Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Please make it stop (Sarah hit piece)
Washington Post ^ | June 3,2011 | Greg Sargent

Posted on 06/03/2011 1:58:08 PM PDT by Hojczyk

Everyone has already had a grand old time mocking this video of Sarah Palin bungling her Paul Revere history, but I actually think it amounts to quite an eloquent statement. It’s as eloquent an argument as anyone could make that this woman really should not be treated by any of us as anything resembling a presidential candidate until it’s absolutely necessary — which is to say, until she actually runs for president.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enemedia; gregsargent; journolist; journolista; leftchosis; onenation; palinbus; palinoia; palinrevere; pds; rentfree; smellthefear; waddedpantybrigade; wapo; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

1 posted on 06/03/2011 1:58:11 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Everyone has already had a grand old time mocking this video of Sarah Palin bungling her Paul Revere history,

If only they devoted a tenth as much time getting after Obama's many gaffes.

2 posted on 06/03/2011 1:59:31 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I missed the gaffee. Was it a true oops or just a matter of opinion of the so called elites.


3 posted on 06/03/2011 2:01:19 PM PDT by GoCards (RUN SARAH RUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Maybe she should jab them a little harder by publishing a list of her gaffes that the media has reported versus a list of all of obama’s gaffes up to the present. Any guesses as to which is longer?


4 posted on 06/03/2011 2:03:09 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Thank Goodness that Sarah didn't say that her bus tour was going to visit 57 states. Can you imagine the media uproar if she had said that?
5 posted on 06/03/2011 2:03:43 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

As Rush said today the media did not make Sarah so they cannot destroy Sarah..
They are terrified of her and angry over her attitude towards the media....

IF THEY HATE HER, SHE MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT...


6 posted on 06/03/2011 2:04:10 PM PDT by GSP.FAN (Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
She started garbling just a tiny bit there.

But you know, most people stumble over words a little when, especially when they're actually talking without a teleprompter.

7 posted on 06/03/2011 2:04:35 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (The brain is the weapon; everything else is just accessories. --FReeper Joe Brower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
You can smell the fear.
8 posted on 06/03/2011 2:04:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

the same Greg Sargent with the posting below about pullling an ad and the Progressive Change thingy???

Oh yeah, I’ll jump right on it.....Sarcasm intended.


9 posted on 06/03/2011 2:05:46 PM PDT by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Aman goes to England, he knows he has to make a toast, He has no friggin idea how to do it, He doesn’t bother to ask or he forgets his instructions, He screws it up and the Media gives him a pass.

Sarah cannot sneeze without them jumping al over her. The Washington Post is toilet paper.


10 posted on 06/03/2011 2:06:33 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoCards
Here's here quote as reported by USSA Today (Note the inclusion of "colloquial" speech):

He who warned, uh, the … the British that they weren't gonna be takin' away our arms, uh, by ringin' those bells and, um, by makin' sure that as he's ridin' his horse through town to send those warnin' shots and bells that, uh, we were gonna be secure and we were gonna be free … and we were gonna be armed.

OMG the horror.

11 posted on 06/03/2011 2:07:23 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I think it is more accurate to say they smell a potential candidate they can pull a Dan Quale on.


12 posted on 06/03/2011 2:07:55 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Luckily for Sarah, no one in her party needed an aspirator or inhalator after passing out. Bob


13 posted on 06/03/2011 2:09:07 PM PDT by alstewartfan (Trains. Who'll remember the ones who only rode in them to die? Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Make it stop?

Sure..

Unemployment 9.1 and it’s Summer Recovery II...

The Obama, Pelosi and Reid spending spree’s bought what???


14 posted on 06/03/2011 2:09:33 PM PDT by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Wait... the Washington Post doesn’t like Palin?


15 posted on 06/03/2011 2:09:41 PM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Much ado about nothing. The media is grasping at straws to try and bring her down. I’ve listened to her enough to forgive some silly gaff from a lady who has been out there talking the talk (and walking the walk) since the 2008 campaign. I’m positive she knows the true hhistory of the event and just got to talking to fast and her tounge got ahread of her brain. Happens to all of us (except Barry and Joe and the media elites of course - their special).


16 posted on 06/03/2011 2:10:42 PM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
The liberals chatter about what they fear the most.

The lady has them biting their fingernails and making up comforting statements targeted at making them feel better.

Only a liberal is stupid enough to make something up out of whole cloth...and then believe it.

That's why they come up with ridiculously skewed polls...they'll believe them even though they know it's contrived.

17 posted on 06/03/2011 2:11:02 PM PDT by capt. norm (Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves for they shall never run out of material. c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

He signs the guest book 2008. Imagine if Sarah or even Bush had done that. They would still be laughing.


18 posted on 06/03/2011 2:11:46 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“One such translator was an American of Haitian descent, representative of the extraordinary work that our men and women in uniform do all around the world — Navy Corpse-Man Christian Brossard.” –mispronouncing “Corpsman” (the “ps” is silent) during a speech at the National Prayer Breakfast, Washington, D.C., Feb. 5, 2010 (The Corpsman’s name is also Christopher, not Christian)

“The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.” —Tampa, Fla., Jan. 28, 2010

“The reforms we seek would bring greater competition, choice, savings and inefficiencies to our health care system.” —in remarks after a health care roundtable with physicians, nurses and health care providers, Washington, D.C., July 20, 2009

“It was also interesting to see that political interaction in Europe is not that different from the United States Senate. There’s a lot of — I don’t know what the term is in Austrian, wheeling and dealing.” —confusing German for “Austrian,” a language which does not exist, Strasbourg, France, April 6, 2009

“No, no. I have been practicing...I bowled a 129. It’s like — it was like Special Olympics, or something.” —making an off-hand joke during an appearance on “The Tonight Show”, March 19, 2009

“What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith...” —in an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, who jumped in to correct Obama by saying “your Christian faith,” which Obama quickly clarified

“I’m here with the Girardo family here in St. Louis.” —speaking via satellite to the Democratic National Convention, while in Kansas City, Missouri, Aug. 25, 2008

“Let me introduce to you the next President — the next Vice President of the United States of America, Joe Biden.” —slipping up while introducing Joe Biden at their first joint campaign rally, Springfield, Illinois, Aug. 23, 2008

“Just this past week, we passed out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee — which is my committee — a bill to call for divestment from Iran as way of ratcheting up the pressure to ensure that they don’t obtain a nuclear weapon.” —referring to a committee he is not on, Sderot, Israel, July 23, 2008

“Let me be absolutely clear. Israel is a strong friend of Israel’s. It will be a strong friend of Israel’s under a McCain...administration. It will be a strong friend of Israel’s under an Obama administration. So that policy is not going to change.” —Amman, Jordan, July 22, 2008

“How’s it going, Sunshine?” —campaigning in Sunrise, Florida

“On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes — and I see many of them in the audience here today — our sense of patriotism is particularly strong.”

“Hold on one second, sweetie, we’re going to do — we’ll do a press avail.” —to a female reporter for ABC’s Detroit affiliate who asked about his plan to help American autoworkers

“I’ve now been in 57 states — I think one left to go.” —at a campaign event in Beaverton, Oregon

“Why can’t I just eat my waffle?” —after being asked a foreign policy question by a reporter while visiting a diner in Pennsylvania

“Throughout our history, America’s confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor, to the threat of nuclear annihilation. Americans have adapted to the threats posed by an ever-changing world.”

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama-isms.htm


19 posted on 06/03/2011 2:12:04 PM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
You can smell the fear.

This. Everyone knows that Obama couldn't pick Paul Revere out of a lineup if his life depended on it and likewise Obama couldn't identify why there have been aircraft carriers named "Lexington" if he was otherwise going to be deported back to Indonesia or Kenya. The double standard is staggering.
20 posted on 06/03/2011 2:12:19 PM PDT by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

I hope you all do know that Quayle was given the card with the misspelling - by the school principal.

That said, I worked in an industry that had many high-fliers, and none of them (all guys) could spell worth a darn. But on the other hand, they could answer any question you asked them, knew enough to find out about things they may not have known, and could speak without a teleprompter.

Personally, I think Palin doesn’t want to be president and is thinking about who she wants to support. But that has the press scared out of their collective wits too.


21 posted on 06/03/2011 2:12:31 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

This kind of sophomoric crap isn’t going to phase her – it only serves to make the author look petty and small. (Put another way, it makes him look like a Wiener)


22 posted on 06/03/2011 2:13:37 PM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
I think it is more accurate to say they smell a potential candidate they can pull a Dan Quale on.

If that were true, they'd be begging us to nominate her.

I don't see that happening, do you?

Please show me, if you can.

If you can't, then you're either a liar or an idiot.

23 posted on 06/03/2011 2:13:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

Remember when Sarah tweeted some of the embarrassing Obama gaffes several months ago? It was comical. These few seconds of fractured speech would have been hailed if said by Obama, without a prompter. It would have been BHO at his finest.


24 posted on 06/03/2011 2:14:30 PM PDT by alstewartfan (Trains. Who'll remember the ones who only rode in them to die? Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Everyone has already had a grand old time mocking this video of Sarah Palin bungling her Paul Revere history,

Bet no Democrat in Congress and no one from the MSM can tell us about our Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights or any of our founding documents. Bunch of elitist frauds and narrow minded socialist twits.


25 posted on 06/03/2011 2:14:38 PM PDT by Bitsy (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan
Saran is not scripted, and sometimes makes mistakes. Obama is highly scripted, and still makes mistakes.

I know which one I'm going with.

26 posted on 06/03/2011 2:16:48 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

In my world the sun doesn’t rise and set on Sarah Palin. People, she is human and not worthy of the god-like respect she gets on this website. I think West, Cain and Backmann are just as much if not more worthy of our adoration. Only God is perfect. This woman is human and makes mistakes just like we all do. Stop the worship, PLEASE!


27 posted on 06/03/2011 2:18:31 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Congress doesn't care a damn about "we the people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

OK, that’s the basic friggin’ IDEA, IIRC, without much handwringing bullsh!t about whether during his ride, he frightened some deer and upset the delicate balance of nature, or got dust in the eyes of some Native American, or other such nonsense;)


28 posted on 06/03/2011 2:19:02 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: livius

I’ll bet you a Weiner on that one! There is no way that Sarah Palin will choose to be nothing more than a cheerleader for others, at a time when we need HER as President. Bob


29 posted on 06/03/2011 2:19:06 PM PDT by alstewartfan (Trains. Who'll remember the ones who only rode in them to die? Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Thank Goodness that Sarah didn't say that her bus tour was going to visit 57 states.

She should ask some of the reporters if they have the map of the 57 states obozo visited in 2008.

30 posted on 06/03/2011 2:19:10 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (zero hates Texas and we hate him back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Greg Sargent - member of Journolist

Democrats have been using the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent as their go to guy

http://tinyurl.com/3uky6xz

Sargent worries some people might come to believe that Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann are biased

******

January 16, 2011 at 5:57 am

Greg Sargent at the Post has an interesting theory on the real meaning of Obama’s memorial speech (Re: Arizona shooting):

It’s true that Obama stated clearly there that rhetoric didn’t cause the shooting. But these lines are best understood as a set up to the larger point that followed, which is that the shooting confers a moral obligation upon all of us to improve the tone and integrity of our discourse. If Obama had delivered this latter message in isolation, without the set up, conservatives would have rejected it as political, as criticism directed at them…

Even if Obama didn’t say so, his larger mesesage that we all tone it down was mainly — though not exclusively — directed at the right. In a context where prominent conservatives have called accused Obama of not loving America and have called him a socialist, a Marxist, a secret Muslim sympathizer, and a coddler of our enemies, Obama’s insistence that we improve the discourse for the sake of our children and our country was unmistakably aimed mostly at them.

http://tinyurl.com/3p68npk


31 posted on 06/03/2011 2:19:30 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

yeah, because they’ve been giving her a free pass up until now.


32 posted on 06/03/2011 2:19:47 PM PDT by Jeff Vader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

STAND UP CHUCK!!


33 posted on 06/03/2011 2:20:28 PM PDT by Eagle of Liberty ("You're a different kind of special..........")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy

Except she didn’t completely bungle it.

The delivery left much to be desired. The content, not so much. Chances are she had a whole bunch of data crammed into her head during a tour there, and was trying to rattle it all off.

Oh, for shame, poor delivery. At least she didn’t say all that during the National Anthem.


34 posted on 06/03/2011 2:21:21 PM PDT by HushTX (I make libs rage quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“One of the finest moments of his presidency. Obama didn’t just stand up for the legal right of the group to build the Islamic center. He voiced powerful support for their moral right to do so as well, casting it as central to American identity....Obama directly confronted the demagoguery at the core of much of the opposition to this project....Ultimately, though, Obama’s speech transcends the politics of the moment, and will go down as a defining and perhaps even a breakthrough performance.”
— Washington Post “Plum Line” blogger Greg Sargent in an August 14 posting.

35 posted on 06/03/2011 2:21:29 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Daily Mail has a similar hit piece up at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1394039/Patriot-Sarah-Palin-wrongly-explains-Paul-Reveres-midnight-ride-Boston.html

Several comments are posted defending her and at first those comments had by far the most votes which tells me she has much more support than we are being led to believe. Problem is anybody can vote the comments up or down on dailymail without a logon and paid dem operatives will clear their browser cache to be able to vote the defending comments down over and over again.

36 posted on 06/03/2011 2:21:59 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

That’s right! That’s why we don’t expect her to be perfect, only committed, tenacious, courageous and correct on the issues. Sarah has two decades of successful executive experience, and that’s why for me she is head and shoulders above the crowd, even above these excellent people you mention. Bob


37 posted on 06/03/2011 2:23:48 PM PDT by alstewartfan (Trains. Who'll remember the ones who only rode in them to die? Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist
Stop the worship, PLEASE!

okay

thanks

38 posted on 06/03/2011 2:24:43 PM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
This is another one of those Kill Sarah Palin articles, that is meant to steer some nut towards killing Sarah Palin.

Not a single word is published about Palin by the MSM that they haven't thought long and hard on for maximum impact.

When they make a headline such as “Please make it stop”

they are hoping to make Palin the focus of desperate crazy people and maybe one will “Please make it stop” by killing her.

Otherwise, why the emotional appeal “Please”?

Why the definite end “make it stop”?

Why “it”?

“It” can be anything, like voices in a crazy persons head.

How about this for the headline:

“There should be no campaign coverage of Sarah Palin”

Ever since that Arizona woman got shot in the head the MSM has been playing this game against Palin. The MSM was not upset that a politician was shot. They were upset it wasn't palin but they are trying hard on fixing that.

39 posted on 06/03/2011 2:24:43 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Everyone has already had a grand old time mocking this video of Sarah Palin bungling her Paul Revere history

So what. Libtards don't have a clue when it comes to knowing anything about the principles of Americanism of the Founding Fathers.

40 posted on 06/03/2011 2:27:15 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

I don’t agree. I don’t think she’d see herself as a “cheerleader” for others. She could make or break somebody, frankly.

But I think she wants to stir up people’s courage and enthusiasm with this tour, but not necessarily to run herself. Unless we get courage and enthusiasm and hope back, we’re not going to win in 2012.

And I think she wants us to win, but if she doesn’t want to be the candidate, she wants to have a lot of say in picking him or her. Which she should have. But the only way to get around the GOP establishment, which has already nominated the unelectable Romney, is to build her base and work outside of the “system.”


41 posted on 06/03/2011 2:27:15 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Good summary of the Obamanation.


42 posted on 06/03/2011 2:27:31 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

WaPo Hires Lefty Blogger Greg Sargent, Foe of Conservative ‘Wingnut Mendacity’

Greg Sargent, who worked for the Bush-bashing blog Talking Points Memo and for a time wrote a poor-man’s-Media-Matters blog called “The Horse’s Mouth” attacking the idea of liberal media bias

Sargent signed off to his hard-core liberal readership this way:

I’m heading over to The Washington Post, where I’ll be writing the lead blog on a new site that WaPo is launching. This will drive you mad with curiosity, unfortunately, but the details on the new site and blog will only be forthcoming when it launches the week after next.

In response to saddened TPM readers, asking him if he’d back to the partisan blogging for 2012, he said “all I can say is I really hope to be part of TPM again...”

http://tinyurl.com/3rsjqfo

******

Washington Post’s Greg Sargent Demands Unions Get Violent

The Washington Post’s leftwing mouthpiece, Greg Sargent, who they ostensibly pay to be an objective reporter is on twitter demanding that unions in Wisconsin get violent to get their way.

on Twitter that Sargent was calling for unions to get violent in Wisconsin, Sargent declared he was not promoting violence despite actually writing on twitter:

Dear union thugs: Will you please get violent in Wisconsin already? Pretty please?

http://tinyurl.com/3ddgtlf


43 posted on 06/03/2011 2:27:51 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Gay Alert! Gay Alert! Gay Alert!!!


44 posted on 06/03/2011 2:28:38 PM PDT by Palladin (Sarah Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“...we were gonna be secure and we were gonna be free … and we were gonna be armed.”

Sounds good to me. Paul Revere would likely approve.


45 posted on 06/03/2011 2:29:33 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Sarah has them literally running in circles! This is a great maneuver. It’s fun to watch the press fall all over themselves. LOL!


46 posted on 06/03/2011 2:29:48 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Isn’t it called gaydar?


47 posted on 06/03/2011 2:30:39 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

JournoListas like Greg Sargent formally of Soros-funded Talking Points Memo never gain national attention except in scathing critiques on blogs by people lamenting the loss of journalistic integrity from people who live off the unearned credit of the term “journalist.”

Greg Sargent of the Washington Post’s The Plum Line Blog recently posted a piece scolding BigJournalism.com for not properly observing journalistic ethics. Yet in the process Sargent made a number of assumptions based on his own biased beliefs and ultimately ended up not only muddying the waters but seeming to commit the same errors he claimed Big Journalism was perpetrating.

http://tinyurl.com/4ycom69


48 posted on 06/03/2011 2:31:10 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Most of those mediots have no idea who Paul Revere is let alone the average HS student.

Pray for America


49 posted on 06/03/2011 2:31:39 PM PDT by bray (Hey Country Club, hold Sarah's coat while she kicks his ____.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“Thank Goodness that Sarah didn’t say that her bus tour was going to visit 57 states.”

Maybe she should say it!

“Just as Ubama said, we’re going to visit all 57 States!” Then burst out laughing!


50 posted on 06/03/2011 2:31:59 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson