Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taxing the Wealthy(Gov Dayton-Mn)
KTTC.com ^ | May 29, 2011 | By Fanna Haile-Selassie

Posted on 05/31/2011 3:29:33 AM PDT by Son House

During this contentious legislative session, we've seen rallies and protests against cutting from state government programs that help the disabled, elderly, and low income residents. But with Governor Mark Dayton insisting to raise taxes on the top 2% of the state's money makers, Republican lawmakers say those are small business owners who create jobs. We went out to see how a potential tax increase would effect them.

"Don't worry, we won't tax jobs out of state," exclaims republican House Speaker Kurt Zellers.

It's been the campaign and legislative slogan for State republicans: "No new taxes", citing small businesses as the potential victims of tax increases. But how far is the rhetoric from the truth?

"A tax on the top 2% is really hitting small business where it hurts," says Steve Yaggy, owner of Yaggy Specialized Transportation.

Yaggy is one of the business owners that would make the governor's cutoff for higher taxes. But he says that doesn't make him rich.

"The people I know that are small business people fall into that category yet, the 1% or 2%, but only because they're running a small business, not because they're rich or they're millionaires," he says.

Many small businesses are S-Corporations, a business classification that keeps them from paying corporate income taxes, but require owners to lump their business income with their own take-away pay when filing individual taxes.

"That doesn't mean you have any money left. You could take that much money into your cash register and have that much in expenses as well," explains Yaggy.

As a business consultant, Jeff Bigler does okay for himself. He has a small business in Rochester with a few employees and does well enough that he can afford to give to a few charities as well.

"Lourdes: Building our future, Hiawatha Homes, to name a couple."

Bigler says understands how spending cuts could lead to less money for those who need it. But while a roughly $7,500 tax increase would not break the bank for him, he says it would likely lead to less donations and slower business growth.

"It limits our choice, giving more government choice as to where my dollars might be spent. And I'd like to have the choice to see where those dollars go."

As for the Governor changing his tax proposal...

"Would you be willing to go to the top 1%?"

"Anything is negotiable, but somebody needs to come with a proposal," says Governor Mark Dayton.

For now, Governor Dayton is sticking by his plan.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dayton; economy; marxdayton; mn; rich; tax; taxes; taxing; wealthy
With more conservative run states all around Minnesota, I wonder where the jobs are going? To be a Democrat supporter either you are 1. uninformed, or 2. have poor judgement, and #2 fits here.
1 posted on 05/31/2011 3:29:42 AM PDT by Son House
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Please ping the Mn list(as if they didn’t already know...)


2 posted on 05/31/2011 3:31:41 AM PDT by Son House (Finally, People Lie, Because They Feel If They Tell The Truth, They Won't Get What They Want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Perhaps BHO said he'd make up the differences for loss of income from businesses fleeing the state from his stash and the NLRB ordering businesses not to seek friendlier economic climes...

Dayton is of Dayton-Hudson. Is Kurt Zellers of the Zellers dept. store chain?

3 posted on 05/31/2011 4:15:59 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

What a lot of people don’t get is that small business owners put their own capital up for their companies. Thus, their active income also includes a return on that capital. Nonbusiness owners are taxed much less for their capital investments, which are less risky, and by having their investments taxed separately their active income may well be taxed at a lower rate as well.

The higher the tax on small business income, the greater the deterrence from starting and staying in business—and hiring and retaining employees.


4 posted on 05/31/2011 4:19:28 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Minot, ND, is looking good right now.

Why not Minot?
Twenty below keeps the riffraff out.


5 posted on 05/31/2011 4:40:21 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
Minot, ND, is looking good right now.

Under Perpich and a DFL house about 30 years ago it was South Dakota who prospered from the destruction of the Minnesota business atmosphere.

It's North Dakota's turn NOW.

6 posted on 05/31/2011 4:52:04 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Remember Theresa Heinz Kerry laughing about taxes? Her income was $5.07 million, $2.78 MM of which was untaxed. Of that she paid $628,401 in taxes, just over 12%. Source

The truly wealthy shelter their income in tax-exempt foundations. Hence, tax increases "on the rich" almost always fall hardest on the upper middle class.

7 posted on 05/31/2011 4:54:28 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

mark


8 posted on 05/31/2011 5:12:55 AM PDT by evad (Obama needs to show us his green card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Ask the Dayton:
“Do you want more revenue or do you simply want to punish the so called “rich”?

Revenue is only ever maximized at these reduced tax rates.”
“The spending side of the equation is always ignored as the factor creating the deficits.”


9 posted on 05/31/2011 5:13:17 AM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
"Anything is negotiable, but somebody needs to come with a proposal," says Governor Mark Dayton.

He's got a proposal. Marx Dayton vetoed it.

10 posted on 05/31/2011 5:15:10 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Going Galt has a lot of appeal right now.


11 posted on 05/31/2011 5:38:53 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

ND has the benefit of not having the country’s 4th largest legislature.

They also only meet every other year. (less damage they can do)


12 posted on 05/31/2011 7:51:18 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Son House

how about taxing all legislators and bureacrats more and living the not taxpayer funded jobs alone.


13 posted on 05/31/2011 8:58:26 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Here’s a novel idea. Why not cut state spending by 2% instead?


14 posted on 05/31/2011 10:53:49 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Democrat Tax Plan:

War - raise taxes
Peace - raise taxes
Economic boom - raise taxes
Economic crash - raise taxes
It’s sunny - raise taxes
It’s rainy - raise taxes


15 posted on 05/31/2011 11:05:55 AM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

They never learn, do they?


16 posted on 05/31/2011 1:55:54 PM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthWoody; Manic_Episode; mikethevike; coder2; AmericanChef; Reaganesque; ER Doc; lesser_satan; ...

WELCOME TO FREE REPUBLIC’S MINNESOTA PING LIST!

148 MEMBERS AND GROWING...!

FREEPMAIL ME IF YOU WANT ON OR OFF THIS LIST!


17 posted on 05/31/2011 3:13:29 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Same old tired democrat playbook to take from the producers and give to the leaches. They never learn.

Thanks for the ping. :)


18 posted on 05/31/2011 3:20:53 PM PDT by LUV W (RUN SARAH...R U N!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Son House
By Fanna Haile-Selassie

Someone light up a doobie in her honor, mon.

19 posted on 05/31/2011 3:26:39 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

At least with dayton we know at some point, he’ll give up.

He’s got what the republicans have to offer. if he does not like it.

SHUT IT DOWN! Clock runs out at the end of the month and expect for my mother (who works for the state) I don’t know of anyone that would notice.


20 posted on 05/31/2011 3:41:06 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

That is misleading.

From your source, “slightly more than half of it from investments in tax-exempt municipal and state bonds.”

You should understand that tax-exempt bonds yield a lower interest rate than other investments. So investors are accepting lower rates of return in exchange for the simpler tax situation. A corporate bond would pay a higher interest rate, yielding more income, then income tax would be due, and the after-tax return would be the same or slightly more than the tax-exempt bonds. In your example of Heinz-Kerry, investing in taxable bonds might have pushed total income up to $6M, and they’d have paid $1.5M in total taxes, or 25% overall tax rate. Nobody would then have called them tax cheats. Either way, they would end up with $4.5M after-tax. Basically, the Feds sacrifice the tax revenue as a benefit to the locality.

The only real beneficiary is the local government selling the tax-free bonds — because they get to pay a lower interest rate on money they borrow to overspend at the local level. I would eliminate tax-free bods for that reason, and not because it somehow allows investors to “get away” with something.


21 posted on 05/31/2011 3:59:03 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789
You should understand that tax-exempt bonds yield a lower interest rate than other investments. So investors are accepting lower rates of return in exchange for the simpler tax situation.

"Simpler"? Is that all? rotflmao.

BTW, my dad was a municipal bond financing consultant for thirty years.

The only real beneficiary is the local government selling the tax-free bonds —

And you should have seen the corruption for the benefit of developers in those. Further, you have not addressed the tax exempt foundations the wealthy use to both hide income and benefit their investments. Both are criminal and massive.

22 posted on 05/31/2011 5:11:22 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

“Further, you have not addressed the tax exempt foundations the wealthy use to both hide income and benefit their investments.”

Nope, I didn’t disagree with your second point, just the misleading statement about tax rates on the $5M as though it should have all been taxable.


23 posted on 05/31/2011 7:36:27 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

One can make lots of money that is untaxed following the tax laws in the US. Warren said that he could avoid all income taxes by never “trading” his assets, in some cases perhaps borrowing against his holdings at 0-1%, or in others trading “essentially equal” assets, a non-taxable event, when rearranging a portfolio. The wealthy need never pay income taxes. It is for the middle class dummies.


24 posted on 06/01/2011 5:09:27 PM PDT by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Son House

http://www.daytonshutdown.com/


25 posted on 06/04/2011 10:42:37 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson