Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kate Swift, Writer Who Rooted Out Sexism in Language, Dies at 87
New York Times ^ | May 9, 2011 | WILLIAM GRIMES

Posted on 05/10/2011 8:03:30 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Kate Swift, a writer and editor who in two groundbreaking books — “Words and Women” and “The Handbook of Nonsexist Writing” — brought attention to the sexual discrimination embedded in ordinary English usage, died on Saturday in Middletown, Conn. She was 87.

The cause was stomach cancer, her grandniece Corin R. Swift said.

Ms. Swift turned her attention to the issue of sexist language when she and Casey Miller, her companion, formed a professional editing partnership in 1970 and were asked to copy-edit a sex education manual for junior high school students.

The stated goal of the manual was to encourage mutual respect and equality between boys and girls, but Ms. Swift and Ms. Miller, who died in 1997, concluded that the author’s intent was being undermined by the English language.

"We suddenly realized what was keeping his message — his good message — from getting across, and it hit us like a bombshell,” Ms. Swift said in a 1994 interview for the National Council of Teachers of English. “It was the pronouns! They were overwhelmingly masculine gendered.”

The partners turned in a manuscript with suggestions that sex-identifying singular pronouns be made plural, or that pronouns be avoided altogether, and that word order be changed so girls preceded boys as often as the reverse.

“The publisher accepted some suggestions and not others, as always happens,” Ms. Swift said. “But we had been revolutionized."

Now, they wrote in the preface to their first book, “Words and Women,” “everything we read, heard on the radio and television, or worked on professionally confirmed our new awareness that the way English is used to make the simplest points can either acknowledge women’s full humanity or relegate the female half of the species to secondary status.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: culturalmarxism; feminaziagenda; feminazism; feminism; feminist; kateswift; language; politicalcorrectness; sexism; words
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
How many female "firefighters" are there? How many people think "mankind" refers only to men?
1 posted on 05/10/2011 8:03:31 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The next time I watch Deadliest Catch and see a crab fisherwoman will be the first.


2 posted on 05/10/2011 8:05:32 AM PDT by VA_Gentleman ("Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very internet you invented." -Jon Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Just another example of the insanity that will consume our society word by word.


3 posted on 05/10/2011 8:06:28 AM PDT by davisfh (Islam is a mental illness with global social consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Right now, in the same state, they’re about to allow transgender men into womens public bathrooms. Kate would be so proud!


4 posted on 05/10/2011 8:06:57 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

English is actually one of the less “sexist” languages.

Most Indo-European (and many other) languages have “gender” as a much more integral part of the language. Most nouns and sometimes verbs are either masculine or feminine, or sometimes neuter.

How do feminists apply this idiotic concept to German or Spanish?


5 posted on 05/10/2011 8:07:51 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

May it rest in peace.


6 posted on 05/10/2011 8:08:41 AM PDT by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

She would have been horrified if she ever visited a plumbing supply house, with all those male and female fittings.


7 posted on 05/10/2011 8:11:19 AM PDT by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mkmensinger
May it rest in peace

Well played, well played.

8 posted on 05/10/2011 8:12:35 AM PDT by justice14 ("stand up defend or lay down and die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The word “firefighter” was not used years ago. The word was “firemen”. It was changed because of this very idea the article talks about.

And some liberals use the word “humankind” because they do indeed have a problem with “mankind”. You’re joking about it here, but some liberals actually think that way.


9 posted on 05/10/2011 8:12:52 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Hey Kate thank you for watering down our language and helping to dumb down our progeny.


10 posted on 05/10/2011 8:13:12 AM PDT by GunningForTheBuddha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

RIP.


11 posted on 05/10/2011 8:14:22 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This “feminist” movement is just another aspect of Cultural Marxism, commonly called “political correctness”.

The stupidity and awkwardness involved in changing the language was undertaken with an agenda, to undermine Western Cultural traditional values.


12 posted on 05/10/2011 8:15:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Good riddance to bad rubbish.


13 posted on 05/10/2011 8:15:46 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkmensinger

And remember the old “Star Trek”? Captain Kirk’s voiceover stated that the mission was “to boldly go where no man has gone before”. By the time of the next generation Star Trek in the 80s and 90s, Captain Picard’s voiceover stated “where no one has gone before”. It was changed because of the concept involved here.

We can talk about politically correct language, but it’s everywhere. We can think of many othe examples besides this one.

I know that in the business world and the medical fields, great pains are taken not to use the pronoun “she” when referring to nurses or secretary/office assistants. Reason being, the liberal idea that it’s sexist to assume that a person in such a job is a woman. The fact that 90%+ are women doesn’t matter, we aren’t supposed to use language that assumes this.


14 posted on 05/10/2011 8:16:49 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
87 years is a long time to carry a chip on your shoulder.

And a long time wasted on PC foolishness.

15 posted on 05/10/2011 8:18:38 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Jeez, I hope she did something else worthwhile, because massacring one of the loveliest languages the world has ever known was not worth celebrating.

Colonel, USAFR


16 posted on 05/10/2011 8:18:50 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“IT” died and I’m supposed to care.

Don’t think so.


17 posted on 05/10/2011 8:19:10 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Stomach cancer... hmmm. My father always said that hatred and a unforgiving spirit will manifest itself as cancer in one form or another. Maybe he was on to something.


18 posted on 05/10/2011 8:20:15 AM PDT by John.Galt2012 (I'll take Liberty and you can keep the "Change"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
the sexual discrimination embedded in ordinary English usage,

What nonsense. This is just an excuse for laziness, whining, and failure. As a woman who has been a lawyer for nearly 40 years, and has had her own lawfirm for 20 years, I have always used "he" and "his" as neutral pronouns, and "man" and "mankind" as generic nouns, and it has never held me back from anything. I detest the modern usage of coupling a single noun (eg, child) with a plural pronoun (their). It makes the speaker/writer appear illiterate.

19 posted on 05/10/2011 8:20:43 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I have never heard from her, but I am sure she was quite the authoress.


20 posted on 05/10/2011 8:21:07 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Did they drive her mortal remains away in a himse or a hearse?

Leni

21 posted on 05/10/2011 8:22:09 AM PDT by MinuteGal (BO'R Attacks Free Enterprise & Capitalism on Show....Lou Dobbs Holds Back Challenging Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkmensinger

Now THAT is funny.


22 posted on 05/10/2011 8:23:06 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
How many people think "mankind" refers only to men?

Back in the early Clinton years, I took a trip to the Smithsonian. Went to the Museum of Natural History as part of the tour. I'll never forget as I'm walking around looking at the exhibits they had one of those 'prohibited' signs

over the word "MANKIND" at some of the exhibits. Underneath the sign were the words "Help stamp out sexism in science".

It was truly a barf alert moment.

23 posted on 05/10/2011 8:26:34 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
grandniece

Grandyoungerrelative dammit! Grandyoungerrelative!!!!

24 posted on 05/10/2011 8:27:23 AM PDT by relictele (Pax Quaeritur Bello)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The amazing thing to me is how many conservatives have swallowed this garbage. I make it a point to always try to use the pronouns "he", "his", "him", etc when speaking generically. I have been surprised at how often I am "corrected" by "conservatives" and urged to say "one", or "one's", or even "he or she" or "his or her"!

I typically respond by telling them that I speak the English language; and by asking them what language it is that they think they're speaking ... cuz it ain't English.

25 posted on 05/10/2011 8:27:28 AM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The word “firefighter” was not used years ago.

I beg to differ.

"Firefighter" refers to one who battles a forest fire.

"Fireman" is a person who serves a municipality and who battles urban fires.

26 posted on 05/10/2011 8:32:11 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
How do feminists apply this idiotic concept to German or Spanish?

I can speak for German.

The German language has three genders: masculine, feminine, and neuter.

As Mark Twain famously pointed out in his essay "The Awful German Language" (part of "A Tramp Abroad"), there are numerous examples of nouns not at all corresponding to their grammatic genders (the word for "turnip," for example, is feminine, while the word for "girl" is neuter).

Many occupational designations end in "-er" (e.g., "der Lehrer" = "the teacher"), and can be simply femininized by adding "-in": "der Lehrer" then becomes "die Lehrerin."

So in most cases, it's possible to feminize words without too much clumsiness.

The problems start when writers insist upon feminizing the PLURAL so that both genders are accounted for: "die LehrerInnen" (= "teacher/Esses") - even though, according to standard rules, the Plural can account for both sexes / mixed groups.

And the situation gets really silly when nouns which are NEUTRAL are forceably feminized, as with the neutral word "Mitglied" ("i.e., "member" - as in "member of a club or organization"), the Plural of which is "Mitglieder." Because the Singular "Mitglied" is pluralized by adding "-er," and "-er" LOOKS like a masculine ending, they twist this into "MitgliederInnen."

As a side note, the (neutral) noun "das Fräulein" ("the young lady" or "Miss" as an honorific / form of address) has become taboo, since it is a diminutive of "Frau," and is hence regarded as condescending. Only my gray temples protect me from contemptuous looks when I address, e.g., waitresses ("servers?"; ""serveresses?") using this now antiquated form of address.

Regards,

27 posted on 05/10/2011 8:33:09 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

In fact, on 9/11, when I heard that “firefighter” were on the scene, I wondered how they got there from Colorado so fast.


28 posted on 05/10/2011 8:33:33 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Ms. Swift turned her attention to the issue of sexist language when she and Casey Miller, her companion ... but Ms. Swift and Ms. Miller ...

Rug munchers.

It figures.

Homosexualism destroys society.

29 posted on 05/10/2011 8:35:45 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

So she was ground zero for the feminazi movement? Good riddance.


30 posted on 05/10/2011 8:36:44 AM PDT by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

No tears here for the lesbo writer.


31 posted on 05/10/2011 8:37:14 AM PDT by Mr. Jazzy (The United States Marine Corps, your greatest friend or your worst enemy. YOU choose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PENANCE

One word Nazi has inspired many more word Nazis.


32 posted on 05/10/2011 8:37:59 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
I did not read the story very carefully but noticed that her grandniece made the announcement. Now I see why.
33 posted on 05/10/2011 8:39:45 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Her personual deservers to be tossed down a personhole.


34 posted on 05/10/2011 8:40:31 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
So we've finally found the person who was asleep in 3d grade when they covered common gender.

It's a shame she was too stupid to grasp the concept in later life.

35 posted on 05/10/2011 8:40:43 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Did they drive her mortal remains away in a himse or a hearse?

My little girl decided her little spray bottle was distinct from her brother's. His is a mister, hers is pink, and therefore, a misses.

36 posted on 05/10/2011 8:40:52 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Rose, there's a Messerschmitt in the kitchen. Clean it up, will ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

hopefully with her passing the PC will start to fade with her.


37 posted on 05/10/2011 8:41:20 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
"Did they drive her mortal remains away in a himse or a hearse?"

I'm not sure...maybe it says in her o-bitch-uary ;-).

38 posted on 05/10/2011 8:54:47 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
It didn't list too much in the o-bitch-uary.

Didn't even tell us who the ushims were.

Leni

39 posted on 05/10/2011 8:57:38 AM PDT by MinuteGal (BO'R Attacks Free Enterprise & Capitalism on Show....Lou Dobbs Holds Back Challenging Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

The apple hit Newton on the head because it was the macho thing to do.


40 posted on 05/10/2011 9:03:41 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The word “firefighter” was not used years ago. The word was “firemen”. It was changed because of this very idea the article talks about.

The assault on the "-man" occupation words predated the latest spasm of feminism. When those two, er, women got that particular bee in their lacy bonnets, they were hitching an ideological ride on an earlier disapproval of the association of work with one's sex.

In the early 1960s, I recall hearing firemen described as "fye-uh fightas" in suburban New York by callers to a local radio talk show. They were calling in to support some action against the City of New York by one of the firemen's unions.

The distinction in the air then was that, to firemen and their wives, it sounded more professional and educated to identify yourself by your technical expertise—fighting fires—rather than as a man doing a job because he was from the working-class caste, as the word "fireman" might imply.

At the same time, for similar reasons, in place of "policeman," a man would describe himself as a "pu-leese aw-fissa," and instead of a "garbage man," he was a "sanitation woika." They're still cops, firemen, and garbagemen to me, and I like 'em just fine. And as you've probably noticed, in private, firemen still call themselves "firemen."

Both feminism and working-class self-consciousness view the idea of work being a function of one's body as limiting to class aspirations: The higher you go on the social scale, the less connection there is between your body and your work. At the end of the day, "firefighters" still put out fires. Meanwhile, feminists . . . I haven't figured out exactly what they do, but it's a lot of talk, and very little work.

41 posted on 05/10/2011 9:23:34 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Thanks for nothing.

A lot of us don’t have issues with being women.


42 posted on 05/10/2011 9:33:41 AM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Well, there’s a wasted life.


43 posted on 05/10/2011 9:44:47 AM PDT by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

I wonder if there are genders in Hell?


44 posted on 05/10/2011 9:46:06 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The feminist manipulation of language was based on misrepresentations, but was necessary to create the aura of victimhood around women and to provide the feminazis a “basis” for harassing and intimidating people over minutiae so that they would be afraid to raise the bigger issues.

Feminism was manufactured by the left and males interested in women becoming “more available”.

Feminism destroys, and it has a legacy worse than Nazism.


45 posted on 05/10/2011 9:54:08 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkmensinger

“May it rest in peace.”

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA


46 posted on 05/10/2011 10:01:41 AM PDT by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Stomach cancer. That’s aggressive.


47 posted on 05/10/2011 10:36:31 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
That's One Small Step for One, One Giant Leap for hu-man-kind.
48 posted on 05/10/2011 12:03:00 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

I don’t mind saying “he or she” at all, but it is one of those points where the cultural marxists came in demanding this change and we all went along with it — why not, we thought? Maybe it was a good idea.

I’ve teased out what I think is one of the tropes of the leftists. Tell people they must do something they already do. Then tell them they must do something that they don’t already do, but would like to do. Then tell them they must do something they don’t care about either way.

Then start telling them they must do something they do not want to do. Frog in the pot.


49 posted on 05/10/2011 12:20:28 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Kate Swift, Spinster and Authoress Who Rooted Out Sexism in Language, Dies at 87

Fixed it old school style.

50 posted on 05/10/2011 12:23:39 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson