Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party to Back Any GOP Nominee Including Romney
Fox News ^ | 6-5-2011 | Lexi Stemple

Posted on 06/05/2011 3:07:31 PM PDT by bimboeruption

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last
As the founder of the Mansfield North Central Ohio Tea Party Association, http://www.bloodofpatriots.org I can tell you with certitude...we will not support Romney or any other RINO. Kremer doesn't speak for us.
1 posted on 06/05/2011 3:07:36 PM PDT by bimboeruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Kremer IS NOT THE TEA PARTY NOR DOES SHE LEAD IT.


2 posted on 06/05/2011 3:09:28 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44

Who is th person?


3 posted on 06/05/2011 3:10:29 PM PDT by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Already posted here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2730045/posts

Amy Kremer does NOT speak for me!

Rebellion is brewing!!


4 posted on 06/05/2011 3:10:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I make my fight in the primary.

Obama thanks you.


5 posted on 06/05/2011 3:11:54 PM PDT by PeteB570 (Islam is the sea in which the terrorist shark swims. It aids & comforts the shark on it's journey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
The Tea Party will support whoever wins the GOP presidential nomination - - even if that person is former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. That's the affirmative word from Tea Party Express chair Amy Kremer.

Never heard of her.

She can kiss my ass.

6 posted on 06/05/2011 3:13:59 PM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

If Amy thinks she is speaking for me (or millions like me) her head is irretrievably lost up her backside.


7 posted on 06/05/2011 3:15:32 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (An election is not a (national) suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Um, no one speaks for the Tea Party.


8 posted on 06/05/2011 3:15:42 PM PDT by Reagan69 (If it ain't broke, the government will fix it till it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

i’m not voting for romney.


9 posted on 06/05/2011 3:16:58 PM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Sorry, Jim, I searched on the title and nothing came up.


10 posted on 06/05/2011 3:17:04 PM PDT by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44

The beauty of the Tea Party is there is no one leader. If any network was going to get it right it would be Fox so clearly we can see how this story will play out.


11 posted on 06/05/2011 3:17:34 PM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
I make my fight in the primary. Obama thanks you.

Absolutely right. I have held my nose and voted more than once, most recently in 2008. To do otherwise is immature and self destructive.

12 posted on 06/05/2011 3:17:43 PM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I am way to radical to belong to any “group”, the “Tea Party” or otherwise.

I will vote for the most constitutionally conservative option available to me in my state primary.

Then, I will vote for whoever has an “R” beside their name in Nov. 2012.

That’s just how I roll.


13 posted on 06/05/2011 3:18:02 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a (small) monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

For my part I’ll fight in the primary, and like ‘08 I’ll hold my nose and vote for Mittens, but I know a few conservatives who’ll just stay home on election day if the media picks our candidate again.


14 posted on 06/05/2011 3:20:04 PM PDT by RedStateGuyTrappedinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I will NOT vote for Romney.


15 posted on 06/05/2011 3:20:12 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Nor for me! Who the heck is this chick?


16 posted on 06/05/2011 3:20:39 PM PDT by rintense (The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse
I have held my nose and voted more than once, most recently in 2008.

Is that how the dems do it? :)

17 posted on 06/05/2011 3:21:01 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (If you can read this post, the world did not end on May 21st.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Intuitatively, you know that the people who were in the tea party and many of the independents know that Romney will not be the candidate. If he is, those same people will well up and create something bigger than the Ross Perot insurrection, thereby insuring a big win for the Democrats. A man who favored abortion and a state-scale health insurance bill has no chance of winning for the Conservatitives.

Republican National Committee wake up! Back a candidate with none of the baggage he has. If he was viable, he’d have won before. Wake up and smell the roses. Why are the media and the democratic party pushing him so hard? The answer ought to be obvious to you. He can’t win!


18 posted on 06/05/2011 3:23:49 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Okay, let us suppose McCain won the election, but with the same congress that was elected in 2008. I think the same legislation would have passed, but with no opposition from the Republicans.

Having a RINO in office is much worse than no Republican at all. I WILL NOT vote for Romney under any circumstances.


19 posted on 06/05/2011 3:24:26 PM PDT by wolfpat (Not to know what has been transacted in former times is to be always a child. -- Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Amy Kremer needs her FAT ASS COLDCOCKED!


20 posted on 06/05/2011 3:24:29 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Voting for the least bad candidate?

Isn’t this is where we came in?

That is exactly how we ended up with wave after wave of RINOs weasleing their way into high level office.


21 posted on 06/05/2011 3:24:48 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. -- John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

This woman has a lot of nerve presuming to speak fo rthe entire TEA party. Sarah Palin, who probably could speak for the TEA party or a huge chunk of it, is always careful not to do this. She always refers to an Army of Patriotic Davids rather than a leader on a White Horse.

This lady, by piping up and arrogating to herself such authority, exposes herself as antithetical to what the TEA party stands for. It is a “bottom/up” movement not “top/ down” and certainly not “top down”, if the “top” is this Amy what’s her name!@#%.


22 posted on 06/05/2011 3:25:44 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“...Amy Kremer does NOT speak for me!...”
-
NOBODY SPEAKS FOR ME!


23 posted on 06/05/2011 3:26:18 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a (small) monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I’m not voting for Mitt or any other RINO.


24 posted on 06/05/2011 3:27:22 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

NO!


25 posted on 06/05/2011 3:28:12 PM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Amy Kremer is full of ...(RHYMES WITH MITT).


26 posted on 06/05/2011 3:28:31 PM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Nominating Romney would assure an Obama win in 2012.

Republicans need to pick a conservative to challenge Obama.

No more liberals, no more moderates, no more rinos!

27 posted on 06/05/2011 3:28:46 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Who the heck is this chick?

*********

Tea Party Express - Amy Kremer


28 posted on 06/05/2011 3:32:00 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

That liberal will never get my vote.


29 posted on 06/05/2011 3:32:15 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I’m going to fight like hell to avoid having a horribly disappointing experience like voting for Romney. I would hate that as much or more than I hated voting for McCain. Part of the reason I would hate such a thing is that we do have the Tea Party now, and we should never again have to vote for a Romney type candidate.


30 posted on 06/05/2011 3:32:27 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Give the morbidly obese presumptuous beeyeetch the keys to a donut factory... we would never have to hear her self serving crappola ever again...


31 posted on 06/05/2011 3:32:49 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rintense

“Nor for me! Who the heck is this chick?”

Kremer was one of the founders of that other scam group, the Tea Party Patriots.

Read about the breakup here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/28/tea-party-infighting


32 posted on 06/05/2011 3:33:37 PM PDT by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
"whoever the Republican nominee is will have to have the support of the Tea Party movement, the entire Tea Party movement."

Spoken like someone who thinks they are the entire TP movement.

Piss off, lady. I have no idea who you are, nor do I care. I don't vote for warmers.

33 posted on 06/05/2011 3:33:44 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Tea Party to Back Any GOP Nominee, including Romney says Tea Party Express chair Amy Kremer. >

Ya gotta love these big party groupies and insiders....

Party before country.

Compromise over conservatism....here is comes again.

Party over principle.

Gezzz...Where have I heard all this before??

34 posted on 06/05/2011 3:35:57 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

"A political party cannot be all things to all people.
It must represent certain fundamental beliefs
 which must not be compromised to political expediency
or simply to swell its numbers."

--  President Ronald Reagan


"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
 over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
 to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldn’t make any sense at all.""

--  President Ronald Reagan


35 posted on 06/05/2011 3:37:55 PM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I will not hold my nose and vote for anyone again.

I can go with most any Conservative. I have no one blocked out except phony Conservatives who mandate insurance, is not anti-abortion, and believes in Global warming.

That’s you Mittens.

Amy needs to keep her mouth shut, she does not speak for the Tea Party.


36 posted on 06/05/2011 3:38:12 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
The Tea Party will support whoever wins the GOP presidential nomination - - even if that person is former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. That's the affirmative word from Tea Party Express chair Amy Kremer.

The "Tea Party Express" and it's chair really need to stop pretending that they are the Tea Party. This woman has no business making statements about what Tea Party members will do.
37 posted on 06/05/2011 3:39:44 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

By voting that way you make yourself irrelevant to the election. There are roughly equal numbers on each side who vote for the party no mater who they nominate. Neither party has to pay any attention to these groups.

The voters they have to woo are the ones who will stay home or vote third party if their party nominates an unacceptable person. Saying you will vote for the nominee even if he is a RINO tells the party “you can crap all over me but I’ll take it and reward you for it.”


38 posted on 06/05/2011 3:40:47 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all.-- President Ronald Reagan

Unfortunately, we've been seeing the results of this for years now

39 posted on 06/05/2011 3:42:10 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Whoever this POS is, she definitely doesn’t know what the hell she is talking about.

The Tea Party Has no leader or spokesman who represents us.

We Tea Party Patriots will vote for who ever we want based on individual preference, NOT on any recommendation from some nobody.

Tea Party is Freedom!


40 posted on 06/05/2011 3:42:45 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (Wise To The Lies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

“The “Tea Party Express” and it’s chair really need to stop pretending that they are the Tea Party. This woman has no business making statements about what Tea Party members will do.”

I know.

FOX needs to do some real research on the Tea Party Movement. We have no national leader. Just because Kremer and her buds set up the first national tea party site, doesn’t mean they are leaders.


41 posted on 06/05/2011 3:46:54 PM PDT by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: deport

Part of the patriot radio network, whatever in hell that is. Is that the desert bunch out of searchlight Nevada, you know the black helicopter crowd????


42 posted on 06/05/2011 3:50:07 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

I agree with you.


43 posted on 06/05/2011 3:52:28 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Sarah Palin - She’s living rent-free inside the MSM’s heads. Credited to Lurk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
"Part of the patriot radio network, whatever in hell that is. Is that the desert bunch out of searchlight Nevada, you know the black helicopter crowd????"

Patriot network on XM/Sirius satellite radio

44 posted on 06/05/2011 3:53:28 PM PDT by liberateUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

I make my fight in the primary.

So what you say - If eight Republicans enter the Primary and only one wins then the supporters of the other seven should stay home come election day. Is that what you’re saying?

How’s that Wise Latina working out for you?


45 posted on 06/05/2011 3:53:28 PM PDT by PeteB570 (Islam is the sea in which the terrorist shark swims. It aids & comforts the shark on it's journey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

“Whoever this POS is, she definitely doesn’t know what the hell she is talking about.

The Tea Party Has no leader or spokesman who represents us.

We Tea Party Patriots will vote for who ever we want based on individual preference, NOT on any recommendation from some nobody.

Tea Party is Freedom!”

That’s right. The beauty of the Tea Party Movement is we are local and autonomous...just like sleeper cells.


46 posted on 06/05/2011 3:54:02 PM PDT by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
Count me out then if it's Romney!

Waffles for breakfast, supper/lunch, dinner 7-days-a-week, anyone?

YEAR Obvious Pro-Abortion Romney Romney Feigning 'Pro-Life'
Romney, goin' back to 1970 when Romney's Mom ran for Senate "I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time when my Mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. (October, 1994 Senatorial debate vs. Ted Kennedy) "'He's been a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly,'" Romney adviser Michael Murphy told the conservative National Review..., says the Concord Monitor = So I guess that made him a below-the-radar "flip" acting like a "flop?"
1994 (Campaign) "I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time when my Mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years that we should sustain and support it, and I sustain and support that law and the right of a woman to make that choice." (October, 1994 Senatorial debate vs. Ted Kennedy) = Mitt the flipster from what most LDS represent their faith as being...BTW, Romney uses the strongest word possible for support – “sustain” ...Note for non-Mormons: Lds use the word “sustain” for support for their own “prophet” Romney has since invoked a "nuanced stance" about what he was in 1994: He says "Look, I was pro-choice. I am pro-life. You can go back to YouTube and look at what I said in 1994. I never said I was pro-choice, but my position was effectively pro-choice. (Source: Source: 2007 GOP Iowa Straw Poll debate Aug 5, 2007)
1994 (Planned Parenthood ties) → 2001 (a) Romney's wife gives donation to Planned Parenthood... (b) On June 12, 1994, Romney himself attends private Planned Parenthood event at home of a sister-in-law of a Planned Parenthood board member where the president of Planned Parenthood recalls talking to Romney: "Nicki Nichols Gamble, a former president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, said today that the photo shows Mitt and Ann Romney at a private home in Cohasset in June 1994." Source: See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941932/posts; "Gamble said the pic was snapped at an event at GOP activist Eleanor Bleakie’s house and that she “clearly” remembered speaking with Romney at the event." Source: See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941627/posts; "In fact Romney personally attended the Planned Parenthood event in question on June 12, 1994. Gamble, the President of Massachusuetts Planned Parenthood in 1994, also attended the event at the home of a Republican, Eleanor Bleakie, the sister-in-law of a Planned Parenthood Board member. Both Romney and Michael Kennedy, who appeared on behalf of nephew of Ted Kennedy, attended the event." Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941240/posts 2001: "I do not wish to be labeled pro-choice." (Mitt Romney, Letter to the Editor, The Salt Lake Tribune, 7/12/01) = So he doesn't want to be known as a "flop" (so what is he?)
2002-2004 “I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose, and have devoted and am dedicated to honoring my word in that regard…(Nov. 2, 2002) = Well, now guess what? He's solidly pro-abortion AGAIN! See also: "I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose. This choice is a deeply personal one … Women should be free to choose based on their own beliefs, not mine and not the government's." (Stephanie Ebbert, "Clarity Sought On Romney's Abortion Stance," The Boston Globe, 7/3/05) = Ah, back securely in the "flop" saddle again? Nov. '04: Romney & his wife had simultaneous pro-life "conversions" linked to stem cell research: Romney met w/Dr. Douglas Melton from Harvard Stem Cell Institute: He recalls that it happened in a single revelatory moment, during a Nov. 9, 2004, meeting with an embryonic-stem-cell researcher who said he didn't believe therapeutic cloning presented a moral issue because the embryos were destroyed at 14 days. "It hit me very hard that we had so cheapened the value of human life in a Roe v. Wade environment that it was important to stand for the dignity of human life," Romney says. Source: Time Mag, March 9, 2007 = (So the pro-abortion-but-no-pro-choice-label-please-is-now-a-pro-life-convert?)
2005 May 27 2005: Romney affirms his commitment to being "pro-choice" at a press conference. ("I am absolutely committed to my promise to maintain the status quo with regards to laws relating to abortion and choice.") = OK, this is at least a flop from November '04! What about his gubernatorial record '03-'06? Mitt later says his actions were ALL pro-life. I assume somewhere in '05 some 'pro-life' decisions. "As governor, I’ve had several pieces of legislation reach my desk, which would have expanded abortion rights in Massachusetts. Each of those I vetoed. Every action I’ve taken as the governor that relates to the sanctity of human life, I have stood on the side of life." = So, THESE ACTIONS were not only an '02 commitment reversal, but his May 27, '05 press conference commitment as well. So "flipping" is beginning to be routine
2006 April 12, 2006--Mitt signs his "Commonwealth Care" into existence, thereby expanding abortion access/taxpayer funded abortions for women--including almost 2% of the females of his state who earn $75,000 or more. (Wait a minute, I thought he told us post-'06 that ALL of his actions were "pro-life?"). Also, not only this, but as governor, Romney could exercise veto power to portions of Commonwealth Care. Did Romney exercise this power? (Yes, he vetoed Sections 5, 27, 29, 47, 112, 113, 134 & 137). What prominent section dealing with Planned Parenthood as part of the "payment policy advisory board" did Romney choose NOT to veto? (Section 3) That section mandates that one member of MassHealth Payment Policy Board must be appointed by Planned Parenthood League of MA. (See chapter 58 of the Acts of 2006, section 3 for details). "As governor, I’ve had several pieces of legislation reach my desk, which would have expanded abortion rights in Massachusetts. Each of those I vetoed. Every action I’ve taken as the governor that relates to the sanctity of human life, I have stood on the side of life." = So, then THESE ACTIONS were not only a reversal of his 2002 commitment, but his May 27, 2005 press conference commitment. So "flipping" is still routine
Early 2007 On January 29, 2007 during South Carolina visit, Romney stated: “Over the last multiple years, as you know, I have been effectively pro-choice." (Bruce Smith, "Romney Campaigns in SC with Sen. DeMint," The Associated Press, 1/29/07) = OK how could "every action I've taken as the governor that relates to the sanctity of human life..." AND this statement BOTH be true? Another South Carolina campaign stop has Romney uttering "I was always for life”: "I am firmly pro-life… I was always for life." (Jim Davenport, "Romney Affirms Opposition to Abortion," The Associated Press, 2/9/2007) = Oh, of course as the above shows, he's always been pro-life!
Summer 2007 "I never said I was pro-choice, but my position was effectively pro-choice." Source: 2007 GOP Iowa Straw Poll debate 8/5/2007 = OK...looking at '94 & '02 campaigns, both his public statements, his 2002 voter guide responses, & his actions (which are a major form of expression, ya know!) how could he say he "never said" he was "pro-choice?" Then comes his 8/12/07 interview with Chris Wallace of Fox: "I never called myself pro-choice. I never allowed myself to use the word pro-choice because I didn't FEEL I was pro-choice. I would protect the law, I said, as it was, but I wasn't pro-choice, and so..." = Whatever he was from '70 when his mom ran as pro-abortion senator & he sided w/ her, to 5/27/05, w/whatever interruption he had due to a pro-life altar call in Nov of '04, whatever that was...well, he assures us it wasn't a pro-abortion 'inlook' or outlook 'cause he didn't feel "pro-choice..." = So does that make him a life-long pro-lifer?
December 2007 (Anything 'different' from embryos' perspective than June 2002?) 5.5 years before – June 13, 2002: Romney: ...spoke at a bioethics forum at Brandeis University. In a Boston Globe story filed the next day, he was quoted as saying that he endorsed embryonic stem cell research, hoping it would one day cure his wife's multiple sclerosis. And he went on to say: "I am in favor of stem cell research. I will work and fight for stem cell research," before adding, "I'd be happy to talk to [President Bush] about this, though I don't know if I could budge him an inch." When pressed, however, Romney and his aides declined to offer an opinion on "therapeutic" or embryonic cloning. Source: Weekly Standard December 5, 2007: Romney: ...surplus embryos...Those embryos, I hope, could be available for adoption for people who would like to adopt embryos. But if a parent decides they would want to donate one of those embryos for purposes of research, in my view, that's acceptable. It should not be made against the law." Any "inquiring minds" want to try wrapping their minds around how a politician in one sentence mentions "adopting" embryos out (yes, a great thing to mention!) -- but then in the very NEXT breath says if a "PARENT" wants to be "pro-choice" (Mitt used the word "decides" which is what "pro-choicers" say they want) "to donate one of those embryos for purposes of research, in my view, that's acceptable." Say what???? How about 8-month gestationally-aged infants in the womb, Mitt? Or already-born infants, too, Mitt? If a "parent decides they would want to donate one of those...for purposes of research, in my view, that's acceptable..." No??? What's the 'pro-life' difference, Mitt? Here you call an embryo's mom&dad "parents" -- but "parents" w/ "research" give-away rights? How bizarre we have such schizophrenic "candidate!"

47 posted on 06/05/2011 3:57:39 PM PDT by Colofornian (I already have a God as my leader. Why do I need ANOTHER one as POTUS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Not to worry. Romney will not be the nominee.


48 posted on 06/05/2011 4:00:15 PM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

I will NOT vote for anymore GD Rinos! Period!

The Tea Party is united in one cause only...

Taxed

Enough

Already

That point needs to be driven home to all politicians who must have Tea Party votes.


49 posted on 06/05/2011 4:00:23 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (Wise To The Lies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Yes.


50 posted on 06/05/2011 4:00:59 PM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson