Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Netanyahu speaks as America’s patriarch. Sarah Palin prepares to enter.
The Hill ^ | May 25, 2011 | Bernie Quigley

Posted on 05/25/2011 6:40:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Great news! Now we know that Mr 2ndDivisionVet as well as being a very wise Patriot, is also a man of great wealth.

BTW I could not be more happier to hear about all the great Palin news.

21 posted on 05/25/2011 9:17:37 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST, SARAH PALIN BEAUTIFUL INSIDE AND OUT, ALSO APPLE OF THE LORD`s EYE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
For the longest time, nothing seems to be happening because that time is spent building the foundation.

Correct. Had Palin truly taken the time to prepare to run, she would have been invisible after the last election while she studied everything from manufacturing, to history, to foreign policy.

She didn't. It was all public grandstanding full of empty platitudes. She's courageous, innately intelligent, positive, and moral, but that does not qualify her to be President. She obviously lacks an education.

Consider Reagan. He spent a decade learning about manufacturing and free markets with GE. By the time he delivered "the speech," he was already prepared to be President, before he was even governor of California. Reagan cited Montesquieu, Locke, and other libertarian thinkers underlying our system of government. He had historical perspective. Palin has no such preparation and it shows. Although I was excited about her prospects after her convention speech, SHE turned me off on her prospects.

22 posted on 05/25/2011 9:21:00 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Marie
I do not see this happening! With MB pretty much already deciding to run against Sarah, I only see negativity between the 2 from now on.

Not sure that Bachmann might just be a drag on the bottom of the ticket anyway. Let me just say that I see her in a different light now (speaking of MB)

At best all she is going to do is help split the vote.

In fact I will go a step farther and predict that even once MB gets out of the race, that she refuses to endorse Palin.

I hope to be proven wrong but I also see the same from Huck and McCain, jealousy I guess??

Like I said I hope to be proven wrong, it`s just what I believe...

23 posted on 05/25/2011 9:26:27 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST, SARAH PALIN BEAUTIFUL INSIDE AND OUT, ALSO APPLE OF THE LORD`s EYE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
Willie Nelson, have you heard him sing? That man clearly cannot sing.

The man has PERFECT PITCH, and I am personally quite familiar with the phenomenon. Certainly Willie can sing, and he sings exactly on key. You just don't like the tone/timbre of his voice, and I can understand that.

I know it's just an analogy, but that you are unable to differentiate not liking the tone of a guy's voice from the guy not being able to sing, makes me wonder if you aren't as deluded when it comes to recognizing the correct "alignment of the stars."

24 posted on 05/25/2011 9:29:27 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Then why are her speeches so much better, and her interviews so much more insightful than those of her competitors, if she is so “uneducated? I think she’s more than ready. Is she Reagan? No. But is she better than anyone since, and will she make America swell with pride to see her as President? To me, it’s a definite YES. Bob


25 posted on 05/25/2011 9:30:44 AM PDT by alstewartfan (He was searching their eyes. If he cant find his anthem, Will he buy the compromise? Harry Chapin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

What a bunch of horse crap!!!

Sarah Palin has not really made any gaffs, it`s all been manufactured by MSM and you bought into it hook line and sinker.

Can you imagine if Palin had not known the situation with Israel like Cain?? And if she had said what Bachmann had said about the famous battle in wrong State?

Quit getting your news from Charles Krauthammer and you may recover


26 posted on 05/25/2011 9:30:57 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST, SARAH PALIN BEAUTIFUL INSIDE AND OUT, ALSO APPLE OF THE LORD`s EYE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Take a lesson, pup. School is about to start.

;-\

27 posted on 05/25/2011 9:31:59 AM PDT by Gargantua (Palin 2012 ~ "Going Oval" ©2010 by Gargantua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah Is In Good Company


28 posted on 05/25/2011 9:32:36 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Correct. Had Palin truly taken the time to prepare to run, she would have been invisible after the last election while she studied everything from manufacturing, to history, to foreign policy.

You are assuming again. Palin is well versed in all those categories. I don't know how staying invisible would help her. Palin isn't as ill-informed as you've been led to believe. She has continued to prove her bona fides building on her terrific past public service by taking on the Obama regime on issue after issue. She can also be credited with much of the 2010 election victories, along with the tea party movement. I'm grateful that she had the courage to step up the pressure on Obama when much of the GOP establishment sat on their hands.

29 posted on 05/25/2011 9:34:56 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
Watch and learn. If you're lucky, you aren't so "stuck on thick" that you can't observe the coming month-to-two-months of historically unprecedented political genius and have it help mold your future opinions.

I'm pulling for you, kiddo. Really and truly.

;-\

30 posted on 05/25/2011 9:38:08 AM PDT by Gargantua (Palin 2012 ~ "Going Oval" ©2010 by Gargantua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

That she just came in such a strong second at an Iowa straw poll dinner is striking. With Cain there in person speaking, his 55% of the vote was to be expected. But Palin with 38%? Either she’s got a very effective stealth grassroots team at work, she’s got a strength in Iowa nobody has understood, or just the hint of a whisper of her new film to be released—signally her run and her coming to Iowa—is all that it took.

Any one of those reasons is encouraging indeed. (IMO Cain is the like-Trump-not-a-pol flavor of the month who won’t sustain his popularity into the caucuses.)


31 posted on 05/25/2011 9:38:33 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

*signalling*


32 posted on 05/25/2011 9:39:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
"Grandstanding full of empty platitudes" -- CO, you really disappoint me. I have a keen ear for platitudes, and one of the things I like best about Palin is that she -- like Reagan did -- avoids platitudes.

You want platitudes (which are by definition, empty -- "empty platitudes" is redundant), listen to Romney. Listen to Obama.

"Death panels" was red meat that influenced the political tide.

"Drill here, drill now" is the antithesis of a platitude.

For an example of a platitude -- something that conveys fluff, air, and loads of pure assumption -- ponder this statement:

Consider Reagan. He spent a decade learning about manufacturing and free markets with GE. By the time he delivered "the speech," he was already prepared to be President, before he was even governor of California.

33 posted on 05/25/2011 9:41:50 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

38% is nice to see but I don’t put much stock in polls at this point. Cain receiving a 55% attests to that reality. While I like Herman Cain, he has little chance of garnering the nomination. If he were to get elected, Cain would be tempted to fill his administration with party insiders to help him navigate the Washington scene. That is exactly the opposite of what I want to see happen. I believe Palin will go to outsiders to help her take on the Washington establishment. That’s about the only way we’ll be able to affect real change in our government.


34 posted on 05/25/2011 9:58:48 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Things are still very fluid, of course, but such party-insider dinner-straw polls are more relevant in IA because they more closely mimic the caucus experience than a primary.

Palin’s been written off in IA as a too-late has-been who has left Iowans feeling irreparably snubbed. That she comes on so strong in such an event at least says that none of that is true at all.


35 posted on 05/25/2011 10:02:50 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

Why do you think any of that? I suspect Bachmann won’t risk her current seat for a super long-shot, and that’s what her run would be, especially with Palin in. I actually see her as working well with Palin in supporting the latter’s run.

Was Bachmann a pure stalking-horse placeholder? No, as I think she’d have been more tempted to run if Palin had opted not to. It’s looking like Palin will jump in, however, and a Palin presidency could spring Bachmann from the situation of being in a difficult state for a conservative to move up the political ladder. She could either be in the House leadership or a Palin cabinet with a GOP victory in 2012.


36 posted on 05/25/2011 10:06:22 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

You’re talking about the political version of preparation meeting opportunity (or need or call or whatever).


37 posted on 05/25/2011 10:07:22 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Ha!

I didn’t say I don’t love to hear Willie sing. I could listen him all day... I have! Willie is the MAN!

As far as the alignment of the stars go. They either align or they don’t. I’m not saying it won’t happen.

Two possibilities.

They align.
They don’t align.


38 posted on 05/25/2011 10:08:58 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

I don’t know what “stuck on thick” means.

But I did make a BBQ sauce last year that would accomplish that!

You are making the mistake of thinking I am anti-Palin.

I am pro Constitution, small government, Pro Liberty, rabidly pro 1st, 2nd and fourth amendment.

I think government at all levels, from neighborhood association to Federal is to powerful. I blame my idiot neighbors.

So I want a candidate who will not just reflect my views. Not just win. I want a candidate who will change the debate. Make individuals sovereign and government serfs and servants.

That’s what I want.


39 posted on 05/25/2011 10:18:23 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

The huge fulcrum points of history happen with odd confluences of events and people and take on an unstoppable momentum of their own.


40 posted on 05/25/2011 10:22:09 AM PDT by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson