[lentulusgracchus]

Keep in mind the comments by a Times editor a few years ago, who commented complacently that 3/4's of New York Times front-page editors at that time were homo- or bisexual and didn't care who knew it.

That reflects, I think, selective hiring and discrimination against theists and people with morals generally by "Pinch" Sulzberger and New York Times editors generally since the late 80's, when "Pinchy" came aboard and slammed the paper's editorial tiller over hard aport, turning it into a ranting cheerleader for sodomy, sapphism, and pederasty.

[Dumb_Ox]

That reflects, I think, selective hiring and discrimination against theists and people with morals generally by "Pinch" Sulzberger and New York Times editors generally since the late 80's,

My pet theory is that NYC's passage of a sexual orientation anti-discrimination law in 1986 or so provided incentives for all businesses to promote homosexuals and otherwise adopt anti-discrimination policies to prove their compliance.

Media businesses in the nation's media capital therefore adopted an anti-discrimination editorial line, with only the most self-consciously conservative ones escaping the effects for a time.

But now even the NYC-based National Review has a significant # of staffers in favor of "gay marriage."

We have a state-controlled media, but this control is not obvious or even intentional.