Skip to comments.
Supreme Court judge [Kagan] suspected of deception during confirmation hearings
Law Enforcement Examiner ^
| May 22, 2011
| Jim Kouri
Posted on 05/22/2011 9:50:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

A Washington, DC-based public-interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption reported on Friday that its officials have obtained documents suggesting US Supreme Court Associate Justice Elena Kagan helped coordinate the Obama administration’s legal defense of the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) while she served as Solicitor General.
During her confirmation, Kagan claimed she was not involved in the Department of Justice (DOJ) preparations for legal challenges to Obamacare. Moreover, the Supreme Court justice did not recuse herself from the High Court decision in April 2011 when she and other Justices refused to “fast-track” the Supreme Court review of Virginia’s lawsuit challenging Obamacare.
The following are highlights from the documents obtained by Judicial Watch as a result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on February 24, 2011. (Judicial Watch’s lawsuit has been consolidated with a similar FOIA lawsuit that had been first filed against the DOJ by Brent Bozell and the Media Research Center. The lawsuits are now both before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia...)
According to a memo from former Deputy Solicitor General (and current Acting Solicitor General) to Brian Hauck, Senior Counsel to Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, Kagan was involved in the strategy to defend Obamacare from the very beginning...
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicagoresumefraud; harvard; harvardresumefraud; kagan; kaganresumefraud; noveritas; obamaresumefraud; resumefraud; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Too late.
Republican opposition research is non-existent.
2
posted on
05/22/2011 9:51:47 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson)
To: Jeff Chandler
Is not lying to congress a “high crime”. Seems to me she could be impeached for lying.
3
posted on
05/22/2011 9:54:05 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
To: EternalVigilance
To: Mouton
Seems to me she could be impeached for lying.By whom?
5
posted on
05/22/2011 9:55:23 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson)
To: Mouton
they ALL lie! ERGO they do not prosecute the Dems, because the Repubics are JUST as guilty of deception and lying! The entire lot of them is a den of thieves (end of rant)
6
posted on
05/22/2011 9:56:20 AM PDT
by
MagUSNRET
To: EternalVigilance
Her appointment is illegitimate anyway.
One of these days that will come out as well.
7
posted on
05/22/2011 9:57:00 AM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: EternalVigilance
Kagan is a member of the Piarte Roberts’ Court. She does not answer to the people before, during, or after confirmation.
8
posted on
05/22/2011 9:57:25 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: MagUSNRET
To: MHGinTN
10
posted on
05/22/2011 10:01:13 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: EternalVigilance
Good Luck getting rid of her.
We have to get rid of zer0 first. . . .
11
posted on
05/22/2011 10:02:12 AM PDT
by
DeaconRed
(Everything is broken-While zer0 fiddles.)
To: EternalVigilance
>>>>>Supreme Court judge [Kagan] suspected of deception during confirmation hearingsI'm shocked! /sarc
12
posted on
05/22/2011 10:02:27 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: EternalVigilance
Supreme Court judge [Kagan] suspected of deception during confirmation hearingsThis FORKED-TONGUE PORKER will be poisoning the Supreme Court for years to come.
To: Mouton
To: EternalVigilance
A Socialist lie about her past? How shocking! /s
15
posted on
05/22/2011 10:04:35 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
To: Dead Corpse; Reagan Man
Sometimes the obvious doesn’t go without saying.
16
posted on
05/22/2011 10:06:10 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: EternalVigilance
Too late. This might have been blocked if the Republicans had fought it. But they lay down and rolled over—as usual.
17
posted on
05/22/2011 10:06:15 AM PDT
by
Cicero
To: MHGinTN
What the hell is a "Piarte", and if you mean "Pirate", why is Roberts one?
18
posted on
05/22/2011 10:06:44 AM PDT
by
DJ Frisat
(How's that change workin' out for ya, Obama voters?)
To: DJ Frisat
My old fingers meant PIRATE, and I’ll leave you to figure it out as the appointed black-robed oligarch enables the ‘changers in power’.
19
posted on
05/22/2011 10:09:08 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: MagUSNRET
This is why the Tea Party must take back the US Senate
20
posted on
05/22/2011 10:11:33 AM PDT
by
straps
(THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX)
To: EternalVigilance
We can say that about all DemocRAT nominees
21
posted on
05/22/2011 10:13:12 AM PDT
by
wild74
To: MHGinTN
I could have figured out the former if I had a clue what you meant by the latter. Sheesh. Nice informative response.
Good strategy — waste your time and mine by making arcane comments on a forum and leave it to others to figure out what you mean. Great communication skills!
22
posted on
05/22/2011 10:14:33 AM PDT
by
DJ Frisat
(How's that change workin' out for ya, Obama voters?)
To: wild74
Impeach and remove them all then.
One of the things we must do if we are to restore and preserve this republic is to make impeachment and removal the norm for every officer of government who refuses to follow the supreme law of the land, our Constitution.
23
posted on
05/22/2011 10:15:40 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: EternalVigilance
The lazy Republicans didn’t bother to fight her appointment. Why would they care that she lied? Answer: they don’t. We’ll not hear anymore about this in another day or so. We are stuck with this ultra liberal for the rest of her life.
24
posted on
05/22/2011 10:17:29 AM PDT
by
Graneros
("Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.")
To: EternalVigilance
Sad thing is, even with Republicans controlling 47 seats in the senate, more than enough to filibuster a nomination, if a Justice retired and Obama nominated another Kagan tomorrow, you would have 10 or so RINO’s that wouldn't support a filibuster.
25
posted on
05/22/2011 10:18:26 AM PDT
by
apillar
To: Mouton
Seems to me that Most members of congress could be recalled for malfeasance in office or at lease official misconduct. There is no representative government without representation of the interests of the electorate. Our government has failed. we are just afraid to admit it.
26
posted on
05/22/2011 10:18:39 AM PDT
by
Steamburg
(The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
To: EternalVigilance
What will or can be done?
27
posted on
05/22/2011 10:23:03 AM PDT
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: EternalVigilance; All
One instance (Eric Holder) - perhaps an oversight
Two instances (Eric Holder and Tim Geithner) - perhaps a coincidence
Three instances (Eric Holder, Tim Geithner & Elena Kagan)- definitely maybe a pattern...
To: EternalVigilance
No surprise! Too late now!
29
posted on
05/22/2011 10:30:53 AM PDT
by
rawhide
To: Jeff Chandler
Tell me about it. I forwarded a Doc to Graham re: Kagans conflict of interest and watched as he shrugged it off.
Will Lindseed excuse her lies to Congress as meaningless.
somehow a lying SC-Judge is not good for the reputation of the Supremes.
Can the rest of the Scotus FORCE her to recuse?
30
posted on
05/22/2011 10:31:48 AM PDT
by
Marty62
(Marty60)
To: EternalVigilance
Kagan brought Sharia Law to Harvard and took the millions of Dollars from the Saudis to do so. Kagan was an instrument to get Obamacare passed. What makes one think she lied? My God, it was so obvious a fifth grader could have researched it and proven her intent by actions. Congress/Senate are on the take is the only logical answer.
To: onyx
With this bunch of Republicans in power? Nothing.
But she should be impeached and removed.
32
posted on
05/22/2011 10:42:06 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: Voter#537
We’ve got another 609 days left of the maobama nightmare.
33
posted on
05/22/2011 10:42:36 AM PDT
by
Bowtie52
To: Mouton
“Seems to me she could be impeached for lying”
Impeached by whom? The gutless stupid party? The only republicans with balls are a few of the women, the rest are eunuchs.
34
posted on
05/22/2011 10:43:10 AM PDT
by
TxDas
(This above all, to thine ownself be true.)
To: MHGinTN
“Piarte”,”My old fingers meant PIRATE”
I thought you meant Pilate, as in Pontius Pilate.
35
posted on
05/22/2011 10:46:06 AM PDT
by
TxDas
(This above all, to thine ownself be true.)
To: Graneros
Elect only people who will impeach and remove every officer of government who won’t strictly adhere to the Constitution.
36
posted on
05/22/2011 10:46:43 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: EternalVigilance
IMPEACH!!! (And I don’t say that with every posting...)
37
posted on
05/22/2011 10:49:13 AM PDT
by
GVnana
To: EternalVigilance
Who’s that fat guy in the dress?
Oh sorry, it’s Kagan.
38
posted on
05/22/2011 10:55:03 AM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans freed the Slaves Month")
To: Mouton
Is not lying to congress a high crime. Seems to me she could be impeached for lying. Factually correct. This information should be retained and after 2012, when we get the Senate, impeachment should be started. If we do not reverse all of what this corrupt Administration has done America will never recover. This is serious business. We must dump all the RINOs we can in 2012 also.
To: GVnana
I don’t either. But I certainly agree.
40
posted on
05/22/2011 11:04:03 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: EternalVigilance
Only suspected? What a laugh!
41
posted on
05/22/2011 11:06:47 AM PDT
by
winkadink
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
To: EternalVigilance
Surprise surprise!!
I wrote many Senators pleading with them to filibuster. No dice. Now we live with the consequences. My guess is that Barry will not ALLOW her to recuse herself with the challenge to Obamacare - the keystone to his larger Government and control over EVERY aspect of our lives.
42
posted on
05/22/2011 11:07:06 AM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Voter#537
"Camping may well be right about the date but he was all wet about what was going to happen."
with all due respect, this statement is flat out false...the house can bring charges and write up articles of impeachment any damn time it chooses to do so...the senate then votes on impeachement...my question is, why has the house not brought up charges on any judges???
43
posted on
05/22/2011 11:23:13 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
To: joe fonebone
holy crap....my statement from another thread ended up here....sorry about that
44
posted on
05/22/2011 11:25:55 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
To: joe fonebone
lol...you forgot to apply the old carpenter’s rule...measure twice, cut once.
45
posted on
05/22/2011 11:35:04 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: EternalVigilance
So how will the media deride those looking into this issue?
Bitch-ers??
46
posted on
05/22/2011 12:01:20 PM PDT
by
Mark was here
(It's either Obama or America. There cannot be both.)
To: joe fonebone
why has the house not brought up charges on any judges??? The calculations do not produce enough political gain for them.
47
posted on
05/22/2011 12:01:24 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson)
To: Mark was here
48
posted on
05/22/2011 12:07:22 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Capital punishment is pro-life.)
To: EternalVigilance
No chit. I detected deception when I watched her testimony. They should have Borked her.
49
posted on
05/22/2011 12:25:40 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: ROCKLOBSTER
Confusing her with Kevin James?
50
posted on
05/22/2011 12:26:13 PM PDT
by
getarope
(Paddle faster, I hear banjo music!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson