Have you been reading my posts e.g. precedents and supreme court ruling. I’m not the evasivie one here. Why haven’t YOU answered my questions about Arthur?
Why do you oppose the two citizen parent idea? You make it sound personal.
“Have you been reading my posts e.g. precedents and supreme court ruling. I’m not the evasivie one here. “
///
i HAVE been reading your posts. and i DO think you are being evasive. ...more than evasive, i think you are DELIBERATELY misleading and deceptive.
instead of having an HONEST discussion, about these issues.
and i wonder why...
yes, as you say, Arthur admitted his Father was Irish born. and there was plenty of time for him to become a citizen. so everyone ASSUMED he had. just as every ASSUMED Obama’s eligibility was verified. (a case of “it’s not my table...”).
...in the Constitution, the Founders DIDN’T define “Natural born”. so you think it was an accident? instead of that they didn’t feel a need to define what “is is” ?
...i admit you know a LOT i don’t. you’d have to, to be able to dodge, dissemble, and mislead as well as you do, on all these issues. i admit i am very impressed with your knowledge and intelligence.
...instead of addressing this, you come back with an esoteric quotation from Ark, that again ignores the central issue:
To: Captain Kirk
The SCOTUS ruled that Kim Wong Ark was a native-born citizen, not natural born.
23 posted on Friday, June 03, 2011 1:10:08 PM by fastkelly
...is there ANYTHING that would get you to have some honest intellectual curiosity, about the obvious coverup and scrubbing, the fact that ALL his records are hidden, from the “most transparent President ever” ???
...i’d LOVE for you to explain to me, how a teenager in Hawaii, got a CONNECTICUT SSN...