Skip to comments.NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS
Posted on 05/26/2011 8:31:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS FOR PRESIDENT!!
This message is intended for those posters on FR who seem to have missed my prior statements in this regard and insist on advocating for these bastards.
I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!!
Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!! And I don't care how long you've been here!!
Has his church ever disagreed with him?
Thank you Jim
Priest, Missionary, Bishop, Stake President, personal meetings with the with the holy prophet of the church.
Romney was a powerful religious leader within the church as far as I know, and it was you that brought Catholics in as though Romney was some renegade Bishop that was in rebellion with the higher leadership, although none of us have ever seen the evidence of that battle.
Romney did represent the church in all of those roles.
It means something when Bishop Romney is spreading the message and the church says nothing.
It also says something when their position seems to be the exact one that the proabortion movement was pushing before RoevWade.
I find the Romney family, and the church, less than pro-life at this point.
Got it. You want to use Romney to bash the Mormon Church.
Even you see the Mormon religion as being, not exactly what most of us would call pro-life.
It does seem like an awfully weak position for official religious doctrine, it is taken from the old abortion movement, and it is a position that leaves wiggle room for a modern politician in a campaign, but as the formal doctrine of a religion? It is weak.
thanks, between crackle and netflicks just about all of them are available 24/7
Put the other way around, it is Mitt who has contradicted what the Momron leadership have stated as their ‘official position’. But I really can’t say that means a lot since the past ‘president/prophet’ of LDS inc was a proven deceiver who tried to lie his way past the Lorenzo Snow couplet when Larry King and Time magazine questioned him on it. But there is a disconnect between what mormons as a people say and what they show with their votes, sadly.
I don’t support those things or those candidates either.
I’m also guessing that the Romney-bots have been out in full force ever since Romney’s announcement.
Yeah, what’s to become of us that almost don’t care anymore?
Like my wife and I, we’re not out there campaigning for Romney or Giuliani, but we can’t accept Ron Paul, Palin, Cain or Bachmann, either.
As a matter of fact, she doesn’t like anyone that’s running. She says she’s staying home. This is the least interested that I’ve seen her since 1996 when we both stayed home. I am not real excited, either. I despise candidates like Romney and Giuliani, but it’s hard to get excited about Reality TV stars, MILFesotans, Conspiracy Theorists and virtually unknown CEOs.
They are dead Jim....
How about a Global Warming Hoax Denier?
If you think this, then it is obvious you are not paying any attention at all to the candidates and instead are merely rote regurgitating an ignorance based political dogma force fed you by some fridge class political huckster.
What candidate should I be paying attention to then? Let’s see.
I see, actually learning about the candidates is too much work for you. So much easier to sit around posting the same ignorance based political dogmas over and over then bothering to learn even the most basic facts.
Answer the f’ing question, dickhead. You contacted ME. Speak up.
By posting that you indicated you have no clue at all what you are talking about.
So, instead of posting drivel, try spending your time learning about the candidates instead.
Your fundamental ignorance of even the most basic facts about the candidates is inexcusable in a supposedly responsible citizen of this Republic.