Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hasidic newspaper regrets editing Hillary Clinton out of photo
http://www.cbsnews.com/ ^ | May 9, 2011 | Brian Montopoli

Posted on 05/09/2011 10:22:07 PM PDT by NoRedTape

Brooklyn-based Hasidic newspaper Der Zeitung has apologized for publishing an iconic photograph of President Obama and his national security team with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and National Security team member Audrey Tomason photoshopped out.

The Jewish Week subsequently suggested the photograph had been altered because including women in photographs "could be considered sexually suggestive."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: apology; clinton; fakephotos; fauxtography; photoshop; seebsnews; soshillary; viacommies
PWN3D! Is this one of the most bizarre things ever? Wait.......is it 2011?
1 posted on 05/09/2011 10:22:13 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

Images of the undead do not appear in photos, so they say.


2 posted on 05/09/2011 10:28:42 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape
Hillary is still there. But how about the incredible shrinking president?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

3 posted on 05/09/2011 10:29:30 PM PDT by newheart (The trouble ain't too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right. -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape
The Jewish Week subsequently suggested the photograph had been altered because including women in photographs "could be considered sexually suggestive."

The Hasidim must be terribly repressed if this gets the juices flowing.

This is the stupidest thing a paper has ever done, and that includes the NY Times.

4 posted on 05/09/2011 10:30:54 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newheart

HiLarious!


5 posted on 05/09/2011 10:32:09 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

no, just Orthodox Jews expressing their orthodox views; very few outside the Orthodox community read the paper mentioned


6 posted on 05/09/2011 10:32:49 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

I'm just too hot for the Hasidim!

7 posted on 05/09/2011 10:34:11 PM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

And the Soviets, they once corrected the past, wiping recently-purged nonpersons out of archival photos again and again, hayna?


8 posted on 05/09/2011 10:35:11 PM PDT by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

If they had just put her in a burka for the photo they would have been applauded for their progressiveness and display of multiculturalism.


9 posted on 05/09/2011 10:39:22 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

Why are they apologizing? I guess they’ve forgotten her Paul Fray and Dick Morris comments?


10 posted on 05/09/2011 10:43:46 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Talk to me Hudson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

They “regret” it.........k, sure. lol. Unbelievable.


11 posted on 05/09/2011 10:45:45 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

ridiculous... there is nothing “sexually suggestive” in that pic... it was simply because they are female...


12 posted on 05/09/2011 10:54:08 PM PDT by latina4dubya ( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

The photo is “iconic” now?


13 posted on 05/09/2011 10:57:36 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Something appears to be missing in #3....can’t quite put my finger on it...

Hmmmmm


14 posted on 05/10/2011 12:06:24 AM PDT by Bradís Gramma (Where do YOU stand in your relationship with God???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape
The newspaper should run this picture above their apology.


15 posted on 05/10/2011 12:07:36 AM PDT by a fool in paradise ("If Eric Holder had his way, O-B-L would still be alive today." Thank you President Bush for Gitmo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

So this means that some people raised up concerns that a photo had been doctored. Is that like doctoring faxes of supposed national guard memos?

SeeBS wants to play such matters both ways.


16 posted on 05/10/2011 12:09:15 AM PDT by a fool in paradise ("If Eric Holder had his way, O-B-L would still be alive today." Thank you President Bush for Gitmo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

The dog had NOTHING to do with it.

[he only eats non-GMO organic]


17 posted on 05/10/2011 12:43:43 AM PDT by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Modifying the photo violated the Terms and Conditions of its use.


18 posted on 05/10/2011 12:51:00 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
CLASSIFIED:


19 posted on 05/10/2011 12:55:45 AM PDT by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

LOL!!!!!!

the dog believes NONE of it!!!! Oh, THAT one’s good, Sal!!


20 posted on 05/10/2011 2:01:31 AM PDT by Bradís Gramma (Where do YOU stand in your relationship with God???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape
"...including women in photographs "could be considered sexually suggestive."

It's apparent they need to get out more.


21 posted on 05/10/2011 2:07:40 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Every day we now throw away things people will kill for after TEOTWAWKI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Excuse me, but that should be a poodle not a Dobie. Please!


22 posted on 05/10/2011 3:11:00 AM PDT by Bullish (IT ALWAYS ENDS UP WITH HEADS ON PIKES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

meow?


23 posted on 05/10/2011 3:40:25 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape
The Jewish Week subsequently suggested the photograph had been altered because including women in photographs "could be considered sexually suggestive."

Even Bill Clinton does not consider anything about Hillary "sexually suggestive".

24 posted on 05/10/2011 5:00:45 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoRedTape

Regrets? Does ANYONE still have any balls left these days?! =.=


25 posted on 05/10/2011 7:17:35 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Sorry...I don’t own any Poodles so I gotta work with what I got...:)


26 posted on 05/10/2011 10:09:09 AM PDT by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Woof!


27 posted on 05/10/2011 10:09:45 AM PDT by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson