Skip to comments.
White House skips legal deadline on Libya (Obama "skips" the law)
ap ^
| 5/20/2011
| ap
Posted on 05/21/2011 5:06:53 AM PDT by tobyhill
The White House is skipping a legal deadline to seek congressional authorization of the military action in Libya but few on the Hill are objecting.
Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973 a president can only send troops into combat for 60 days without congressional mandate.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abovethelaw; congress; imperialism; libya; noflyzone; obama; obamaswar; warpowers
1
posted on
05/21/2011 5:07:01 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
The law doesn’t apply to him. . . . . he is above the law.
2
posted on
05/21/2011 5:11:15 AM PDT
by
DeaconRed
(Everything is broken-While zer0 fiddles.)
To: tobyhill
I thought there were no troops on the ground. That changed?
3
posted on
05/21/2011 5:11:23 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Who is John Galt?)
To: tobyhill
To: tobyhill
I think the word missing from the AP thesaurus is “violates”.
5
posted on
05/21/2011 5:12:58 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: EQAndyBuzz
The AP is trying to give Obama selective distinction but the WPA specifically states “US Armed Forces”. That would include assets controlled by US Armed Forces like drones or missiles over Libyan air space.
6
posted on
05/21/2011 5:17:36 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: SpaceBar
I am Pissed at Boehner . It is his Job to call out the President.
On this I don't blame Obama its congress's job to demand their War Powers.
Not say we not in session, damn we have soldiers in danger and Congress doesn't want to work?
Revolt inside the GOP , Boehner must go.
7
posted on
05/21/2011 5:17:52 AM PDT
by
scooby321
To: EQAndyBuzz
I do not believe” military action” means that troops need to be in the field of battle, just that the military is involved in any action.
To: scooby321
While I also think Bonehead Boehner should call him out, it is Obama that must comply with the law.
9
posted on
05/21/2011 5:19:38 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
To a Leftist, the “law” is whatever you can get away with.
10
posted on
05/21/2011 5:21:45 AM PDT
by
fwdude
(Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
To: tobyhill
Would somebody tell me what the “downside” is for not following the Constitution? I’m beginning to wonder if the Constitution “matters” or if it is just another “dead religion”. I know this sounds harsh, but we see this president skirting the Constitution all the time and nothing happens ... just some right wing criticisms ... but no jail time or firing squad. I guess the Constitution has lost it’s teeth?
11
posted on
05/21/2011 5:25:05 AM PDT
by
ThePatriotsFlag
(You are just jealous because the voices aren't talking to YOU!)
To: tobyhill
Where’s our team to object?
To: tobyhill
No surprise in that.There have been so many occasions where this regrime has violated the law, what is one more?
Where are the Republicans? They now control the House?
13
posted on
05/21/2011 5:29:28 AM PDT
by
sport
To: Voter#537
So what good is the oath of office for elected officials? It it obviously just for show, as none of them follow it, and there is obviously no process in place to punish those who violate their oath.
The last thing we were told at the induction center when I joined the Air Force was, "You are about to take the oath, if you want to leave, leave now, because once you take the oath you are officially in the military and if you leave then, you will be AWOL".
So the law of the oath only pertains to the peons, and not to jackwagons like obama? The law of the jungle is replacing the law of the land.
14
posted on
05/21/2011 5:35:51 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
To: tobyhill
I’m “special” and besides, you ugly American’s “have it coming to us” so you all can just suck it and shut up /sarcasm.
So says this Street Punk we have as President.
15
posted on
05/21/2011 5:36:17 AM PDT
by
R0CK3T
To: sport
Pardon my Frencih but the House republicans are led by a limp wristed know nothing from Ohio who has no stomach for a war upon the forces of evil.
To: tobyhill
Parody of the Bobby Fuller Four....
I flaunt the law,
and, "The One" won
17
posted on
05/21/2011 5:37:15 AM PDT
by
Aevery_Freeman
(What do we do after reelection? The $1,000,000,000.00 fix is in.)
To: 9YearLurker
Sleeping in after a long week of bamboozling Americans.
18
posted on
05/21/2011 5:38:25 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: R0CK3T
I should not reply when I’m angry...
“have it coming to us” - should be - “have it coming to you”
19
posted on
05/21/2011 5:38:34 AM PDT
by
R0CK3T
To: Yet_Again
Sad isn’t it? Our side needs pit bulls and all we have are toy poodles.
20
posted on
05/21/2011 5:45:46 AM PDT
by
sport
To: sport
| Countdown until Obama leaves Office: 609 days as of May 21, 2011.  It's the gas and groceries stupid! And Bernanke says the labor market in 'a very deep black hole'
------------------------------ Zer0's been neither crowned nor ordained
but his reign has been far from restrained
When folks wake up tomorrow
they'll find to their sorrow
who's in line to receive the royal pain
Hope and Change.... Tragic. |
21
posted on
05/21/2011 5:49:34 AM PDT
by
BobP
(The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
To: tobyhill
What do we need Congress for? We have a king now. The first monarch of Northern America. The people should not rise up against the king, we should be ushering Congress out of office reminding them that kings don't need the approval of the serfs, the king is the law, the king does not go begging for approval.
We should rid ourselves and the king of the parasites in Congress who will not rise in defense of the people that elected them.
There is only the king, we need no other.
Impeach Congress.
22
posted on
05/21/2011 5:57:57 AM PDT
by
The Louiswu
(Long Live the King.)
To: ThePatriotsFlag
I’ve beensaying this for a while, so I’ll say it again. Just about everyone needs to be unelected in D.C. Short of that, things are going to go from bad (real bad) to worse.
23
posted on
05/21/2011 6:57:14 AM PDT
by
jpsb
To: tobyhill
“This is not the Congress you are looking for.” (I Be da Won and Can Only Be)
24
posted on
05/21/2011 7:11:15 AM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
To: tobyhill
Mr. Soetoro is taking liberties with the document he swore to protect and defend yet refers to the Constitution as a
"charter of negative liberties". Barry has set a new high for an elected official who holds the Constitution in such low esteem. Maybe Senator Robert "Sheets" Byrd should have bequeathed his "pocket version" the Constitution to Barry.
25
posted on
05/21/2011 7:11:36 AM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: SERKIT
nobama was heard to say...”constitution...schmonstitution...”
26
posted on
05/21/2011 7:20:11 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
To: ThePatriotsFlag
--
Would somebody tell me what the "downside" is for not following the Constitution? --
It's selectively not applied. The general game being played is "avoid accountability." Congress is winning, so far.
Congress let Bush create a military court, also against the Constitution. The president is not a natural born citizen, also against the constitution, lots of federal and state laws that infringe fairly pedestrian keeping and bearing of arms; the war on (some) drugs is fought from a federal level; the Commerce Clause is construed to give the federal government the power to compel individuals to enter into commerce; the list goes on and on and on.
We are living in "the downside." I don't believe there is any downside to the politicians or their armies of minions (government bureaucrats of all stripe).
27
posted on
05/21/2011 7:20:55 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: The Louiswu
Is the War Powers Act an actual law, or just a resolution? If it is law, the House law should begin impeachment proceedings immediately for violating the law.
28
posted on
05/21/2011 7:46:59 AM PDT
by
ez
("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, Paradise Lost)
To: tobyhill
Obama has more in common with Jefferson Davis than he does any American president.
29
posted on
05/21/2011 7:49:17 AM PDT
by
Crawdad
To: tobyhill
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548)[1] is a non-binding Joint Resolution intended to restrict the power of the President to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of “a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”[citation needed]
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.
Despite the apparent non-ambiguity of its language, the War Powers Resolution has been regularly ignored by presidents of both parties,[2][3]some even declaring their belief that the act is unconstitutional.[4][5]
30
posted on
05/21/2011 7:49:22 AM PDT
by
ez
("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, Paradise Lost)
To: ez
“The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.”
Thus meaning it is law.
31
posted on
05/21/2011 8:12:30 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
He skipped it while he was skipping rope with little girls on the BathHouse lawn.
No news there, really.
32
posted on
05/21/2011 8:15:24 AM PDT
by
melancholy
(Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
To: tobyhill
Those stupid Libyans. Don’t they understand that Obama and the Democrats are only killing them because they want them to have better lives?
33
posted on
05/21/2011 8:17:14 AM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: tobyhill
34
posted on
05/21/2011 9:19:14 AM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: tobyhill
Congress is gonna have to send their “enforcement agents” after his scrawny butt.
35
posted on
05/21/2011 9:21:31 AM PDT
by
RobinOfKingston
(An election is not a (national) suicide pact.)
To: tobyhill
36
posted on
05/21/2011 9:29:05 AM PDT
by
ez
("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, Paradise Lost)
To: All; tobyhill
Congress will support Obama and ignore non-compliance with the War Powers act. They are spineless cowards. These things only apply to Republican presidents.
The press and Obama's Democrat co-conspirators will throw up a fog of "partisanship" and "racism" to give him cover.
Every single one of us should contact our congresspeople and senators, whatever the party, to be heard on this issue.
To: tobyhill
The House of Representatives can just defund it anytime. Boehner needs to warn Barry that he’s going to do it.
38
posted on
05/21/2011 9:55:46 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson