Skip to comments.Federal Employees Started One of Texas Fires But Obama Administration Still Won’t OK Disaster Relief
Posted on 05/14/2011 9:43:22 AM PDT by george76
Federal employees started one of the devastating fires in West Texas recently but, the Obama Administration still wont declare the region a disaster area despite the fact that 2.5 million acres have been burned.
The Obama Administration sent aid to Mexico to battle a 386 square mile fire but refused to consider the 2.5 million acre fire in Texas a disaster area.
Since the beginning of wildfire season, local and state firefighters have responded to more than 9,000 fires that have destroyed more than 400 homes and burned more than 2.5 million acres, an area the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined.
(Excerpt) Read more at gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com ...
Figures. Federal Employees Started One of Texas Fires But Obama Administration Still Wont OK Disaster Relief
Here is the article you mentioned DC - thanks - I’m stunned.
I didn’t start any of the fires.
Zer0 has a special angst for Texas.
I guess the implication is, “Think hard about the likelihood of a Gulf Coast hurricane before you vote Republican!!!”
I think the ATF idiots who did this need to be held personally liable for their stupidity in criminal proceedings.
I think the lesson is that states need to think long and hard and secession. It may be the only way to preserve liberty at this point.
This should show everyone that voted for him what happens when you cross him. A president that turns against his own people should be removed from office. A president that sends billions of dollars out of his country while his people are suffering, should be removed from office. A president that sends money to his country’s enemies, should be removed from office. A president that will not protect his country’s borders, should be removed from office.
Does the regime give any official reason why they won’t,, or are they just stonewalling it?
“A president that sends billions of dollars out of his country while his people are suffering, should be removed from office. A president that sends money to his countrys enemies, should be removed from office. A president that will not protect his countrys borders, should be removed from office.”
George W. Bush meets these criteria as well as does William Jefferson Clinton. Clinton was impeached but not for these reasons — perhaps he would have been convicted if he had been impeached for these reasons.
The Republicans control the House of Representatives and have the votes to impeach the sitting President. The absence of any action on their part to do so suggests they perceive the actions he is taking are within the scope of his job responsibilities.
Your correct sir. Red state, and George Bush lives there. Pay back
Does not impeachment require consent and/or agreement of the Senate? I don’t know.
If the Mexican Army invaded America,Obama would set up defensive lines in CA,AZ,NM,OK,AK and LA.
when Obama can guarantee the electoral votes from Texas, he will give them federal assistance. it comes with a price.
Rush explains: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2719604/posts
It’ is money that belongs to the tax payers, not zero.
Where is the gutless congress.
Texans don’t bow to tyrants.
The House brings articles of impeachment and the Senate tries the case with the SCOTUS sitting.
And, The One thinks Texas has a chance to turn blue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.