Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Orders Review of Hazelton, PA Immigration Laws (Tosses Appeals ruling!)
FoxNews.com ^ | 06-06-2011 | StandWithArizona.com

Posted on 06/06/2011 9:51:15 AM PDT by montag813

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: angcat
Ten years ago Hazleton was advertising section 8 housing in the New York Post.

Hagerstown, MD, and a 1000 other town did the same thing. Now they can't get rid of the SOBs. The crap landlords have spent all their money and now the housing needs years of deferred maintenance.

Also Section 8 vermin spend 24/7 in these apartments and just wear them out. Ya want section 8? OK, take a drug test.

41 posted on 06/06/2011 2:21:56 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (We live in America's "Awkward" Era. Too late to fix the country. Bit too early to start shooting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Oh, Ok.


42 posted on 06/06/2011 2:29:52 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: brityank

I think you’re correct and that means the percentage of the population on assistance is MUCH higher.


43 posted on 06/06/2011 3:05:31 PM PDT by MSF BU (YR'S Please Support our troops: JOIN THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: brityank; Jim Robinson
#2 thru #15 combined don't add up to California's $3.28 billion welfare burden.

You Golden Staters are so screwed. Sorry, Jim.

If there was a Conservative diaspora from California into Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico there would not be a Democrat president for another 20 years.

44 posted on 06/06/2011 3:14:39 PM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
The legislation, which critics say encourages racial profiling, is awaiting Gov. Robert Bentley’s signature. Leaders of the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU Alabama said they expected to file suit unless the governor, who has publicly supported such a crackdown, vetoes it.

So--the critics stereotype every illegal immigrant as a Mexican, and then accuse people wanting to clamp down on illegal immigration of engaging in racial profiling. It makes perfect sense. < /sarc >

45 posted on 06/06/2011 3:30:50 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eva
the left to demagogue this issue and in so doing try to discredit the conservative members of the court.
Yeah, like that would be a first.
46 posted on 06/06/2011 4:17:13 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"I'd suppose if you can restrict ownership you can certainly restrict rental!"

I swear where I live illegals have bought homes.

47 posted on 06/06/2011 4:48:29 PM PDT by Spunky (Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eva
This decision to take this case must be looked at carefully because there is potential for the left to demagogue this issue and in so doing try to discredit the conservative members of the court.

And that is why they have lifetime tenure. They are where the buck stops on deciding what is law and what isn't. The Supremes need not worry about lefty demagogues who continuly come and go over the years. Go ahead you illegal alien apologist boot lickers, whine and wail away all you want.

48 posted on 06/06/2011 4:58:31 PM PDT by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: magna carta

Illegal immigrants who return after deportation commit more crimes, study finds

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-jail8-2008sep08,0,1103613.story
In L.A. County, 75% of inmates who reenter the U.S. engage in more criminal activity within a year. The rate is less for illegal immigrants who have never been ordered to leave.
Illegal immigrants who have been deported at least once from the United States are far more likely than other immigrants to repeatedly commit crimes, according to a study by the nonprofit Rand Corp.
The data indicated that illegal immigrants, overall, were not a greater crime risk, according to the study, which looked at all inmates released from Los Angeles County Jail for a month in 2002.
But among those who previously had been deported, reentered the U.S. and were arrested and released from jail, nearly 75% went on to commit another crime within a year. And 28% were arrested three or more times during the one-year period.
The recidivism rate was much lower for illegal immigrants who had not been previously deported, with 32% of those inmates being rearrested within a year and 7% arrested three or more times during that year.

Read more at latimes.com ...
________________________________________

Wow. I’m shocked.

Congressman’s son caught smuggling immigrants
http://www.kvoa.com/global/Story.asp?s=9022198
Dems have a different understanding of “bringing in the votes”.


49 posted on 06/06/2011 5:10:55 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: commish

The great thing about several states enacting similar legislation will be the mass exodus to sactuary cities and states who will be quickly overwhelmed by the services provided to illegals that local taxpayers will have to foot. I love it. Run, pedro, run.


50 posted on 06/06/2011 5:34:24 PM PDT by Rocketwolf68 (Bring back the crusades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: randita

Barletta would certainly get my vote.I really like the guy.


51 posted on 06/06/2011 5:43:24 PM PDT by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: commish

"•Requires the Attorney General to apply for a 287(g) MOU for state police;

Here's what I don't get: The US federal government, via the US Constitution, 287(g) of the Immigration law, and the RICO clauses which permit citizen claims against illegal harbor, explicitly corroborate the illegality, identification, and citation of illegal aliens. In other words our federal representatives in the past have clearly stated illegal immigration is a crime and should be addressed.

So what possible argument is their permitting illegal residence in our country? Other than blatant contemporary legislation from the outlaw judicial bench, which counters all previous legislative actions?

You can't have national representative government (our representation) clearly enacting one thing, then any bandit leftist judge come along and rule otherwise. That's blatant leftism, where the "law" is invoked for some private agenda using the denial, and forgetting, of well founded precedent.

If there is a body of people (e.g. la raza) who want amnesty for illegal US invaders then they must go to the US federal government and get fundamental federal laws reversed. No?

52 posted on 06/06/2011 5:50:33 PM PDT by jnsun (The Left: the need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Target the politicians every two, four or six years.


53 posted on 06/06/2011 6:49:56 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Excellent news!

May Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy stay safe and healthy.

54 posted on 06/06/2011 7:23:03 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

We still have a slim chance. If we can just keep these socialists like Giuliani and Romney from winning our primaries with “ WINNER TAKE ALL” . Do NOT let this happen!! Palin is ready to explode on the political scene. The commies hate her worst of all and we need to cram her down!!! STOP WINNER TAKE ALL” STOP IT NOW!!


55 posted on 06/06/2011 7:37:13 PM PDT by delbertt (Toilets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: angcat
Ten years ago Hazleton was advertising section 8 housing in the New York Post. They invited the garbage and now the town is ruined. It was always 50 years behind but without crime. Now you avoid going downtown. When I head to the mall these days I don't wear my good jewlery anymore the same goes for when I go food shopping. Kinda like when we use to head to Yankee Stadium on the subway.

Lots of good towns and cities were ruined by an influx of illegal immigrants that turned these places into the same kind of cesspools they had back in their homeland. The culture of many of these people is so far different from our own that assimilation is doubtful. They are accepting of illegal behavior.

But what really needs done is publishing the names and addresses of the landlords who profit from subsidies of Section 8 housing. I know some myself who claim to be good conservative Republicans while they have their greedy little palm up to the government for their cut of the action. These people are the problem just as those who hire illegals are the problem. They ruin the country for more profits. Publish their names. Start a national website and call it a hall of shame of employers and Section 8 landlords.

56 posted on 06/06/2011 7:54:53 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: montag813

great news. thanks for posting it.


57 posted on 06/06/2011 8:14:27 PM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Bastards.


58 posted on 06/06/2011 8:22:40 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

In regards to Lou: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2730678/posts


59 posted on 06/06/2011 8:37:16 PM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Interesting. I think Lou should trust the Tea Party folk to out shout the disruptors rather than ban them altogether. And make sure there are plenty of peace keepers that can quickly remove those who step over the line.

Closed meetings do not cut it. The Dems tried that prior to the 2010 election.


60 posted on 06/06/2011 8:42:23 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson