Skip to comments.NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS
Posted on 05/26/2011 8:31:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
And I thought I had no life! Pointless, repeated spamming is the highlight of his day, no doubt.
My neighbor just brought some feral hog BBQ over for us to eat later. I had a bit and it is yummy, kind of like dry regular pork. I have to figure what to make with it in a few minutes. We still have about two quarts of tater salad and I may warm up some beans.
...to people who ony think his efforts are funny in a pathetic way.
He needs to crawl back down the stairs to the basement and stuff more pizza in his face!
That’s cool! Someone finally figured out what to do with all
those wild pigs running around your area! LOL!
Just made me hungry for BBQ! :)
Aaaah, thanks, and yes a Godzilla facepalm is epic.
You’re welcome, O Classic One and favorite Movie Monster.
“This house is clean” (Amityville ref...)
Back from a trip — thank you, thank you, thank you.
Bishop Romney says that the church is not pro-life, the homosexual thing (and the church) I don’t know about, but I do know that Romney was and is a high ranking figure in the church.
I am not impressed with Romney’s flip flopping. He’s trying to look like a conservative in spite of his past policies as governor of Massachusetts. Too much “I was for it, but later I was against it”. Sound familiar? Is it a Massachusetts politician thing? No thanks, Mitt. Keep your faux Mormon (statement not a slam against Mormons in general).
He’s banned already.
first words when I read this crap from the troll was what a loser, does this not have a life , I mean he finds the time to register and make posts for what?
What a sad pathetic little troll
Good that it was banned. I just deleted the message this time.
Wow..that was quick. The time on that freepmail is 8:53AM
now that is one pathetic sad little person who has no life.
Then these perverts like him say he is perfectly mentally normal, WTH they honestly do not understand that when they send crap like this fool does then they are only backing up what most think of them and that is a sad little pathetic loser looking for attention who has severe mental problems
He does it because he can clearly see by the posts about him that it riles people. If he didn’t get a “rise” out of posters, he’d quit.
Troll has already been banned, thanks
Well I wish he would post in the forum! hehe We need a toy every now and then.
That was quick. I didn’t even get to read his drivel.
I find it funny that anyone could get so upset and have that much time to posts crap like that and spend time reading the posts.
He seriously has no life, oh and yes he needs to seek mental help and for the sad pathetic no life loser troll if he is reading this.
Poking mans asses is sick now go book yourself into a mental institution
The more you talk, the more he gets his jollies. Just sayin'.
He’s a real loser if he thinks that he’s actually riling anybody.
I think it’s funny.
Sheesh, some people give themselves too much credit.
I’ve just started deleting his FReepmails without reading them. They never say anything different anyway and I’m not going to let him waste my time.
Thank you sir.
In a rush to make the play on words, which I admit was clever, you have missed the argument.
The issue was not whether banning this practice or that perversion was something we wanted. GraceC's original point was about the practicality of enforcement. And yes, as it turns out, we have many laws on the books that deal with crimes inside ones home, and we are enforcing them just fine.
Now back to your question about oral sex. I will answer it this way. A few years ago, a German pervert killed and ate another German pervert... with his consent, in the privacy of his bedroom. Do I want the police "in our bedrooms" to ensure that does not happen again? You bet!
We have to allow society to draw moral lines that can only be crossed illegally. My belief is that, over time, a free society will draw the lines appropriately.
If I ever push those views, please kick me off!
Don’t be racist and push some supposed republican just because he’s black! Anybody involved in the private group called the Federal Reserve should not be pres.
“Although it hasn’t gotten much attention, he was actually chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank in the mid-1990s. That’s the epitome of the Establishment and the opposite of the tea party.
From 1992 to 1996, Herman served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in the capacities of deputy chairman and then chairman of the Board. Fed directors are dedicated representatives of Main Street business, community development, organized labor and financial services sectors who agree to give their time to help the Federal Reserve understand the economy and to oversee our operations.
I remember that. One answered the other's newspaper ad IIRC. Those were two sick b@#$%^ds.
I know many on FR would disagree with some of this, but it seems to me an essentially pro-life position. I don't know how Romney could say it's not pro-life, for sure.
Bishop Romney was over other Bishops, and he has decades of teaching and missionary work on Mormon doctrine, and non of us have ever heard of a hint of dispute between his teachings and those of his church.
Romney stated in an interview that his church does not say that Mormons should be pro-life, and that some of it’s leaders are known as pro-choice.
Governor Mitt Romney: And every Mormon should be pro-life?
Jan Mickelson: If thats what your Church says.
Governor Mitt Romney: Thats not what my Church says! There are leaders of my Church who are pro-choice. Youre wrong. Thats your problem.
Jan Mickelson: No thats false logic. Your Churchs official position is pro-life.
Governor Mitt Romney: No, no-no, no no. We can continue that conversation
Jan Mickelson: We only have about 30 seconds. Unless you want to stay longer.
Governor Mitt Romney: Ive got to run.
Yes, it is true that prominent Mormon politicians have been pro-choice, as he himself was. But that doesn't make the church's position pro-choice. Just ask the Pope and Catholic bishops about that one.
Godzilla, King of Monsters and Monster Zero are on TCM tonight starting at 8 PM Eastern. Rodan is also on.
You described a high level of flexibility in the official Mormon stance on abortion, I don’t think that the Catholic church does that does it?
Wouldn’t an openly pro-choce Catholic Bishop, raised by what Mitt claims was an early pro-abortion Senate candidate called his mother, be widely considered and known as being in rebellion from the leadership of his church?
Romney in reality is not a devout Mormon, as evidenced by his using the institution of marriage and family to barter with sexual degenerates in order to obtain their support for his run at the mass governorship. Now LDS inc may give a duplicitous scumbag like Mitt Romney a pass ... but I don’t think so. Sadly, too many Mormons vote for this sort of duplicitous pondscum because he is professing Mormonism while not actually following even that religion!
Has his church ever disagreed with him?
Thank you Jim
Priest, Missionary, Bishop, Stake President, personal meetings with the with the holy prophet of the church.
Romney was a powerful religious leader within the church as far as I know, and it was you that brought Catholics in as though Romney was some renegade Bishop that was in rebellion with the higher leadership, although none of us have ever seen the evidence of that battle.
Romney did represent the church in all of those roles.
It means something when Bishop Romney is spreading the message and the church says nothing.
It also says something when their position seems to be the exact one that the proabortion movement was pushing before RoevWade.
I find the Romney family, and the church, less than pro-life at this point.
Got it. You want to use Romney to bash the Mormon Church.
Even you see the Mormon religion as being, not exactly what most of us would call pro-life.
It does seem like an awfully weak position for official religious doctrine, it is taken from the old abortion movement, and it is a position that leaves wiggle room for a modern politician in a campaign, but as the formal doctrine of a religion? It is weak.
thanks, between crackle and netflicks just about all of them are available 24/7
Put the other way around, it is Mitt who has contradicted what the Momron leadership have stated as their ‘official position’. But I really can’t say that means a lot since the past ‘president/prophet’ of LDS inc was a proven deceiver who tried to lie his way past the Lorenzo Snow couplet when Larry King and Time magazine questioned him on it. But there is a disconnect between what mormons as a people say and what they show with their votes, sadly.
I don’t support those things or those candidates either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.