US Citizen until 14 years after the birth of Chester.

11 posted on 05/06/2011 7:52:34 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dn9mzJhvC-8E&v=n9mzJhvC-8E&gl=US


12 posted on 05/06/2011 7:53:55 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

Where is the uproar over this? Where is the call for removal??? Why did Trump back down, knowing this BC is fake & that he is not eligible??? Too many questions, not enough answers IMO!!


13 posted on 05/06/2011 7:57:42 AM PDT by blondee123 (Obama-Socialist in Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
The questions that need answering are, why? Was this complete oversight and ignorance of the Constitution or something far more nefarious? I think a majority of Americans can agree that Obama is not eligible to hold office. I say this because I personally don't believe the “polls” that are published on the subject but rather I believe what I encounter personally; that I have a harder time finding Obama defenders than I do doubters.
At some point, we need to move past Obama himself and get to the root of the problem; who put him there and why. Some say it was Soros, some say the Saudis and I say it was the Muslim Brotherhood. I'd like to hear what others believe on this subject!
14 posted on 05/06/2011 7:57:49 AM PDT by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

And what is the penalty for using a false social security number on your tax return?


15 posted on 05/06/2011 7:57:59 AM PDT by maxsand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

“...but Chester A Arthur a president who was not elected was NOT a Natural Born Citizen.”

Chester Arthur WAS ELECTED to the office of Vice President of the United States. The qualifications for Vice-President are the same as those for President.


16 posted on 05/06/2011 8:00:06 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
the political elites decided to violate the Constitution. I know of no better explanation. This is new?

This incidence of ignoring the clear meaning of the Constitution, though significant, pales in comparison to the disregard for the Constitution shown by both Congress and the Courts over the past century.

The intentional mis-reading of the Commerce Clause in Wickard v. Filburn; the reinterpretation of the Takings Clause in the Kelo decision; the invention of new (unconstitutional) Federal authority in cases from Marbury v. Madison to Roe v. Wade to Lawrence v. Texas; the sweeping abuses and attempted abuses under the General Welfare Clause; the presumed supremacy of the 14th Amendment over the ENTIRE remainder of the Constitution; the dismantling of the Federal Republic in the 17th Amdt; and on, and on, and on.

In short, this is not the first, the worst, or the last instance of "OUR" Federal Government disregarding its founding contract with the American people.

17 posted on 05/06/2011 8:07:59 AM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

I still haven’t gotten an answer to this question:

Why does the long form birth certificate of a man whose adoptive name was Barry Sotero and who, according to the Huffington Post (from information obtained from his sister) did not start using the name Barack Obama till age 18, have the latter name on it?


18 posted on 05/06/2011 8:11:45 AM PDT by Yet_Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxsand

Yeah...isn’t it funny how they get away with stuff and we can’t?

I’m thinking about stiffing the fed’s 10k on taxes next year so they’ll make me Treasury Secretary too. Or maybe a Congressman in NY.


19 posted on 05/06/2011 8:14:25 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

Not only is he not going away, he’ll be there at least through 2016. Nothing can stop this “man” when there are only some voices crying out in the wilderness. The gop loves this guy as much as the worshippers do.


20 posted on 05/06/2011 8:17:32 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Only a SECOND party will get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

My guess would be inside forces. the faces behind the scene


21 posted on 05/06/2011 8:17:44 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yet_Again

Because when he was born he was named Barak Obama after his father. When his mother remarried and they were living in Indonesia, his adoptive father had Obama’s name changed to Barry Sotero. This wouldn’t change the info on the birth certificate. The adoption papers and name change would just get added to the file. My question though would be, did he get his named changed ‘legally’ back to Barak Obama?


22 posted on 05/06/2011 8:24:41 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Chester A Arthur

Correct, only because he effectively hid his birth records. Your description of his ineligibility is correct. Precedent? Possibly, but only by deception.

23 posted on 05/06/2011 8:28:48 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a natural born citizen.”

Most of us realize that and it is correct. But the Communists Party (formally the Democratic Party) are power crazy and literally insane. At least one third of Americans are brain washed by many years of liberalism/communism. When will America wake up and put these insane nitwits to rest.

24 posted on 05/06/2011 8:31:39 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
The text of the Constitution, the intent of the Founders, judicial precedence and the historical background support that definition.

Every high school student, who paid attention in history class, knows that.

If birthers want to piece together new definitions of things in the Constitution, that's fine. But, come on, this isn't how it's taught in law school, let alone high school. If it were so obvious, where were these arguments in early 2008, when it would have actually made a difference?

25 posted on 05/06/2011 8:34:10 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

“the coming second American revolution”

“Is it time? “
____________________________________________________________

Not to be sacrcastic, but what, exactly, do you think the whites of their eyes will look like?

Most are cluelessly watching American Idol, or amusing themselves with other non-actions such as hanging out on FR.

We’re not organized, and will be squashed or infiltrated the moment we are organized.

It will not be a civil war with clearly drawn battle lines, or anything resembling the first revolution. There will be no pitched battles. It will be a series of uncoordinated guerrilla actions that grow out of the chaos only AFTER society has fallen apart. That is both good and bad: resistance movements and guerrilla warfare are generally more effective than standing armies, despite their superiority in numbers, logistics, organizational sophistication and weaponry. If we become Charlie or the Mujahidin we can eventually win, but it will be anything but glorious or swift or easy, or what most people expect.

My two cents.


26 posted on 05/06/2011 8:35:00 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
he was named Barak Obama after his father.

Are you sure of that? I am NOT sure the BHO, Sr. was his father. And why has no "hospital" admitted to being his birth place?? More question, no answers.

27 posted on 05/06/2011 8:36:23 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

Not new on FR. People who’ve been reading about it have know this and a lot more for a long time.


28 posted on 05/06/2011 8:40:56 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

And he tried to hide it in various ways. There were editorials in newspapers at the time wondering if he was lying about his father’s naturalization date and his possible ineligibility due to that.


29 posted on 05/06/2011 8:42:19 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I would agree that there are more questions than answers.

What would be worse— finding out that someone else was his father, but that person was a citizen, thus making Obama eligible, or having Obama Sr be his father, who we already know was NOT a citizen, making Obama ineligible?


30 posted on 05/06/2011 8:59:04 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
the book Unintended Consequences is worth reading, in this regard. Unfortunately, it seems to be out of print, and the prices on Amazon are outrageous (supply vs. demand and the free market at work). Borrow it if you can.
31 posted on 05/06/2011 9:00:56 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

By his own admission, Obama is not a natural born citizen and is, therefore, not eligible to be President of the United States.

See Obama Keyes US Senate debate, Sept 29, 2004:

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/SenateSt

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/15/obama-concedes-hes-not-a-nbc-in-obama-vs-keyes-2004-debate/

Obama has been using a Social Security Number issued in Connecticut, a state in which he never lived or even had a mailing address.

http://www.bing.com/search?q=obama+CT+SSN&form=HPNTDF&pc=HPNTDF

The elephant in the room will eventually demand to be noticed.


32 posted on 05/06/2011 9:08:15 AM PDT by white_lightening
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

“Yep and unfortunately they have defenders at FR for some reason....”

that’s part of what a three trillion dollar heist from the Treasury gets ya....


33 posted on 05/06/2011 9:09:07 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yet_Again
Why does the long form birth certificate of a man whose adoptive name was Barry Sotero and who, according to the Huffington Post (from information obtained from his sister) did not start using the name Barack Obama till age 18, have the latter name on it?

I've been wondering the same thing. It's so obvious I can't figure out why no one has brought it up. Please let me know if you get the answer.

34 posted on 05/06/2011 9:25:26 AM PDT by Do Be (The heart is smarter than the head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]



Free Republic Will Be In Serious Trouble
Without Your Donations


Sponsoring FReepers leapfrog0202 and another person will contribute $10
Each time a new monthly donor signs up!
Get more bang for your buck
Sign up today

Artificial Intelligence Lazamataz is fading fast.

35 posted on 05/06/2011 9:28:54 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
Anyone hear anything about this?

White House released the birth certificate:

Found two extremely strange inconsistencies that merit some attention.

First of all, the birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa ". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth.

How could have Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". But, this is not the only thing that I found that just does not jive.

The other item: The hospital that Obama was born in.

1978 merger http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx

On the birth certificate released by the White House,the listed place of birth is:

"Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia) The first direct elections for Africans to the Legislative Council took place in 1957. Despite British hopes of handing power to "moderate" African rivals, it was the Kenya African National Union (KANU) of Jomo Kenyatta that formed a government shortly before Kenya became independent on 12 December 1963, on the same day forming the first Constitution of Kenya.

36 posted on 05/06/2011 9:43:15 AM PDT by sniper63 (Endeavor to persevere, then go to war with 'em.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sniper63

I thought it said East Africa. I don’t recall it saying Kenya.


37 posted on 05/06/2011 10:31:15 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sniper63

By the way, it was known as Kenya Colony in 1920. So, I’m guessing that being the British Colony of Kenya, might be why the certificate said Kenya, East Africa.

I find it more odd that under race is says African instead of black or Negro.


38 posted on 05/06/2011 10:36:50 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sniper63
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged.

The hospital changed its name to Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children in 1978, not Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital. The name on the long-form is correct for 1961 and is the same on other long-forms from the time.

39 posted on 05/06/2011 10:39:19 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
The gop loves this guy as much as the worshippers do.

Then they are communist sympathizers and need to be voted out of office.

40 posted on 05/06/2011 10:56:41 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
If we become Charlie or the Mujahidin we can eventually win, but it will be anything but glorious or swift or easy, or what most people expect.

Yup, it will be a mess, but time and numbers will be on our side. I propose instead of Charlie we adopt the name Josey in honor of Josey Wales, "A good Joe", "GI Joe", and Joe the plumber. We're all Joseys now. .

"Now remember, when things look bad and it looks like you're not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plumb, mad-dog mean. 'Cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor win. That's just the way it is." Josey Wales

41 posted on 05/06/2011 11:09:05 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

Interesting time line on taking out UBL right after the release so it would go away.


42 posted on 05/06/2011 12:07:16 PM PDT by ItsMeOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Other approaches to dealing with a dead horse:

1. Buying a stronger whip.

2. Changing riders.

3. Threatening the horse with termination.

4. Appointing a committee to study the horse.

5. Visiting other sites to see how others ride dead horses.

6. Lowering the standards so that dead horses can be included.

7. Re-classifying the dead horse as “living, impaired”.

8. Hiring outside contractors to ride the dead horse.

9. Harnessing several dead horses together to increase the speed.

10. Attempting to mount multiple dead horses in hopes that one of them will spring to life.

11. Providing additional funding and/or training to increase the dead horse’s performance.

12. Doing a productivity study to see if lighter riders would improve the dead horse’s performance.

13. Declaring that as the dead horse does not have to be fed, it is less costly, carries lower overhead, and therefore contributes substantially more to the bottom line of the economy than do some other horses.

14. Re-writing the expected performance requirements for all horses.

15. Promoting the dead horse to a supervisory position.

43 posted on 05/06/2011 12:23:31 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blondee123
Where is the uproar over this? Where is the call for removal???

Why did Trump back down, knowing this BC is fake & that he is not eligible??? Too many questions, not enough answers IMO!!

*****

KAPIOLANI HOSPITAL HOLDS THE KEY?

To me, Kapiolani Hospital could put a final dagger in the birthers' heart by getting permission from Obama to allow a group of selected reporters from the major networks to examine and photograph Obama's mother's records for Aug. 4, 1961.

On the other hand, it is possible that the reason we are greeted by this continuous deafening silence from Kapiolani even though Obama released his long form birth certificate over a week ago on April 27,2011 is that Obama's mother was NOT a patient at the hospital on Aug. 4, 1961, the day Obama claims he was born in Kapiolani.

And, of course, if Obama's mother was NOT a patient at Kapiolani on Aug. 4, 1961, obviously, there would be no hospital records to look at.

As I see it, if Kapiolani and Obama remain stubborn between now and election day Nov. 2012---a period of about a year and a half---and don't allow reporters to examine Obama's mother's hospital records of Aug. 4, 1961, then I say that a lot of voters who voted for Obama in 2008 won't be voting for him in 2012.

44 posted on 05/06/2011 3:22:54 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American
You get the most flak when you're right over the target. ***********************************************************************

You are correct!!. ************************************************************************ Our "spinless" Politicians will be falling all over themselves to say they had no idea Obama was a "Fraud" when the truth if finally made available to the general public. ********************************************************************* Most of us here at Freerepublic already know this information.... We are hoping that others see the light before it is too late to save Our Country!! ***************************************************************** Another Excellent article from Lawrence Sellin!! He is not afraid to tell us the truth!

45 posted on 05/06/2011 3:39:50 PM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ordinary_American

Ping


46 posted on 05/06/2011 3:47:20 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Where is your faith?

You say nothing can stop this man? Your biblical reference citing voices in the wilderness reminds me of One voice that cried in the wilderness. That voice told us of the One who was coming to save the world. He came and over 2000 years later, He has millions of followers doing his will.

Just this week I read that high school teens want to know, “Who is Osama Bin Laden and what is all the fuss over him?” Most of us can only name about 1/3 of our 44 presidents. Most of the ones we remember are the ones in our own lifetime.

Yet, millions of new followers come to God in the name of his son, Jesus, every day. I believe God when he tells us “at the name of Jesus EVERY knee shall bow.”

God is ALWAYS in control of everything and everyone. The bible says He works in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform. It also says our thoughts are not His thoughts. The bible tells us we must earnestly contend for the faith while we wait upon Him.


47 posted on 05/06/2011 7:56:12 PM PDT by Jude in WV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jude in WV

The subject matter of your post is what gets me through the day. I know His will is going to be done. That means obama is in office because God wants it that way.


48 posted on 05/06/2011 9:08:28 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Only a SECOND party will get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Yet_Again
Why does the long form birth certificate of a man whose adoptive name was Barry Sotero and who, according to the Huffington Post (from information obtained from his sister) did not start using the name Barack Obama till age 18, have the latter name on it?

ping for later.

49 posted on 05/08/2011 1:34:21 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson