Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are gay men more at risk for cancer? (New study says Yes)
Reuters ^ | May 9, 2011 | Genevra Pittman

Posted on 05/09/2011 4:58:52 AM PDT by Zakeet

More gay men reported being cancer survivors than straight men in a new study from California.

That suggests they may need targeted interventions to prevent cancer, the researchers said, but more studies are needed to answer lingering questions. For example, are gay men more likely to be diagnosed with cancer than straight men? Or, are they just more likely to survive if they do get cancer?

"A lack of hard data" on how sexual orientation affects the risk of cancer is "one of the biggest problems we have," said Liz Margolies, executive director of The National LGBT Cancer Network. Margolies, who was not involved in the research, told Reuters Health, "It's critical that we know that for funding and for program planning."

As a step toward addressing the lack of data, researchers looked at three years of responses to the California Health Interview survey, which included more than 120,000 adults living in the state.

[Snip]

The findings are published in the journal Cancer.

Out of 51,000 men, about 3,700 said they had been diagnosed with cancer as an adult. While just over 8 percent of gay men reported a history of cancer, that figure was only 5 percent in straight men. The disparity could not be attributed to differences in race, age, or income between gay and straight men.

[Snip]

[Scientists] agree that there is still an important message [besides the need for more government funded research] to take away from the findings: gay, lesbian and bisexual people need more attention from the healthcare community, specifically when it comes to their cancer risks.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; fdrq; gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; medical; riskybehavior
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Puckster

21 posted on 05/09/2011 8:28:06 AM PDT by Morgana (I speak no more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Nope, since homos are a politically preferred group, they’ll get all the resources they need to continue spreading their moral and physical diseases.

Yes I realize that is a likely outcome.

However all things being equal (they never are of course) Obama care implemented as intended would impact the homosexual community rather hard. Especially AIDS victims as there is no identified cure and it is costly to treat.

22 posted on 05/09/2011 9:34:51 AM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB; Zakeet
[Scientists] agree that there is still an important message [besides the need for more government funded research] to take away from the findings: gay, lesbian and bisexual people need more attention from the healthcare community, specifically when it comes to their cancer risks.

Another theoretical result of Obama care would be that so called “Orphan” diseases (rare diseases afflicting tiny portions of the population) would be even more neglected .

Homosexual men being about 3 percent of the population and any specific disease of that population would constitute an insignificant number of individuals therefore there could be no fiscal justification for investing dollars in research on those diseases.

23 posted on 05/09/2011 9:54:11 AM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
damn FDRQ...
24 posted on 05/09/2011 9:58:07 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac; Zakeet

No fiscal justification, of course.

However, the quintessence of liberal/leftist ideology is the wielding of power unequally in order to reward politically friendly groups and punish opponent groups.

There is NO WAY the equivalent of “NICE” (and I bet you could even look at how NICE and see disproportionate spending) would simply be examining each case fiscally and not politically.

I assert that this is THE core reason for implementing such a system here.


25 posted on 05/09/2011 11:24:13 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson