Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2011 5:33:24 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MplsSteve
There are strong political forces trying to redefine marriage. Three same-sex couples are before the Minnesota Court of Appeals demanding that marriage be redefined as a matter of constitutional law. Last year a bill was introduced in the state Legislature that would have abolished marriage, substituting genderless "civil unions" in its place.

The proposed marriage amendment recognizes the gravity of these attacks and places the definition of marriage where it should be - before the people. Voters in 30 other states have had their say on the constitutional definition of marriage. It is time that Minnesotans have their turn.

2 posted on 05/18/2011 5:34:42 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

Can we vote on the definition of other words too??


3 posted on 05/18/2011 5:36:27 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema
If opponents don't like "discrimination" written into their constitutions, then they should propose their own "Equal Marriage Amendment" and have a positive . . .

No, wait, that would require supermajorities to pass, rather than the bang of a liberal's gavel.

4 posted on 05/18/2011 5:37:02 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema; little jeremiah; wagglebee; massmike
[Art.] Some object that not all marriages produce children, and some couples intend not to have children at all. They say marriage is not about the creation and nurturing of children, but the love of the couple......There are strong political forces trying to redefine marriage. Three same-sex couples are before the Minnesota Court of Appeals demanding that marriage be redefined as a matter of constitutional law. Last year a bill was introduced in the state Legislature that would have abolished marriage, substituting genderless "civil unions" in its place.

This is an excellent essay. It would be more forthright to say that the homosexual and deviant political movement is working to destroy marriage as a hallmark social institution for the betterment of society, that has the (to them) inconvenient, even intolerable side effect of limelighting their own deviancy and degeneracy.

5 posted on 05/18/2011 7:11:49 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

Teresa Collett was the GOP candidates for US House of Representative from MN District for Ramsey County in the 2010 election cycle (from St. Paul). Unfortunately she lost to Betty McCallum, a ditzy typical Democrat.


6 posted on 05/18/2011 7:22:26 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Homosexuals want same sex "marriage" for two reasons. One is to dismantle the natural family and destroy morality, thus entirely changing society into their liking. The secondary reason is finanical benefits; but that is definitely not as important to them. For one thing, they have said so in their own words, and second, not that many homosexuals even get "married" when it is made legal. Another point is that homosexual activists do not want the citizens to be able to vote on this (most of them anyway) since even in CA the people keep voting it down, time after time. The homo-agenda pushers need Judges Gone Wild and slimy legislators to force it on us.

7 posted on 05/18/2011 8:16:50 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema
Teresa Collett is a professor of law at the University of St. Thomas. Stephen J. Heaney is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of St. Thomas.

I thought that the University of St. Thomas was pretty firmly in the grasp of hard left politics. Will these two writers have jobs next week?

9 posted on 05/18/2011 9:53:17 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorthWoody; Manic_Episode; mikethevike; coder2; AmericanChef; Reaganesque; ER Doc; lesser_satan; ...

WELCOME TO FREE REPUBLIC’S MINNESOTA PING LIST!

148 MEMBERS AND GROWING...!

FREEPMAIL ME IF YOU WANT ON OR OFF THIS LIST!


11 posted on 05/20/2011 8:10:10 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

If you want fresh tears, they are voting on it today on the House Floor. The DFL is crying and whining. So glad this is televised for my entertainment


12 posted on 05/21/2011 4:44:21 PM PDT by downwdims (It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson