Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Orders Review of Hazelton, PA Immigration Laws (Tosses Appeals ruling!)
FoxNews.com ^ | 06-06-2011 | StandWithArizona.com

Posted on 06/06/2011 9:51:15 AM PDT by montag813

BIG news for supporters of the rule of law on immigration. 2 weeks after ruling in favor of AZ's law targeting employers who hire illegals- the U.S. Supreme Court voided a lower court ruling blocking Hazelton's law that does the same and also targets landlords who rent to illegals. The Court ordered the 3rd Court of Appeals to reconsider the case in light of the pro-AZ ruling, and may signal a major legal shift in our direction.


Join Stand With Arizona

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: aliens; court; courts; hazelton; illegalaliens; illegals; immigration; law; lawsuit; ruling; scotus; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 06/06/2011 9:51:19 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: montag813

Kennedy got up on the right side of the bed?


2 posted on 06/06/2011 9:55:42 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
It's pretty easy to look up US Restrictions on Foreign Ownership of Land ~ lots of stuff there ~ and there really are restrictions, and there are Supreme Court decisions supporting those restrictions.

I'd suppose if you can restrict ownership you can certainly restrict rental!

The Supreme Court may not care to overturn two centuries of land ownership law just to let a couple of Mexicans who aren't here legally to rent a room in Pennsylvania.

3 posted on 06/06/2011 9:57:17 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Nice.


4 posted on 06/06/2011 10:00:28 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

marker


5 posted on 06/06/2011 10:09:12 AM PDT by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

This decision to take this case must be looked at carefully because there is potential for the left to demagogue this issue and in so doing try to discredit the conservative members of the court.


6 posted on 06/06/2011 10:14:28 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Bump.


7 posted on 06/06/2011 10:15:15 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
try to discredit the conservative members of the court.

Somehow I don't think that Thomas or Scalia will lose much sleep over it.

8 posted on 06/06/2011 10:16:09 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eva
here is potential for the left to demagogue this issue and in so doing try to discredit the conservative members of the court

So what! If the justices decided cases on whether or not someone was going to demagogue an issue, they'd never decide anything. Better that they just do the right thing as they see it, and let the chips fall where they may.

9 posted on 06/06/2011 10:17:35 AM PDT by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Alabama may soon be in the hopper to test the reach of these decisions.

Legislature just passed a similar law to the Arizona ID check law, but also added the ‘police can check immigration status’ parts from the other law.

Also requires schools to check for valid US brith certificate, and state offices to verify immigration status.


10 posted on 06/06/2011 10:22:06 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to preserve it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
landlords who rent to illegals

Yeah. Let's target everyone except the politicians who pander to illegals, the cops who daily drive by their shape-ups, all those INS Federales whose salaries we pay, and the illegals themselves. Let's criminalize everyone else.

ML/NJ

11 posted on 06/06/2011 10:22:25 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Alright!


12 posted on 06/06/2011 10:23:53 AM PDT by MichaelP (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools ~HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

The Hazleton law was made under Barletta’s watch. This development may provide an opening for Barletta to up his name recognition for a run against Casey.


13 posted on 06/06/2011 10:25:20 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

ping


14 posted on 06/06/2011 10:28:52 AM PDT by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: commish

Alabama Immigration Law requirements:

•The bill requires all businesses, public and private, to begin using E-Verify effective April 1, 2012. Businesses that do not comply face suspension of its business license and loss of employee expensing for state income tax purposes. All state and local businesses must be in compliance by Jan. 1, 2012 or face loss of business license and contract;

•Creates an affirmative defense against business penalties if E-Verify is used. Prohibits lawsuits against businesses that fire an employee due to an E-Verify final non-confirmation determination;

•Require state and local governments to use the SAVE system to verify public-benefits eligibility for those attesting to be non-citizens;

•Creates a misdemeanor for failure to carry an alien registration document;

•Requires police, after a lawful stop and when practicable, to check a person’s immigration status if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person is illegally present. Provides 4th amendment protections and stays the status-check requirement for persons who are crime victims or witnesses;

•Creates misdemeanors for seeking day-laborer work when illegal present and hiring illegally-present day laborers. Creates misdemeanors for aiding and abetting illegal aliens; Ban illegal aliens from state universities and colleges;

•Prohibits sanctuary policies and provides non-compliance penalties;

•Requires the Attorney General to apply for a 287(g) MOU
for state police;

•Creates a crime for producing fake IDs; and

•Requires elementary and secondary schools to request a birth certificate for all enrolling students and to determine whether such children were born outside of the U.S. or are children of illegal aliens requiring English-as-a-Second-language classes. Requires the collection of statistics and a determination of the costs related to illegal-alien students


15 posted on 06/06/2011 10:30:11 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to preserve it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

b


16 posted on 06/06/2011 10:32:15 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: commish

Wow I like that one!

Is it law yet?


17 posted on 06/06/2011 10:35:40 AM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
This happened to be the case before the court, and the court did the right thing.

The day can't come soon enough for me when the SCOTUS is asked to rule in some way on what really is the official sanctioning of illegal immigration. I just pray for the health of the non-leftwing nutbar court members.

18 posted on 06/06/2011 10:43:04 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: free me

Will be soon. Just waiting for the Gov. to sign it now.


19 posted on 06/06/2011 10:46:47 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to preserve it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: free me
As of 11:00 AM locally today,

The legislation, which critics say encourages racial profiling, is awaiting Gov. Robert Bentley’s signature. Leaders of the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU Alabama said they expected to file suit unless the governor, who has publicly supported such a crackdown, vetoes it.

20 posted on 06/06/2011 10:48:09 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson