Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC's Lauer Claims Breitbart Breaking Weiner Story Violated Conservative Principles
NewsBusters ^ | 6-7-2011 | Kyle Drennen

Posted on 06/07/2011 9:16:53 AM PDT by smoothsailing

NBC's Lauer Claims Breitbart Breaking Weiner Story Violated Conservative Principles



Kyle Drennen

June 7, 2011

In an interview with Andrew Breitbart on Tuesday's NBC Today, co-host Matt Lauer suggested the conservative blogger should not have broken news of the scandal involving Congressman Anthony Weiner: "Did you worry that – you know, as a conservative, you don't want government in people's bedrooms. And so did you stop and have a debate with yourself about that?"

Moments earlier, Breitbart had noted feeling some sympathy for Weiner during Monday's press conference: "I felt so unbelievably sad for this guy." Lauer responded by wondering why that sympathy didn't keep the BigGovernment.com creator from posting Weiner's racy tweet last week: "But if you're sad for the guy then, did you not consider that at some point you might be sad for him when you first posted that photo ten days ago?"

In response to Lauer's bizarre assertion that reporting on the scandal somehow went against conservative values, Breitbart explained: "I'm not the government. You know, he tweeted to, you know, 45,000 people that image. A person sent it to me. I can't think of a world in which that isn't news."

Later in the interview, Lauer was suspicious of a more graphic x-rated photo of Weiner that Breitbart had not released: "Is this, Andrew, some kind of x-rated insurance policy?...Because people have characterized it as something more." Breitbart replied: "I don't like to think of it that way."

Lauer pressed further, sparking this exchange:

LAUER: Under no circumstance will you release that? In other words, let's say Anthony Weiner supporters target you in some other way?

BREITBART: If Anthony Weiner decides to make this a jihad against me for his interpretation of putting me into this situation, you know what, I'll take that as a – you know, you said an insurance policy. Maybe. I can't foresee a circumstance in which I would release that. I don't think I want to put his family through that type of thing. But for instance, I've already started to hear words that Megan, the woman who came forth, people are prying through her private life. And they're-

LAUER: So would you use that photo to protect these women?

BREITBART: That's – you know, I'm not thinking of it that way, but I certainly have it in my possession. And I guarantee you he would use this against me and the people on the left side of the blogosphere would have used this against me. I could have put that out there and his career would have been over today.

In his final question to Breitbart, Lauer wondered: "Had you come into possession of photographs of a Republican congressman that were similar in nature to the photograph you received of Anthony Weiner, would you have been as quick to post that photograph?" Breitbart replied: "Yes....I'm repulsed when it's, when it's, you know, Larry Craig that's involved in these type of behaviors or Ensign, the Senator from Nevada....these guys put themselves in a blackmail-able situation."

Breitbart then added: "The problem is, is that there is the mainstream media. They've got the resources and they're usually there to cover it. My contention, it's my belief, is that there is a double standard in the media in how they treat Republicans and Democrats."

.................

Full transcript at LINK


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nbcnews; partisanmedia; weiner; weinergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: smoothsailing
Weiner is a pervert, and Lauer is now defending the actions of this pervert. What does this say about Lauer?
41 posted on 06/07/2011 9:56:49 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Is Breitbart the gov't? Where exactly did Breitbart call for gov't to get involved? Lauer's more than a bit confused, as usual.

You gotta understand how libs think. They think everything belongs to the gov't. Your money, your property, you.

42 posted on 06/07/2011 9:56:49 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

France Matt has no earthly idea about conservatism, so he is wholly unqualified to speak on the subject.


43 posted on 06/07/2011 9:58:42 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Come on Lauer, use your brain besides something to cut down the echo in your head. Since when does the bedroom extend to the congresman’s office?


44 posted on 06/07/2011 9:59:54 AM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Lauer"s a sniveling twerp.

Isn't that a type of bird? LOL!

Photobucket

45 posted on 06/07/2011 10:00:28 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
What Lauer is actually saying is that Breitbart is somehow at fault for giving public exposure to something that puts Lauer in a position where he either has to cover it objectively as a news story or defend a depraved misogynist like Anthony Weiner Tony Dick for purely partisan reasons.
46 posted on 06/07/2011 10:00:36 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I have to get in on this:

BYMB!

47 posted on 06/07/2011 10:02:12 AM PDT by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Seems to me, as the facts came out, that Wiener put his bedroom into our government, not the other way around, as Lauer claims.


48 posted on 06/07/2011 10:07:16 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

“All remaining claims to legitimacy for the old media depend upon the crumbling pretense that what they present to the American public is factual and unbiased, rather than contrived and contorted.”

Great post!


49 posted on 06/07/2011 10:07:42 AM PDT by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
He'd have a hard time winning such a case because he'd have to demonstrate that he actually suffered some kind of harm or monetary loss as a result of the defamation.

Do threats to himself and his family resulting from Weiner's instigation count? I would think they do.

Weiner is was clearly abusing the power of his position at Breitbart's peril and should know that leftist activists would act upon his behalf. Brietbart is being no monstrous media corporation capable of mounting an extensive defense and Weiner knows that too.

I've seen less cause than that wind up in court before.

50 posted on 06/07/2011 10:11:41 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Isn't that a type of bird?

It most certainly is and you've identified them correctly. LOL!

51 posted on 06/07/2011 10:15:20 AM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Where the hell are these lib media types getting their logic?

The liberal mind is a logic-free environment. It resembles a bento box like structure where mutually contradicting ideas can be safely kept from colliding with one another.

In the end, there is only the narrative. And that's whatever they say it is.

Madness.

52 posted on 06/07/2011 10:17:48 AM PDT by Noumenon ("One man with courage is a majority." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Andrew didn’t go anywhere near his bedroom. I think I can bank on that. lol


53 posted on 06/07/2011 10:19:41 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Oh, I know for a fact that Breitbart has cause and standing to file a lawsuit. I'm just pointing out that the end result of the legal action would likely be a jury decision in Breitbart's favor -- and Breitbart getting a $1 settlement to pay for the "damages" that he can actually document.

The irony of this whole thing is that the whole "power structure" related to Weiner's official position has been turned upside down. At this point in time, we now have a humiliated U.S. Congressman (Weiner) who will never be able to screw with Breitbart again because of the leverage that Breitbart has with the additional photo(s) he has in his possession.

If the rumor I've seen floating around out there today about this mysterious photo is even remotely true, then the only question left to answer is whether Weiner leaves office by resigning or by doing harm to himself.

54 posted on 06/07/2011 10:20:56 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Yeah, but the internet is not his bedroom. He caused many woman to be nauseated. That is abuse, and we don’t like it.


55 posted on 06/07/2011 10:23:02 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

And, in the first place, what in the $%#@! would Lauer UNDERSTAND, much less KNOW, ANYTHING about anyone’s Conservative principles.

And worse, as an admission that HE and his media friends are part of government - as in the state media operations they are running for Obama, he equates Breitbart’s release of the Weiner information with the “government” releasing it.

That’s no Freudian slip. That’s Laeur’s idea of who he is coming through in how he thinks of the role of others, like him, in the media.


56 posted on 06/07/2011 10:24:00 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: synbad600
Photobucket
57 posted on 06/07/2011 10:30:08 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Put this picture out there and be done with it. I think it is worse, and not particularly professional, to tease it.


58 posted on 06/07/2011 10:31:59 AM PDT by Hildy (Hollywood liberals once embraced Communism "because they hadn't invented Pilates yet"- David Mamet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

That’s okay, Matt. Some blogger out there will be posting your Twitter photos soon...


59 posted on 06/07/2011 10:33:06 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I love how left-wing loony liberals think they have a clue what conservative principles are. Analysis requires research -- something the left-wing loony liberal media has shown itself COMPLETELY incapable of. Thank you, Obama, for exposing the hypocrisy of the media. Thank you Breitbart for filling the void.


60 posted on 06/07/2011 10:35:04 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson