Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana Supreme Court rules Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful entry of homes by police
Hotair ^ | 05/16/2011 | Bruce McQuain

Posted on 05/16/2011 8:46:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Sherman Logan

RE: The court’s decision is not about whether the entry is legal or not, but about how the illegal entry can be legally resisted.


OK, I’ll bite, I am a non-vilent person... how do I LEGALLY resist an insistent and unlawful police entry?

My first instinct would be to say NO THANK YOU and SHUT THE DOOR on his face.

If he leaves, fine with me. But here’s the next question...

What if he bangs on the door and then forces himself in? What next?


21 posted on 05/16/2011 9:17:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“We hold that there is no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers.”

Go here to download the PDF of the decision.

http://www.nwitimes.com/news/state-and-regional/indiana/pdf_c82cdbb8-7ea0-5c55-bb00-2aa247134bbb.html


22 posted on 05/16/2011 9:21:21 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


We wish it grew there

23 posted on 05/16/2011 9:21:41 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What if he bangs on the door and then forces himself in? What next?

Apparently, in Indiana, you just lie face down and let the cop do whatever he wants. You can't act to protect your privacy, your family, your home, your person in any way. Perhaps someday years later, you can sue the police for wrongdoing, but good luck with that when the police all start lying to cover for each other and, not to mention, the damage to your privacy is already done.
24 posted on 05/16/2011 9:22:22 AM PDT by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

“The other part is that the court is giving up it’s own authority. Why would you tell the cops that they don’t have to come to you any more to be able to enter someone’s home?”

That’s right out of the Patriot Act. On the federal level the FBI writes its own warrants, ostensibly if it’s “terrorist” related, then goes back and gets permission retroactively.

It’s a short step to doing it for everything.

It’s for our own good, you know. (sarc)


25 posted on 05/16/2011 9:22:31 AM PDT by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Fred Nerks; Red Steel; ...

Unbelievable! Rush is talking about this NOW!

http://v4.player.abacast.com/player/player.php?pid=1187


26 posted on 05/16/2011 9:23:04 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

No, that’d just complicate the search with a bunch of unnecessary paperwork.

Besides, a warrant can always be obtained AFTER the search. I mean, after all, how are they supposed to know what things to list put on the warrant if they haven’t been able to look for them FIRST?

Frankly, I think it’s about time the whole ‘Catch 22’ situation that law enforcement has been in for the last 220+ years was cleared up.

Things will be SO much simpler now...

/s ——————————————> [for the unusually dense]


27 posted on 05/16/2011 9:25:59 AM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Since when does a state (or a judge within a state) have the right to circumvent the U. S. Constitution? If and when the SCOTUS get around to this one it will hopefully get tossed. If not, sounds like some police are going to get themselves shot at in the Hoosier State.


28 posted on 05/16/2011 9:26:06 AM PDT by vortigern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of the three justices voting for this insane decision, two - including the decision’s author - were appointed by Republican governors. There truly is no difference left between the GOP and the Dummies. “More power! More power! More power!” That’s the mantra of anyone in government.


29 posted on 05/16/2011 9:26:26 AM PDT by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The court’s decision is not about whether the entry is legal or not, but about how the illegal entry can be legally resisted.

If you have no "legal" way to resist on the front end, then "illegal" is the only alternative.

I'm glad my home state, Missouri, has "Castle Doctrine" laws on the books; illegal entry is illegal entry no matter who is involved.

30 posted on 05/16/2011 9:26:37 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

It looks like the press got the word out to the people of the state of Indiana, now it’s time for the people of that state deal with it.

Inaction of the greatest magnitude is acceptance!

You don’t get to sit on the sidleines, reading articles in the paper, and correct the judicial blunder. If they get away with this flagrant disdain of the Law of the land! Time to mobilize en mass! Get those judges off the bench!

It’s your state, not the judges.


31 posted on 05/16/2011 9:26:42 AM PDT by devistate one four (United states code 10.311 Militia Kimber CDP II .45 OORAH! TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

America is lost to the totalitarians.


32 posted on 05/16/2011 9:27:20 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What if he bangs on the door and then forces himself in? What next?

Inevitably, if Indiana citizens have no recourse/redress against the violation of their rights, the end result is citizens taking matters into their own hands after the fact.

Least that is where I see this going.

33 posted on 05/16/2011 9:27:39 AM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

As a former Law Enforcement Officer and Correctional Officer my family/ house has standard rules of operation.
NO ONE up to and including the FBI enters the house without a warrant. Anyone armed entering the house without a warrant is a home invasion and will be repealed with whatever force is nescessary.

No you can not come in a ask me questions. We can come back with a warrant. Fine, see you then.
If you are taken into police custody you never speak until you have a lawyer present. PERIOD...........


34 posted on 05/16/2011 9:28:16 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Long past time for the PEOPLE to take matters into their own hands.


35 posted on 05/16/2011 9:34:23 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; SECURE AMERICA

36 posted on 05/16/2011 9:35:17 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

RUSH BUMP


37 posted on 05/16/2011 9:41:27 AM PDT by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Cops or civilians, somebody is going to windup on the wrong side of dirt because of this stupid ruling if it's allowed to stand.
38 posted on 05/16/2011 9:42:27 AM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Bachmann, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Police in Indiana are celebrating their right to enter any home they wish in order to shoot the owner’s dog.


39 posted on 05/16/2011 9:47:42 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

These tyrants in black need to have their homes entered for no reason at all.
However, if someone wants to phone in a reason that leads to an entry, it wouldn’t spoil my day.


40 posted on 05/16/2011 9:53:33 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Bad posters drive out good; don't post and drive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson