Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ravager

“Its not my opinion it is the Indian position.”

Yes, I know, it’s the official position in India. Like, I said, the “official” position.

“Besides most importantly the Indians were looking for technology transfers and some solid guaranties against sanctions.”.........Europeans are clear winners in this one.”

I see. “Technology transfers” are a “winner” for those who transfer their technology???; for a deal today, knowing it will mean the recipient will not need you tomorrow????

The transferred technology, and the technology transfers (a VERY political matter), WAS an the issue; NOT “superior” technology.

And yes, “sanctions” also (what you can do with OUR technology) are a political matter, NOT a technology matter.

Am I holding it against India? No. It’s natural. And IT IS POLITICAL.

It’s not about getting “the best fighter”. It’s about getting “technology transfers” and it’s about not having restrictions on the use of the technology being bought. Those ARE POLITICAL decisions. NOT “best fighter” reasons.


37 posted on 05/13/2011 3:41:27 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

Which of these fighters will be in service for the next 30 years? The European ones will continue to soldier on more than the US ones by virtue of the need for them to preserve their defense-tech base.

Which of these aircraft are the best aerodynamically and optimised to take on the threat of the new Flanker derivatives coming out from China-the European aircraft were designed for that role; the F-16 wasn’t. Why is it that people don’t talk about the Super Hornet’s deficiency in the air to air role-transonic acceleration, turn rates etc. These are the US Navy’s views, not mine.

The Super hornet has always been known as the great STRIKE aircraft-but which is easier to do-modify a fighter with ground attack capabilities? Or improve the aerial performance of a strike aircraft. To say the IAF went solely by “technology transfer/political concerns” avoids accepting the fact that the European aircraft had operational benefits.

Why do you think India purchased systems like the P-8I and C-17 from the US? Technology transfer? political mileage? May be, but most importantly because they offered decisive operational advantages over existing and potential rivals.


38 posted on 05/13/2011 6:37:02 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson