You didnt simply state anything but argued it. You continually tried to equate homosexuality to heterosexuality as if they should be treated equally and used the argument always used by the left-wing claiming that we all should accept any perverse behavior as long as it is between two consenting adults.
Besides you why do you use the Lawrence case as a basis for your argument as if you agree with it? Being that it was a judicial activist decision I would think that you would oppose it if you do not support perversion rights.
Like it or not, Lawrence is the Law of the Land.
And states cannot pass laws that are in direct violation of the US Constitution or SCOTUS Rulings.