Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Documents Raise Questions about Supreme Court Justice Kaganís Role in Obamacare Defense as...
Judicial Watch ^ | May 18, 2011

Posted on 05/18/2011 10:26:02 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-65 last
To: jazusamo

Those hoping the SC will stop this unconstitutional piece of garbage are *fools*. The fix is in, was from the get go. And we have people like Mitt Romney considered “front runners”? How do you like them apples?

The fascists got a great deal, temporarily giving up control of the House in exchange for railroading this monster through.

Obama appoints 2 more Justices and we had better be seriously prepared for crimes on the part of the federal government that have been thought impossible in this country. The right “crisis” and there will be an executive order suspending civil liberties.....indefinitely.


51 posted on 05/18/2011 9:25:54 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
At the very least, if ObamaCare reaches the Supreme Court, Kagan should be forced to recuse herself.

By who? The rallying cry of liberal law breakers is "no controlling legal authority". Worked for Gore and the Buddist Temple, is working for Obama and his fictional eligibility. And it will work if this case ever gets to the SC.

If the Republicans had any integrity, they would force a Constitutional crisis over her when if/when this gets to the court. They won't.

52 posted on 05/18/2011 9:29:54 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yes, she should but I would be surprised if she did unless pressured to do so.....

The Left never seems to do the ethical thing. The lefties are always about furthering their policies and judicial activism.


53 posted on 05/18/2011 9:31:01 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (The Constitution is an instrument to protect 'We the People' from the government..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Republicans pencil-whipped her approval and let her slide in with no resistance. Much was known of her lying. They chose not to bring it up. Remember in November 2012.


54 posted on 05/19/2011 4:28:57 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

I can just imagine the stuff were going to find when we throw this bum out in 2012


55 posted on 05/19/2011 6:10:14 AM PDT by jneesy (Under Reagan we had Johnny Cash and Bob Hope under Obama we have niether cash nor hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She MUST recuse herself from any Obamacare hearing!!!!!


56 posted on 05/19/2011 7:32:05 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay

We have so much to do:
vote out this president
get a majority in the House and Senate
Impeach Justice Kagan
repeal obamacare
reduce size of government
get the borders secure
Then, and only then, get a new immigration policy and process


57 posted on 05/19/2011 8:34:13 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama is a fraud. The founders gave us the tool of impeachment for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

Amen, my FRiend amen


58 posted on 05/19/2011 9:23:45 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
"Kagan has said she was not involved in Department of Justice (DOJ) preparations for legal challenges to Obamacare.

Moreover, the Supreme Court justice did not recuse herself from the High Court decision in April 2011 not to "fast-track" for Supreme Court review Virginia's lawsuit challenging Obamacare."

59 posted on 05/19/2011 9:46:49 AM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yet anther problem with the injustice system is the injustices discretion in whether or not their they themselves have a conflict of interest. LoL

It really is amazing how easily corruptible our Federal injustice system is and discussing how arrogant the injustices are about it.


60 posted on 05/19/2011 1:52:18 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

Yep, Holder and his appointed thugs do Obama’s bidding and you can bet Obama doesn’t want Kagan recusing herself.


61 posted on 05/19/2011 2:17:43 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Yep, Holder and his appointed thugs do Obama’s bidding and you can bet Obama doesn’t want Kagan recusing herself.”

My problem is the whole hypocritical, fatally corrupt, and self serving Federal inJustice system.

It might have been workable in the days when the Judges alone felt compelled to enforce their own edicts. But as more and more exclusives feel they must carry out the wild ravings of theses would be dictators rather then uphold their oath to follow the Constitution.

Theses “judges” have become not only crazy political hacks but dangerous supreme dictators, and lawyers have become their legislators.

It was not always this way, but I must admit the thought has crossed my mind that people like Hamilton might have hoped in their wild fantastic about power it would become this way.

In any-case the left has roughly 100 years ago realizes this “potential” and worked tirelessly to develop it as a means to power.


62 posted on 05/19/2011 8:03:16 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

bump


63 posted on 09/28/2011 2:06:47 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (PDS=someone that doesnt dream dates up of a Palin announcement;nor act as Palins campaign manager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

the house needs to draft impeachment procedings now and get her removed. Even if the senate does not vote to remove her. The demoncrats would be on record thumbing their noses at the law.


64 posted on 09/28/2011 6:45:16 PM PDT by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

Good point and of course the Senate would not vote to remove her. A vote would also most likely show that two or three RINOs would vote with the Rats and put them on record as well.


65 posted on 09/28/2011 6:54:55 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson