Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The T. Boone Pickens Earmark Bill (Ron Paul Co-Sponsors Taxpayer Boondoggle)
Globalwarming.or ^

Posted on 05/14/2011 5:45:17 PM PDT by mnehring

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: combat_boots

one of my co-workers has a hydrogen engine with his truck, he went from 12 MPG to 20 immediately, I am looking into making one myself!

The initial investment is under $250 and it runs on water!

So, I wonder how it will run on Hydrogen peroxide??


81 posted on 05/15/2011 11:05:49 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Ron Paul has lost his mind in his old age. He’s a follower and not a constitutional reform innovative leader anymore. He needs to be retired next election. I kind of had that feeling when he was running last election - that he was feeble and had been dominated by the libertarian anarachists.

He’s a Marxist socially and a economic chaos guy economically. About pork and Ron Paul before his mind failed him; he designed a strategy that if pork is happening, he will go for Texas to get their’s in committee but oppose it in the floor vote. That is okay with me. But now he is lost, lost, lost.


82 posted on 05/15/2011 2:21:55 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

The T Boone Picken’s plan is a wonderful idea. I already see buses in my neighborhood that say run on natural gas.

If you could get all trucks and buses off oil and onto natural gas the demand for oil imports would go down by several million barrels@ day.

That would translate into to lower gas prices for everyone. So whatever government “investments” needed to make it happen would be well worth the taxpayers dime because it would result in lower fuel prices for everyone.

Oh and there’s also the balance of payments thing.That would be improved —which would help the US Dollar as well as give some ballast to debt obligations.


83 posted on 05/15/2011 4:58:15 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
T. Boonedoggle Pickens-your-pocket strikes again!

Is it OK to beat up somebody who is over 80?

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Former “alarmist” scientist says Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) based in false science

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

84 posted on 05/15/2011 5:14:59 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I hate politically correct sorosmonkey superheroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EscondidoSurfer
Pay attention. NG has suddenly become plentiful in the US. No refineries needed. No pollution. No ethonol. No Arabs involved. We need to make it happen. Better spent on this than windmills and solar garbage.

I am, underlying your statement is an assumption that it's an uneconomic resource sans government subsidies, which is absurd.

85 posted on 05/15/2011 7:04:31 PM PDT by SJackson (Normal people don't sit cross-legged on the floor and bang on drums, WI State Sen Glenn Grothman (R))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

My recollection is that Ron justifies subsidies and earmarks cause he’s just returning the taxpayers money to them. Not to the taxpayers who paid the tax, of course, government serves as an intermediary to determine who tax money should be returned to. Government needs to deregulate domestic energy production, from gas to oil drilling to shale to coal, get out of the way, and let private industry and the consumer find the most efficient source of fuel. And if people want windmill cars, that’s ok to, we don’t import the wind.


86 posted on 05/15/2011 7:10:17 PM PDT by SJackson (Normal people don't sit cross-legged on the floor and bang on drums, WI State Sen Glenn Grothman (R))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

If it’s a tax CREDIT, it only means that it’s money fedgov doesn’t get its slimy hands on. I’m ok with that. It’s NOT money paid out of the treasury, it’s money someone’s made and GETS TO KEEP. I hope you see the difference.


87 posted on 05/16/2011 4:33:18 AM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Ron Paul can be bought all you Ron Paul bots.


88 posted on 05/16/2011 4:35:27 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

Except it isn’t just a tax credit. Section 202 provides subsidies to auto manufacturers and it also provides a blank check for grants for R&D.

BUT, as I pointed out before, even these tax credits are nothing more than government redistribution for social engineering. It is taking taxes from one group and giving it to another based on if they take part in ‘government approved behavior’, in other words, letting big brother tell you what car to drive.

I guess, if you want a LNG car, Ron Paul is from the government and he is here to help.


89 posted on 05/16/2011 6:00:26 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Looks like Ron Paul is only asking that people be allowed to keep more of their OWN money. How is that a subsidy?

Makes perfect sense to me that we should use an abundant source of fuel here for our cars if we have it. Theoritically you could fill up in your home.


90 posted on 05/16/2011 2:30:35 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

Repeated for the fifth time- Section 202 contains specific subsidies for auto manufacturers to produce LNG vehicles. It also provides a blank check for R&D to these companies.

BUT, regarding the tax credits- this is not ‘allowing people to keep their own money’, this is nothing more than government redistribution. It takes tax money from one group and gives it to another for the purpose of social engineering people’s driving habits.

This is not the government’s job. If it ‘made perfect sense’, T-Boone wouldn’t have his hand out begging for government money, money would be there to be made in the free market.


91 posted on 05/16/2011 3:05:50 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson