Skip to comments.Why did GOOGLE minimize Memorial Day?
Posted on 05/30/2011 4:57:29 AM PDT by plangent
Google, today, put up it's standard logo with no adornment. Just a small U.S. flag at the bottom of the page with a yellow ribbon. Compare this minimalist observance with the highly decorated GOOGLE logo commemorating all sorts of people and occasions -- usually avoiding anything that is considered patriotic.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Why do you think?
Google ... isn’t that the site that teaches you the birthdays of all the Latin American communist artists?
There WAS one last year ... rockin' aroun' the christmas tree ad nauseum
Yahoo did the same thing. There is NOTHING commemorating Memorial Day - not even a flag.
I’m so tired of Yahoo - and I never, ever use Google.
until someone comes up with a conservative search engine, i guess you’ll have to use ms(nbc) bing
Because they’re Google, LOL.
But seriously, that’s the first thing I noticed and wondered. If they’re going to put it on there, why the tiny logo.
Google is an international search engine, granted...but based in US and it’s pretty obvious they’re minimizing the holiday (Bing has a nice tribute...yahoo has zilch.)
Here’s a link to a commercial website I just visited and noticed they had changed their logo to reflect Memorial Day.
Bing had a great Blue Angels photo the other day. The Indy 500 pic from yesterday was cool too.
Google didn’t want to offend our enemies. It’s all of a pattern. No Christmas references if at all possible, no Easter, no mention of American good in any sort, our Judeo Christian values are so passee, don’t you know. They have a huge list of no/no’s, and Jesus is right up at the top. It must be a huge disappointment that the NATO strike that allegedly killed civilians the other day was made by British planes. Maybe they can rework that and say Bush did it. If they can turn Afghanistan/Iraq into Vietnam redux they will. The hell with the slaughter of innocents. Obama is running for reelection, and that’s all that matters. Shove it down America’s collective throats and drown out common sense. And by the way, he’s coming for our guns...under the radar at the moment.
you’re right. i changed the bing.com preference from united states to taiwan. and the background image disappear..
perhaps google should do something like that, if they want to attract more people.
I heard Budweiser has never changed their can,...except for this Memorial Day as a tribute to wounded warriors. Haven’t seen it yet.
I’ve found that I go to Bing every morning just to see what photo they have up for the day.
Central Vacuum is a family bidness run by a VN Vet and his wife. I sent them a Thanks.
(I know this because I read the “About Us” section after seeing your post!)...Thank You.
Yes, and lots of websites that I visit deliver customized ads down to my neighborhood level, which they can tell from my IP address. Google has the ability to tell who's request is coming from the US, and who is from overseas.
I did a search yesterday on Google with FR as one of the terms yet it offered me the option to eliminate all FR.com results. I have never seen that before.
Part of the reason Google can and does do the things they do is that they’re “Google.” In my job I have to deal with Google, and they treat their customers like they treat those who use their search engine...they really don’t care what you think, they’re the biggest (and they are the best) search engine...nobody is going to overcome them, so they really don’t have to care what “we” think.
Sort of like eBay...lots of others have tried to start auction sites, but success attracts numbers, and soon you’re really the only game in town. Google has that advantage, and they know it. Bing is fine, but it’s not google, and if you’re doing serious web searches you almost have to use Google. Advertisers know this too, so that’s why they keep advertising on google. It is what it is.
Google = Bunch of candy-assed metrosexual liberals.
I use Start Page for searches. They are working out just fine. They do not record your IP address.
You wrote: “Google didnt want to offend our enemies. Its all of a pattern. No Christmas references if at all possible, no Easter, no mention of American good in any sort, our Judeo Christian values are so passee, dont you know.”
You may be one who will appreciate this. bttt (It’s from Memorial Day 2007 but the comments are “ageless”):
May 29, 2007
For Memorial Day
Memorial Day — like any holy-day — is not a remembrance of things past, but of things present; specifically, it is a remembrance of things surpassed, or of the things that surpass us. Specifically, it is an occasion for vertical recollection of a divine archetype that is present now — can only be present now — but requires the substance of ritual in order to vividly apprehend and renew it.
We remember our heroes because they illuminate the eternal realm of the heroic, a realm that we must treasure and venerate if we are to survive as a culture. Not only is the hero a transcendent archetype, but he is only heroic because he has sacrificed something in defense of another archetype — truth, liberty, beauty, the good, etc. In the absence of this true formulation, neither the heroic nor his sacrifice make any sense at all. This is why to “deconstruct,” say, George Washington, is not just an attack on the father of our country, but on fatherhood, God, and the realm of transcendent (i.e., the Real) in general.
Will just left a lengthy comment that touches on many of the things I wanted to write about this morning. I will simply quote him:
“Memorial Day is certainly for honoring the fallen heroes of our military, and John Edwards’ attempt to bastardize it for political ends is cheap to the point of ‘deconstruction’ profanity. Like most leftist stunts, it focuses on something that is, in the highest spiritual sense, truly ceremonial and attempts to tear away its divine resonance.
“So I was thinking, in what way is Memorial Day larger than it is — as all spiritual ceremonies truly are? Well, as has been pointed out here, it’s obvious that Memorial Day is a day for celebrating, honoring, remembering what heroism really means — courageous self-sacrifice in the name higher ideals, principles, which are, to be sure, *spiritual* ideals and principles. So in one sense, our fallen military heroes are symbolic of this ideal. They are the most vivid, the most tangible representation of this ideal that we have before us. There are others, of course, who likewise are vivid, in-the-flesh symbols of this spiritual ideal: police, firefighters, the occasional citizen who rises to the heroic occasion and is so publicly honored. There is no hero, however, quite as vivid, quite so symbolic of self-sacrificing virtue than the military hero.
“The great wonder of it, of course, is that our fallen heroes are not paintings, statues, images — they were and are human. They are us. And still they are symbols, ideals in the flesh — destiny selected them to serve this role. That role is to remind us that we all are potential self-sacrificing heroes, that we all are of divine essence. Somehow, on some level, we must realize this, otherwise we wouldn’t have a day for honoring our fallen heroes.
“The other day Bob alluded to the some of the symbolic threads in the Wizard of Oz. Overview-wise, I have long seen WoO as a tale of a journey into the Realm of Divine Archetypes wherein we (through Dorothy) see ourselves, and others, in our real, divine essence. In her eyes, her Kansas friends and acquaintances became Scarecrow, Lion, Tin Man — became, in effect, their true selves, all on a heroic quest to reclaim their spiritual birthright. In Kansas, they were just dusty average Joes. In the Higher Realm, they were their real selves, knights, heroes.
“Most of us are Kansans. We do not have a symbolic public role to play. And yet there are countless souls who commit unseen (by the public) acts of tremendous self-sacrifice and heroism, whose deeds will never be acknowledged — in some cases, not by a single other — in this world. Our military heroes remind us that such heroism is possible. The secular attempt to ‘deconstruct’ military heroism is no less than an attempt to sever us from our Oz, our spiritual reality. We need daily remind ourselves that we are on the yellow brick road of our personal heroic quest. And we need to remind ourselves that, though our personal acts of heroism may never be acclaimed in this life, we will, in the fullness of time, be acknowledged as the heroes we imagine ourselves to be.”
About the only thing I can add is that John Edwards is a yellow prick load.
As a prelude.... I guess it’s not a prelude anymore.... But anyway, I am reminded of a couple of particularly resonant lines in Van der Leun’s beautiful piece yesterday, Small Flags: “These days we resent, it seems, having [cemeteries] fill at all, clinging to our tiny lives with a passion that passes all understanding; clinging to our large liberty with the belief that all payments on such a loan will be interest-free and deferred for at least 100 years.”
Elsewhere he writes, “It is not, of course, that the size of the sacrifice has been reduced. That remains the largest gift one free man may give to the country that sustained him. It is instead the regard of the country for whom the sacrifices were made that has gotten smaller, eroded by the self-love that the secular celebrate above all other values” (emphasis mine).
Ven der Leun touches on many themes that could be expanded into entire posts: the desperate clinging to our tiny lives; the earthly passion that passes all understanding since it denies transcendence; the notion that liberty is free (even less costly than air or water, which at least require the sacrifice of toilet tissue); that death is the greatest gift one man can give another; and that self-love is the polar opposite of true love and sacrifice, and that which causes the country to contract vertically even as it expands in every other way.
Sacred, sacrament, and sacrifice are all etymologically linked; all are derived from sacer, or to the holy and mysterious. This itself is interesting, for holy, of course, implies wholeness, and wholeness is indeed a portal to mystery, just as “partness” is a perpetual riddle that verges on the bizarre. For example, a psychotic person lives in a bizarre world of disconnected objects and experiences that he cannot synthesize into unity, or wholeness. Often he will superimpose a false unity in the form of paranoid delusions — something we transparently see in a collective form on the left. Paranoia is “a false wholeness,” but it is never far from the nameless dread that sponsors it.
A couple of days ago I noted the truism that leftist thought — even more than being ruled by emotion — is primarily iconic. Or one might say that the left simply has very passionate feelings about its icons, which they confuse with “thoughts.” You can see this same phenomenon in our recent deust-up with the atheist folks, who are also (ironically, but not really) ruled by overpowering feelings about their own sacred icons. Point out where they are wrong, and they hysterically accuse you of calling them animals and depriving them of the humanity which they deprive themselves. Rational they are not. Or, at the very least, the more sober among them prove the adage that there is a form of madness that consists of losing everything with the exception of one’s reason.
Back to the leftists. A disturbing number of them not only believe that Islamic terrorists are not engaged in a global war against Western civilization (or “civilization,” for short), but that the United States government itself engineered 9-11. Van der Leun alludes to this, where he writes of how increasing numbers of American asses with Rosie-colored glasses prefer “to take refuge in the unbalanced belief that 9/11 was actually something planned and executed by the American government. Why many of my fellow Americans prefer this ‘explanation’ is something that I once felt was beyond comprehension.
Now I see it is just another comfortable position taken up by those for whom the habits of automatic treason have become just another fashionable denigration of the country that has made their liberty to believe the worst of it not only possible but popular.”
Yes, the left is insane, but exactly kind of insanity is this? How have they become so detached from reality?
It has to do with the specific reality from which they have become detached. As another fine example of the shallowness and naivete of atheist thought, one of them writes that
“Millions and millions of people died in Russia and China under communist governments — and those governments were both secular and atheistic, right? So weren’t all of those people killed in the name of atheism and secularism? No. Atheism itself isn’t a principle, cause, philosophy, or belief system which people fight, die, or kill for. Being killed by an atheist is no more being killed in the name of atheism than being killed by a tall person is being killed in the name of tallness.”
This looks like a banal statement — which it unavoidably is — and yet, it is quite sinister in its implications, and illuminates all of Van der Leun’s points mentioned above. First, atheism is petty and unworthy of man. No one would kill for it, just as no one would die for it, since it is the substance of meaninglessness, precisely. Why sacrifice one’s life for the principle that there are no transcendent principles worth dying for?
The least of atheism’s baleful effects is that it automatically makes the hero a fool because there is nothing worth defending. The more catastrophic effect is that it leaves the field open to evil-doers who are openly hostile to the transcendent principles that animate our uniquely decent and beautiful civilization. This is why you see an Old Europe that is supine before the barbarians in its midst who wish to destroy it. Socialism has nothing to do with “generosity” or selflessness; rather, it is the quintessence of selfishness, and diminishes a man down to the conviction that his animal needs should be provided for by someone else. The only thing that can rouse his passion is a threat to his entitlements. Only if the Islamists were to threaten their 12 weeks of paid vacation would they be taken seriously by socialist EUnuchs.
This is also why, as Ven der Leun writes, the habits of automatic treason have become just another fashionable denigration of the country that has made their liberty to believe the worst of it not only possible but popular. As I noted yesterday, this is the complete and utter cynicism that results from destroying the reality of the vertical and clinging to one’s puny life with the passion that passes understanding.
For just as wholeness, the One, is associated with the peace that passes understanding, the exile from this real human world into the bizarre and fragmented world of the secular left brings not so much the passion that passes understanding, but the passion that cannot comprehend itself because it has no vector or direction beyond the self. In fact, nothing can be understood in the absence of that which it is converging upon, which reveals its meaning. To systematically deny the vertical is to obliterate the possibility of meaning and truth, which is obvious; however, it is also to destroy the hero and that transcendent reality for which he is willing to sacrifice his life.
Only in such a debased and (literally this time) subhuman world can a truly malevolent soul such as John Edwards be considered fit to rule, for there is nothing odd about cannibals electing a cannibal king — or of the utterly cynical and self-absorbed voting for one of their own.
Of the sacred, Schuon writes that it is in the first place “attached to the transcendent order, secondly, possesses the character of absolute certainty and, thirdly, eludes the comprehension and control of the ordinary human mind. Imagine a tree whose leaves, having no kind of direct knowledge about the root, hold a discussion about whether or not a root exists and what its form is if it does: if a voice then came from the root telling them that the root does exist and what its form is, that message would be sacred.”
Again, the message is sacred and holy because it is transcendent and relates knowledge of the whole.
Therefore, the sacred also represents “the presence of the center in the periphery, of the immutable in the moving; dignity is essentially an expression of it, for in dignity too the center manifests outwardly; the heart is revealed in gestures. The sacred introduces a quality of the absolute into relativities and confers on perishable things a texture of eternity.” (Never again wonder at the profound lack of diginity of the left, for it is intrinsic and inevitable.)
Another way of saying it is that the sacred relates to the world as “the interference of the uncreate in the created, of the eternal in time, of the infinite in space, of the supraformal in forms; it is the mysterious introduction into one realm of existence of a presence which in reality contains and transcends that realm and could cause it to burst asunder in a sort of divine explosion. The sacred is the incommensurable, the transcendent, hidden within a fragile form belonging to this world; it has its own precise rules, its terrible aspects and its merciful qualities; moreover any violation of the sacred, even in art, has incalculable repercussions. Intrinsically the sacred is inviolable, and so much so that any attempted violation recoils on the head of the violator.”
Yes with regard to the latter, be careful, because I might just drop a house on you!
Which brings us back to Will’s riff on the Wizard of Oz. On the one hand, the United States, more than any other nation, is flat and dusty old Kansas. But at the same time, it is Oz, the vertical and shining Emerald City on a hill. We must never forget either fact, one of them Real, the other only merely real.
posted by Gagdad Bob at 5/29/2007 07:47:00 AM
More from 2006:
Saturday, December 16, 2006
The Unthinkable Goodness of America
May 02, 2006:
“..Interesting that all of last night’s Democrat condidates promised to find a special role in their administration for Bill Clinton, who is aptly described by Harvey Mansfield as “the envy of vulgar men.” To put it another way, he is an archetypal lower whorizontal man who has never mastered, much less transcended, himself, so he is a perfect symbol for the left — vain, greedy, calculating, unmanly, self-serving, governed by his appetites, indifferent to truth, and articulate and intelligent in ways that are simultaneously vacuous and portentous. .....
We have no leadership. They probably pimp gay pride day.
And, in this case, they'd be right. The Google "doodles" tend to be splashy and "fun", and not serious or reverent. I think the approach they took here is respectful, possibly moreso than a "doodle" would have been.
So after your post I went back to the site and looked at the blog, and there’s more military connections mentioned and an ongoing discount to active duty military.
Thanks, Google. As we mourn the soldiers who gave their all to defend our freedom, we also note the importance you place on the lives lost to protect your right to publicly illustrate it.
Because they’re liberals.
Liberals only care about guys who did in combat if there;s a GOP President in office they can blame for the deaths.
Why is the public high school next door to me in session? No respect for country.
an example of what google is bigger than
That Google doodle for MLK looks like the front sidewalk of my house in the neighborhood I used to live in up until two years ago. My kids and their black frieds play together and stand by each other and never give a thought to color...anyone with a brain would tell you that between that and America electing a black President we can be sure King’s dream has been fulfilled, but I’m sure The Justice Brothers would disagree.
That’s frikkin SICK!
Misplaced Priorities, no doubt.
Bing always has great photos. Also nice are the photo related suggested searches.
That one was taken at the entrance to the Massachusetts national cemetery at Bourne.
I sent them a thank you.
Google is anti-Christian and anti-American. Same as the ACLU.
I wish Bing would get their search engine working as well as google.
Probably to draw attention and get more people to go to their website, to check it out.
Years ago the Deer Park, Texas school district dropped Memorial Day. I had three kids in school at that time. They each had perfect attendance records for that year. I sat them down and explained why they would not be allowed to go to school that day. They said they understood.
More than 40% of the parents in that school district did the same thing. I was pleasantly surprised. The Memorial Day holiday was returned the next year and has been observed ever since.
Dogpile has a nice Memorial Day theme on their site.
I have a lot of questions about Google.
I imagine they do not respect our soldiers for the same reason they decided to help Soros, Hillary and Obama organize and fund the Egyptian “democracy protests” thereby abetting the Muslim Brotherhood’s coup in Egypt.
Google likes our money; America and Americans, not so much.
Freepers with Android phones need to call Google and complain.
Google serves different logo images to different regions, often country-specific. The specialty logos are listed by date here: http://www.google.com/logos/
The 3 most recent logos:
May 27, 2011 -- Birthday of Ibn Khaldun - (Middle Eastern Countries)
May 25, 2011 -- Africa Day - (African Countries)
May 25, 2011 -- Jordan Independence Day - (Jordan)
They are deliberately anti-American and anti-Christian. Here is their "Happy Holidays" from Christmas Day 2010:
Christmas Day 2009: