Skip to comments.NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS
Posted on 05/26/2011 8:31:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS FOR PRESIDENT!!
This message is intended for those posters on FR who seem to have missed my prior statements in this regard and insist on advocating for these bastards.
I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!!
Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!! And I don't care how long you've been here!!
Not so much hate, but more mistrust. Basically, its cause his religion is a cult. Men can become God; God was a man. Christ isnt a Diety. Book Of Mormon has more authority than the Bible. They deny the Trinity. They deny a literal Hell. They believe there are many gods. They baptize the dead. They believe that Jesus and Satan were brothers. They believe in salvation by good works and deeds. The status of women is monumentally misogynistic (Google licked cupcakes). Thats the tip of the iceberg.
Evangelicals would rather have America led by Christians, as it was when established in the 1700s.
BTW, all the "Founding Fathers demanded mormon church membership". REALLY!
"Having learned the truth in the spirit world, the Founding Fathers returned to Wilford Woodruff and asked if he would have their temple work done for them so they could have in their lives the same blessing the people living on earth enjoyed," explained Elder Pinnock. "The gospel provides the potential for exaltation for us all. It incorporates all truth, and we must have the vision of this great work and what it does for mankind - both the living and the dead."
That's an interesting comparison for your fellow FReepers. I've personally seen how homosexuality has destroyed families. While you may think it's admirable to support the practice of perversion in the end it will perpetuate their misery. If you really cared you should seek reparative therapy for your niece..no one is born that way.
The RINOs need to be put out to pasture so the GOP can return to it’s conservative roots. It’s almost a case of saving the GOP from itself, but if this cannot be done, then conservatives need to find a third-party (Tea Party) candidate that they can stand behind.
Thanks for the post. It does happen for sure. That’s why I never condemn Dick Cheney for his positions on this stuff. The man has a real dilemma on his hands too, but he is one of the best we have ever had in office imho.
Going, going, gone!!
Agreed. We have much to do from this point on.
Not sure how you took my comments to mean that I was condemning my fellow FReepers or that I somehow ‘support’ perversion, but I am sad that you have taken it that way. You have taken my comments out of context here.
I don’t know many freepers that support Phelps quite frankly, but if you want to talk about perversion, that man is the very definition of perversion imho.
As far as my neice is concerned...your thoughts have been noted.
I have sister who is a homosexual, and I am often on threads that do not "make fun of gays" or "condemn them to hell like some Fred Phelps nut". Nor do I withdraw from the issue. There is another way. One can be concerned and involved on the threads that address this issue and not be one of the above.
Dang, I missed the ZOT last night.
I always miss the ZOTS!!!
Amen to what you said!
LOL - yep, just like that!
Love it! Although it is fun to beat up on them.
“Nor do I withdraw from the issue. There is another way. One can be concerned and involved on the threads that address this issue and not be one of the above.”
That’s a very good point. I do find myself afraid of entering some of those threads sometimes. The reply post to me above from Clint N. Suhks is one reason why I avoid them. He/she has taken my comments completely out of context and then gone on to insinuate something sinister into what I said. I specifically said I didn’t support the homosexual agenda machine or homosexual marriage or candidates that do..how much clearer can I get....LOL?
You compared, at least some, to Fred Phelps did you not? Reread your original post. I certainly didn't pull it out of thin air. Fred Phelps is highly condemned on FR and linking any of your fellow FReepers to him is the kind of thing they look for at Media Matters to smear us.
or that I somehow support perversion
You posted on a thread against the support of homosexuality. You revealed without being asked that you support your homosexual niece. If you are not actively helping her leave her perversion you are tacitly supporting it. It's clear you are here defending her honor. That's all I am saying.
Do you think that robbery laws have reduced the number of robberies?
Do you think that rape laws have reduced the number of rapes?
Do you think that murder laws have reduced the number of murders?
Do you think that anti-porn laws have reduced porn inspired crime?
We'll never know because no one ever comes forward and says "I would have done that except it was against the law. Your questions are pat libertarian tripe. They don't work on me.
Democracy is designed for a moral people,
Democracy is mob rule. I live in a Republic.
Sharia is probably the ultimate form of government enforced morality. How's that working out?
The last guy that pulled that line was banned.
Buh Bye Tard...
I agreed with Clint’s post. What did you think was incorrect about it?
I cast a write in vote for Duncan Hunter rather than voting for McC.
Just think of yourself as being on the leading edge of FR opinion.
The GWB administration sure turned out to be RINO central.
And I have seen lots of posts, especially in threads like this, insisting that we must vote third party if a RINO is nominated, regardless of whether that has the effect of reelecting Obama.
What to do, what to do.....
That is scary. It has to make God sad, don’t you think?
Somebody was either overtired and not thinking right, completely clueless, or doin’ too much of the funny stuff.
I’ll take #3 for $500, Alex.
So, you are comparing conservatives who oppose the Homosexual Agenda to Fred Phelps?
Why not just compare us to the Taliban?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Are you serious???
They are pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marriage, pro-porn; pro-prostitution, no restrictions of any kind on the above.
Those all ARE moral issues, you know.
Golly. You must have missed post 545
How can you not know who Jim Rob is????
d’oh. You sure picked the wrong tree to bark up.
That is the right attitude, Jim.
For too many years and in too many elections, the progressive Republicans have counted on our submissive support of the RINO candidates they have put up.
It is time to eradicate them from the Republican party, or start our own and leave them behind on the trash heap.
So you support homosexuality and the fact that it kills and the average lifespan is only 50 years of age? You support that they have higher drug and alcohol use and domestic violence?
The only areas I see that libertarians have in common with conservatives if in limited government, and there is disagreement as to what should be limited in it.
I don’t see how that’s going to work when the moral issues are the biggest obstacles.
No pro-abortion, no pro-homosexual marriage, no pro porn and prostitution, no open borders, and although I think the war on drugs has not worked, I am not in favor of legalizing recreational drugs.
Where’s the agreement except that both of us want less government oversight in our lives?
Amen. RINOs don’t need FR for support, they have TV, newspapers, lefty blogs etc all tacitly on their side (until close to elections of course).
This has to be about the 2,862nd time you’ve had to post this, and some (soon to be zotted) freeper wannabes STILL don’t get it.
Wow some people are dense, aren’t they?
You know, comparing moral people who support laws like we used to have against immorality, does not equate to sharia.
Almost every law on the books is a law that regulates moral behavior. Murder is a moral issue and illegal. Should we remove the laws for that because it has a religious basis?
What about theft? That's a moral issue grounded in religion.
Lying and perjury? Same there.
Vandalism and destruction of another's property? That's a moral issue based in religion.
Take a look at all the laws which regulated moral behavior at the time the Constitution was written. Those were not considered unconstitutional.
I've never seen it work out well for someone who implies that a legal system based on the Judeo-Christian value system is equivalent to islam and sharia.
Good luck with that.
Oh, and IBTZ.....
I understand how you could take my post on Phelps, but it certainly wasn’t meant the way you took it...nor did it deserve your nasty insinuations.
My neice is a grown woman of 27. I love her, but I do not ‘support’ her lifestyle. How much clearer can I get?
I have no problem with so-called civil unions for homosexuals, but I want the definition of marriage to stay the same. Abortion is murder, IMO. Pornography and prostitution is for losers.
I may lose some libertarian credentials but I would be okay with abortion being illegal in almost all cases.
You libertarians are so predictable, sooner or later you ALWAYS compare conservatives to Islamofascists.
I think JR should quit being so wishy-washy, don’t you? ;p
Darkwing104 has a viking kitty ping list. Sign up, and you’ll get pinged on most if not all zots.
PS Moral clarity: It’s what’s for OUR FUTURE. Bravo, JR!
“Was FR strong for Bush in 2000?”
Over Gore????? Hellooooo...
Maybe he’s a little slow sometimes. “/S”
BT & JR:
How are you? Doing anything great for the weekend?
Hope to see you soon.
Not sure why you included me in this post. I specifically have said that I am against the homosexual agenda and will not be voting or supporting any candidate that does.
I wrote the post more to explain why I avoid the issue sometimes. It was probably not the most artfully constructed vanity and some here have really taken it the wrong way and for that I apologize.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.