Skip to comments.Navy Authorizes Chaplains to Perform Same-Sex ‘Marriages’ in Naval Chapels
Posted on 05/09/2011 6:16:00 AM PDT by markomalley
(CNSNews.com) Anticipating the elimination of the military ban on homosexuality, the Office of the Chief of Navy Chaplains has decided that same-sex couples in the Navy will be able to get married in Navy chapels, and that Navy chaplains will be allowed to perform the ceremonies -- if homosexual marriage is legal in the state where the unions are to be performed.
The advisory came in the form of an April 13 memo issued to all chaplains, in which the Chief of Navy Chaplains, Admiral Michael Tidd, said the Chaplain Corps was revising its Tier I training manuals, which had previously indicated that same-sex marriages are not authorized on federal property.
Instead, Tidd called for chaplains to comply with service-wide efforts underway to be more accepting of homosexuality and same-sex marriage as the end of the military policy on homosexuality nears.
Citing "additional legal review" by Navy attorneys, the admiral said the Navy "has concluded that, generally speaking, base facility use is sexual orientation neutral.
If the base is located in a state where same-sex marriage is legal, then the base facilities may be used to celebrate the marriage, the admirals directive states.
The admirals memo also gives chaplains permission to "marry" homosexual couples but would not force them to perform ceremines.
Regarding chaplain participation, consistent with the tenets of his or her religious organization, a chaplain may officiate a same-sex, civil marriage: if it is conducted in accordance with the laws of the state which permits same-sex marriages or union; and if the chaplain is, according to applicable state and local laws, otherwise fully certified to officiate that states marriages.
Navy spokeswoman Alana Garas confirmed the change was ordered, but told CNSNews.com that the document does not reflect a change in policy, but a change in Tier I training for Navy chaplains that looks forward to when Dont Ask Dont Tell is removed something which will not happen, she said, until 60 days after the president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify to Congress that repeal will not harm military readiness.
But Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, is concerned that, in its haste to hustle-in homosexuality, the Navy may be violating federal law the Defense of Marriage Act.
Offering up federal facilities and federal employees for same-sex marriage violates DOMA, which is still the law of the land and is bound to the duties of our military, including chaplains, Steve Taylor, communications director for Akin, told CNSNews.com.
The administration and various states may be operating as if DOMA doesn't exist, but the Navy and Marine Corps and all the Armed Services are sworn to obey the law, which this new instruction violates, he added.
Tom McLusky, vice president of government relations at the Family Research Council, agreed that the Navy is totally ignoring DOMA, part of which defines marriage for federal government purposes as being between one man and one woman.
Youre talking about government facilities and government employees, so it would seem to be a direct violation of DOMA, McClusky told CNSNews.com. Im not seeing a lot of wiggle room there.
He said conservatives had warned months ago that the push to repeal the military ban on homosexuality would lead to efforts to introduce same-sex marriage -- but were dismissed at the time.
This is what we thought was going to happen, and unfortunately now its happening, McClusky said.
Unfortunately, the military is getting out in front on this issue and when you have a president who doesnt believe the Defense of Marriage Act is a law he needs to follow, its no surprise that the military would follow his lead, he added. The president may think hes above the law, but hes not. If he has a problem with the Defense of Marriage Act, thats something that he needs to address legislatively, not just by ignoring it.
Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), said the change in training was a good example of the type of uncertainty and confusion created in the rush to change the previous policy.
Trying to make sense of this issue, for example, is something that should have been thought out beforehand assuming the administration was even serious about doing this efficiently, fairly and respectfully, Hunters communications director Joe Kasper told CNSNews.com.
Hunter plans on offering an amendment to the annual defense bill to require that all of the chiefs of the armed services not just the chairman -- would have to submit certification that removing the military ban on homosexuality wouldnt harm unit cohesion and military order.
Four states plus the District of Columbia currently issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Maryland, New York and Rhode Island recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.
LOL...beat me by 0:45 seconds!
Just how does this work since same sex marriages are not legal in every state?
Since only 4 States currently recognize same sex and we’re supposed to have a DOMA, wouldn’t the military be subverting a majority of U.S. Law?
Final line of the ceremony;
“Who wants fudge?”
That would be a desecration of a chapel, and desecration is forbidden. Satanists, for example, are not permitted to desecrate cross, communion, or bibles in military chapels.
Catholics, orthodox, and other Christian chaplain in the lineage of historic Christianity should request separate chapels, and should request of their denominations statements affirming that homosexual marriage inside their buildings would be a desecration.
This turns my stomach and I wonder what the HELL is going on the military these days?
Will they force chaplains to do this.
If only the Navy could get back their Philipino cabin boys none of this would happen. ;-)
stuff like this makes me think we are living in the last days of this age.
The article says they can only perform the ceremony in states where gay marriage is legal.
The Navy will only perform burial services according to the Koran, but will NOT perform Same Sex "marriages" according to the Koran. I say we get the ACLU working on this right away...
I've repeated this often: Our chaplians will be demoted and even court martialed when they even dare to preach the fundamental thruths that homosexuality is a sin.
I guess wasn’t very clear. Let’s say John and Joe marry on base in a state where it is legal, but are then stationed in a state where it is not, whose law prevails?
This looks like an end run around state laws by the feds.
What about dependent ID cards will that vary from state to state?
can the skipper ‘marry’ two semens while underway ??? imagine the fireworks available and the honeymoon destinations offered...
“and that Navy chaplains will be allowed”
What if they refuse?