Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Huckabee Out, Whither Iowa?
New York Times ^ | 05/16/2011 | MICHAEL D. SHEAR

Posted on 05/17/2011 3:48:17 AM PDT by iowamark

The decision by Mike Huckabee to forgo another presidential bid means that the former governor of Arkansas won’t be seeking back-to-back victories in the the Iowa caucuses...

But even as the wide-open nature of Iowa would seem to heighten the importance of the state in the nomination battle, some in the party have openly questioned whether the state’s Republican voters are so conservative that the outcome of its caucuses is irrelevant.

“Iowa Republicans have marginalized themselves to the point where competing in Iowa has become optional,” Fergus Cullen, a former chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party, wrote over the weekend.

“It’s hard to talk about real issues when three-quarters of the audience wears tinfoil hats,” he added.

That was just too much for Terry E. Branstad, the Republican governor of Iowa, who called a news conference on Monday morning to respond to Mr. Cullen and to urge Republican candidates to visit the state often.

“I don’t think he’s ever been here. At least, I’ve never seen him,” Mr. Branstad said of Mr. Cullen. “Certainly, his characterization of Iowa Republicans is way off.”

Branstad insisted that Iowa remains a “full-spectrum” state that provides the best testing ground for candidates looking to develop a message that can win around the country.

Asked about Senator John McCain of Arizona, who skipped the state in 2008 and went on to with the nomination, Mr. Branstad was dismissive.

“I wouldn’t look to his campaign in terms of how to run a successful campaign and be elected president,” Mr. Branstad told reporters on Monday. He noted that the Iowa straw poll, a summertime test of presidential preferences, is only 89 days away.

In fact, the campaign schedule suggests that the current crop of Republican candidates is beginning to pay attention to the state...

(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2012; huckster; johnmccain; mccain; primaries; tinfoilhats
Fergus Cullen: Iowa Losing clout because of people in tinfoil hats

The 2011 Ames Straw Poll is August 13, 2011 at Iowa State University in Ames.

1 posted on 05/17/2011 3:48:17 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iowamark

“some in the party have openly questioned whether the state’s Republican voters are so conservative that the outcome of its caucuses is irrelevant.”

Conservative, as long as you like ethanol.


2 posted on 05/17/2011 4:08:11 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
“I wouldn’t look to his campaign in terms of how to run a successful campaign and be elected president,”

The NY Times gets it right. whodathunkit?

3 posted on 05/17/2011 4:14:16 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory; and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
This Iowa/NH twosome thing is something the GOP adopted in the 70s after the Democrats did it.

These two have phenomenally outsized influence leaving most states' voters disenfranchised in the nomination process.

Anything that marginalizes Iowa and its ethanol subsidy addiction is a good thing.

4 posted on 05/17/2011 4:26:38 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Geithner raids pensions to cook U.S. books. Republicans to get blame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

No doubt that the Iowa Caucuses have given us the ethanol scam. The whole system with Iowa and NH having so much weight is what screws us. There’s not much fiscal conservatism in either state.

But you gotta love the NH governor calling Iowa a “tin hat” state with NH’s habit of allowing all kinds of dregs to vote in their primaries.


5 posted on 05/17/2011 4:34:14 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (American Thinker Columnist / Rush ghost contributor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
““Iowa Republicans have marginalized themselves to the point where competing in Iowa has become optional,” Fergus Cullen, a former chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party, wrote over the weekend.

“It’s hard to talk about real issues when three-quarters of the audience wears tinfoil hats,” he added. “

Let me guess, this guy is on the left side of the spectrum and doesn't appreciate the fact we have (some) conservative voters here in Iowa?

Anyway, what a immature and uninformed comment for someone from his state to say.

6 posted on 05/17/2011 4:42:48 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Those who endured Valley Forge didn't make their sacrifice to give us free health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
“some in the party have openly questioned whether the state’s Republican voters are so conservative that the outcome of its caucuses is irrelevant”.

Yeah and these same assholes are the ones that we will destroy and purge from the party. newt said this very same thing two weeks ago... the media was hiding it... but after Levin's surgical strike on newt LIVE yesterday... newtie is finished... he and his ilk will be purged. This is the nelson rockefeller repubic elite that hate all of us and they are motivated by their wives that are members of NOW. They LOVE them some abortion and they love them some big government and they hate GOD because they embrace ALL that GOD has warned us to shun. Rush has spoken of being approached to help crush our social issues and this is what Rush has explained in detail as to who and what these people are.

LLS

7 posted on 05/17/2011 4:46:43 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
"NH’s habit of allowing all kinds of dregs to vote in their primaries."

Are you referring to NH's policy of allowing MAssholes to immigrate and then vote for MA policies?

8 posted on 05/17/2011 4:53:51 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Yes, MAssholes and indies and all kinds of folks who have nothing in common with the Republican base voter — but who have outsized impact on the GOP nominee.


9 posted on 05/17/2011 4:55:40 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (American Thinker Columnist / Rush ghost contributor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

With the earlier primary in Florida, as Florida goes, so goes the nation.


10 posted on 05/17/2011 5:00:59 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

That was Iowa’s guv speaking.


11 posted on 05/17/2011 5:02:29 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Both Iowa and New Hampshire are far less relevant than either state wishes to believe. Florida and South Carolina will have much more impact on the eventual nominee.


12 posted on 05/17/2011 5:04:42 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Winning The Future" = WTF = What The F*** / "Kinetic Military Action" = KMA = Kiss My A**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

NH also lets anyone vote in any primary—with their de facto open primary tradition. (Voters just maintain independent status or switch to whichever party’s primary they want to vote in in advance of the election.)


13 posted on 05/17/2011 5:05:57 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Newby, please.


14 posted on 05/17/2011 5:52:47 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Ethanol doesn't compare with abortion. Of course, a huge number of really pro-life candidates could split the vote enough to allow a "moderate" on the issue to slip in but for the most part, I wouldn't advise anyone to come to Iowa who is not solidly pro-life.

I don't even remember Huck's position on ethanol but by pro-lifers, he was considered to be the strongest and that is why he won Iowa.

Too bad some of those voting Huck didn't look at the whole picture and realize there were actually others who were more conservative on many issues than Huck.

15 posted on 05/17/2011 5:59:39 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Stolen from a fellow FReeper:

Here I am,
Rock you like a Herman Cain!


16 posted on 05/17/2011 6:01:25 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I love it!


17 posted on 05/17/2011 7:05:21 AM PDT by RockinRight (Yes We Cain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson