Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do more on jobs, Dems tell Obama (aims to make it easier, cheaper to create private sector jobs)
The Hill ^ | 6/10/11 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 06/10/2011 8:26:27 AM PDT by Libloather

Do more on jobs, Dems tell Obama
By Alexander Bolton - 06/10/11 06:00 AM ET

Senior Senate Democrats are growing frustrated by what they see as President Obama’s passivity on the economy, and are beginning to discuss a large infrastructure package funded by tax increases.

Some Democrats, such as Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, who serves as chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, think such a package could lower the unemployment rate by as much as two percentage points.

But the plan is not without political risk — Republicans would be quick to slap Democrats with the old “tax-and-spend liberals” label. And the prospect of passing such a plan through the GOP-led House of Representatives — where conservative freshmen hold significant clout — is slim.

“I am concerned about the Obama administration’s approach on this,” Harkin said. “It always has been about jobs. I think the administration kind of got snookered talking about the deficit and the debt after the last election.

“The last election was about jobs and the economy, and now we’re in a position where we really do need some economic pump-priming by the federal government,” he said.

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, endorsed Harkin’s argument for more infrastructure spending, and said it is gaining support in the broader caucus.

“There’s very broad support,” Rockefeller said. “There’s no other way to get at this problem.”

Rockefeller said a spending package was discussed at several meetings Wednesday and that there’s a recognition Democrats need to be tougher in negotiations with Republicans.

“We have to be much more aggressive about all this, because as soon as they say ‘We’re not going to do that,’ as they’ve been saying for so long about so many things, you just kind of say ‘oh.’ We’ve got to stop saying ‘oh,’ ” he said, referring to the hard line Republicans have taken for Medicare cuts and against tax increases.

Even centrists like Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) say a major infrastructure package funded by tax revenue-generating measures is what’s needed to strengthen the economy. But Conrad wants a smaller package than some of his more liberal colleagues. He has suggested $100 billion in infrastructure spending.

Conrad estimates the Treasury loses about $1.1 trillion in revenue a year in special tax breaks — or what some Democrats call tax expenditures. Some of these tax breaks — subsidies for oil companies and breaks for companies that relocate factories overseas, for example — could be ended to fund infrastructure projects.

“We have a significant shortfall in the trust fund to pay for transportation. How do you pay for it? You got to pay for it with other spending cuts or additional revenue,” Conrad said. “I would prefer to go after offshore tax havens to pay for it.”

Conrad, citing data from the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, said closing these offshore tax havens could generate up to a $100 billion a year.

Senior Democrats discussed the prospect of a major infrastructure package at meetings Wednesday, and several endorsed the idea, according to Democratic sources.

Jared Bernstein, former chief economist to Vice President Biden, said Democrats should not shy away from spending money to energize the economy.

“There are some things you can do without spending money, but that’s obviously a very tough constraint and not one that politicians should accept,” he said.

Bernstein, who met with the Democratic Caucus Thursday, said it would be ambitious to hope that more infrastructure spending could reduce unemployment by 2 points, but nevertheless said it’s a smart idea.

“Given the realities and politics around it, any package that would create some jobs through infrastructure investment, I would support,” he said.

Even if Democrats can move a significant infrastructure-spending package paid for by closing tax subsidies through the Senate, pushing it through the House would be much tougher.

“It would never get through the House of Representatives,” Conrad said.

But it might have a better chance if it were added to a massive deficit-reduction package that saves $4 trillion or more over the next decade.

Democrats are concerned about a report released last week by the Labor Department showing the economy added only 54,000 jobs in May and that the unemployment rate increased to 9.1 percent.

Democratic leaders have felt their hands tied by the $1.6 trillion federal deficit and a constant barrage of Republican criticism over spending.

Centrist Senate Democrats facing tough reelections are even reluctant to raise the national debt ceiling if a plan is not accompanied by spending cuts. This has underscored the political reality that jobs legislation cannot pass if its costs are not offset by tax increases or other cuts.

The tight budget picture has forced Democrats to advance relatively modest jobs bills, such as the reauthorization of the Economic Development Administration, now pending on the Senate floor. Democrats want to boost the agency’s budget to $500 million a year, a small increase compared to the roughly $15 trillion national economy.

“It’s small but it’s helpful, it’s in the area where unemployment is, which is largely unskilled people who need a manufacturing-type job,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).

Without ending tax breaks to fund new stimulus legislation, jobs bills will have to remain modest.

“The political, fiscal situation combined almost puts handcuffs on governmental actions. It’s frustrating,” she said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dems; elections; jobs; keynesian; obama
Obama aims to make it easier, cheaper to create private sector jobs
1 posted on 06/10/2011 8:26:30 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

RE: Do more on jobs, Dems tell Obama

The Dems ought to look at themselves in the mirror.

How about repealing Obamacare, one of the biggest inhibitors of hiring in the country. Start with that.


2 posted on 06/10/2011 8:28:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Do more on jobs? Just get out of the way. It’s all of their “doing” that has created this mess. Undo your doing then get out of the way.


3 posted on 06/10/2011 8:29:25 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So Porkulus at $787 billion wasn’t enough?

I understand that not all of the original Porkulus money has even been spent. Yet now they want more. But this one will be a special infrastructure Porkulus.

But we were told that Porkulus was aimed at roads and other infrastructure in the first place.

What the heck????? Are these Democrats being less than truthful, less than open about all the facts? I would be shocked, just shocked, if that were the case.


4 posted on 06/10/2011 8:29:39 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Dems have always had just one idea: tax-and-spend. They ought to just get out of the way.


5 posted on 06/10/2011 8:31:38 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Obie couldn’t run a flipping lemonade stand. Why the Sam Hill anyone believes he has any idea about economics, job creation, wealth creation, cause and effect relationships relative to human behavior is beyond me.


6 posted on 06/10/2011 8:31:49 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (JMO but I reserve the right to be wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best
Just get out of the way

That was exactly my thought when I read the headline. Anyone who has read a basic book on economics understands that government is seen as a negative influence on prosperity and job creation. Obama can help us by resigning with Joe Biden and putting some adults in office.

7 posted on 06/10/2011 8:32:07 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Cheaper to hire today but how about the down the road costs? Since that is as clear as zeros past I and others will not hire.


8 posted on 06/10/2011 8:32:24 AM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The tight budget picture has forced Democrats to advance relatively modest jobs bills

They want to grow the economy by raising taxes, increasing government spending, and by regulating private business. But due to the disastrous economy, they are having a difficult time getting these "solutions" enacted. But they're still trying!

9 posted on 06/10/2011 8:33:08 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best

With the economic malaise we’re in, and if Obama is defeated for re-election, Obama could well become Jimmy Carter II, as far as history is concerned. Carter will go down in history as an utterly ineffective president, and Obama could join Jimmy in that club.

Jimmy likes to brag about how much he has accomplished in his years after leaving the White House. I wonder what Barack plans to do when his term is up. Probably he will rake in millions making speeches, as Bill Clinton did. That way, Michelle can still afford to take planeloads of hangers-on with her on vacations to Spain and wherever else she wants to go.

Anybody else notice that Michelle seems to take a lot of trips without Barack? The MSM hardly mentions that.


10 posted on 06/10/2011 8:33:39 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
There's at least one kind of infrastructure project I could support whoeheartedly. Let's take $30B or so and use it to build fences, etc. to truly secure our southern borders.
11 posted on 06/10/2011 8:36:40 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Infrastructure jobs would mean more deficit spending and more TAXES.

Get rid of Obamacare, the regulations that strangle businesses, Dodd-Frank which is a gift to the financial class, and a host of other bureaucratic nightmares, get banks to get off their duffs holding trillions to cover the inevitable default on the debt swaps and hedges and free up capital and the private sector will grow.

Oh, and stop giving foreign aid all over the world,and pull out bases from Europe.


12 posted on 06/10/2011 8:37:03 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best

I read last night that it actually was the overvalued stock market that created this mess. And that buy and hold strategy stock market analysts are too embarrassed to admit it.


13 posted on 06/10/2011 8:37:12 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Democrats are growing frustrated by what they see as President Obama’s passivity on the economy, and are beginning to discuss a large infrastructure package funded by tax increases.

Democrats have no idea what they are doing. They want a tax increase to fund a "large infrastructure package". This does not create JOBS, it creates WORK. Which then ENDS when it's over.

14 posted on 06/10/2011 8:37:12 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Tony Weiner - Internet Flasher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The dems are totally out to lunch. Their first infrastructure heavy stimulus plan did nothing to help the economy as you can see here (http://libertarian-neocon.blogspot.com/2011/06/visual-proof-of-failed-stimulus.html) and now they actually think doing more will help anything? I dont remember hiring union labor to fix bridges and roads actually creates wealth, only cutting taxes and regulations does that.


15 posted on 06/10/2011 8:37:17 AM PDT by libertarian neocon (And they want to do more infrastructure spending???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Create more private sector jobs? Simple. Get the [expletive deleted] out of the way.


16 posted on 06/10/2011 8:39:29 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 869 of our national holiday from reality. - Obama really isn't one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
and are beginning to discuss a large infrastructure package funded by tax increases.

Wow. Talk about just not getting it. These guys aren't just ordinary stupid, they're extra special stupid.

17 posted on 06/10/2011 8:40:34 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Yeah, like AGGRESSIVELY cutting spending and reducing the tax burden on business. Douchebag.


18 posted on 06/10/2011 8:42:00 AM PDT by OriginalChristian (The end of America, as founded, began when the first Career Politician was elected...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Fact: POTUS Obama is never going to lift a finger to create private sector jobs. Bottom line is: Obama is at heart and soul, a communist, anti-American and...he wants to take down the USA economy. Now, whether it’s his socialist dogma, or threats from the Soros, Wright, Farrakhan, Ayres, types, we probably will never know. Harken better ante up real quick, along with the rest of the Democrat caucus, to force Obama to resign or impeach this un-American failure of a POTUS. The American business community, the American people have Obama’s number and....they want him out of office right now!!!


19 posted on 06/10/2011 8:42:16 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

“Why the Sam Hill anyone believes he has any idea about economics, job creation, wealth creation, cause and effect relationships relative to human behavior is beyond me.”

But...but...but...he’s managed to make *himself* quite wealthy.


20 posted on 06/10/2011 8:42:51 AM PDT by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; unkus; flat; freekitty; MamaDearest

More jobs? Hussein will add more Czars to speed up their destruction of the US economy and US Constitution.


21 posted on 06/10/2011 8:44:18 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Simply tear up all the policies Obama has signed into law or regulation.

Obamacare, EPA, Interior Dept, Treasury, the Fed, etc...


22 posted on 06/10/2011 8:44:33 AM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

How can the Obamaloon create jobs for a sector he’s never worked in?

(And for a sector that would never hire him, since he has no demonstrable abilities - save for creating CO2 and stink...)


23 posted on 06/10/2011 8:45:32 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Senior Senate Democrats are growing frustrated by what they see as President Obama’s passivity on the economy, and are beginning to discuss a large infrastructure package funded by tax increases.

I didn't have to read anything after this first statement. Absurd and irresponsible. These people are out to destroy America.

24 posted on 06/10/2011 8:45:59 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Did I mention making the Unions, Goldman Sachs, and GE pay back all of the bribes they’ve received?


25 posted on 06/10/2011 8:46:50 AM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Obama will NOT do anything that works, which is slashing taxes and regulations. If he did that NOW in 18 months we could be looking at 4% growth and real UE decreases and the Republicans could be looking at 1996 all over again. But he won't, he and his ilk want to run the country into the ground and then rebuild it , Cloward and Piven. You have to remember he does NOT want to be a good President he wants to be a liked and loved by the left and the intelligencia. He cant because of his wiring have a “Come to Jesus” moment and reverse his course. He could not sell it to the Rachael Maddows, Ed Shultzs,John Stewarts and the others in the insane , demented far left. They would rather the country starve than an oil company make one more dollar in profit. The kooks and mentally ill are truly shaping opinion and running the government right now. UE will be in the 9’s and growth at 1-2% November 2012 and he will still be screaming the same memes, “Headwinds”,”Stay the course”, etc.
26 posted on 06/10/2011 8:47:00 AM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Stuff your tax increases!!!!


27 posted on 06/10/2011 8:50:40 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best

>Do more on jobs? Just get out of the way.

let’s make it more simple: have the kenyan klown resign from office.


28 posted on 06/10/2011 8:50:54 AM PDT by max americana (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

>>> Do more on jobs, Dems tell Obama (aims to make it easier, cheaper to create private sector jobs)

Do more on jobs, Dems tell Obama

- not run for reelection
- to take a permanent hike
- take all those people he implanted at all levels with him
- admit he’s a fraud, the policies/treaties/laws he signed nullified


29 posted on 06/10/2011 8:51:00 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best

Yeah, it’s as if we’re in the SNL segment called “REALLY??”

The private sector has existed now for centuries in this country, and Bambi has yet to discover it.


30 posted on 06/10/2011 8:58:26 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
They will do some little thing, the economy will appear to recover, however briefly, by a measly 1% just before the election, the press will be all OH HAIL OBAMA HE SAVED US and he will win the re-election.
Sigh.

31 posted on 06/10/2011 9:02:56 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The Dems are skeered they are going to get their *sses handed to them in ‘12.


32 posted on 06/10/2011 9:10:15 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He’s doing the opposite, but will say he’s doing right for America.


33 posted on 06/10/2011 9:12:27 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

That was my first thought. I thought the Stimulous bill was aimed at infrastructure. At least that is what they told me. Sheesh


34 posted on 06/10/2011 9:12:51 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
What will George Sorros tell his puppet to do next in his efforts to destroy America?
35 posted on 06/10/2011 9:16:00 AM PDT by TYVets (Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Listen you stupid Dems this is how it works with you thieves.

TAX

SPEND

FAIL

Get out of our wallets and we’ll get the economy going.


36 posted on 06/10/2011 9:22:40 AM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Beginning of the crack-up.

They want to run on a huge WPA-style jobs program. This will NOT pass the House. Then they can run on blaming Republicans for failing to pass a second Porkulus which most of the public does not want in the first place.

Obama has enough problems and likely does not wish to skate into this one, which will only exacerbate the fissures opening up within this party.


37 posted on 06/10/2011 9:24:05 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TYVets

The last group of shovel ready jobs that didn’t materialize docent count.

This is the real pitch for shovel ready jobs.

Just curious. How will taking taxpayer money to build something create permanent jobs? The government will only contract to companies that donate to dems which means blue states and unions will benefit, while people who are out of work won’t have a shot.

No jobs will be created. This is money for unions to kick back for 2012.


38 posted on 06/10/2011 9:27:58 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Sarah Palin - She’s living rent-free inside the MSM’s heads. Credited to Lurk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I don't see much in this article about Dems wanting to make the economic climate more favorable for small businesses, but I do see them wanting to spend several billion more on government projects. Granted, I do think the country's infrastructure should be addressed because some of it is crumbling. But spending must be cut in a lot of other places before we free up those funds to fix the roads and such.
39 posted on 06/10/2011 9:30:40 AM PDT by Major Matt Mason (RINO's are more interested in defeating conservatives than they are in defeating Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Stupid Taxing Bastards,They have run up energy costs and the rabid alphabets,EPA and the rest! along with Zippy Care Who in the hell would hire anyone??


40 posted on 06/10/2011 9:34:30 AM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Let’s see. How ‘bout giving a bunch of money to the unions. THAT should do the trick.


41 posted on 06/10/2011 9:48:13 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Infra structure spending is not really private sector, it’s fascism, crony capitalism.

We have one of these projects being pushed in my county. It’s a GATEWAY project (UN Agenda 21/Wildlands). They are rail/port projects intended to connect ports around the world by rail, through rural areas, putting the rural areas off limits to development. The heinous project in my county is a COAL terminal. ...and guess who is supporting it. The REPUBLICANS and big labor.

That’s right, the Republicans in WA state have joined big labor in pushing a Democrat crony capitalist project with Goldman Sachs, Warren Buffet and other big Democrat donors. This project depends on federal funding, which Patty Murray has proposed S. 942. This won’t pass without Republican support in the House of Representatives.


42 posted on 06/10/2011 9:48:19 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“Beginning of the crack-up.”

No, considering that a GENERIC Republican can defeat Obama in the polls now, these senators, always displaying excellence in looking out for #1, are starting to panic. They know that their future is tied to a falling brick.

The public is NOT in the mood for ANY ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING OF ANY KIND. The democratic congress fired their shot and it missed, big-time.

Because “spending” is basically 50% of what Democrats know how to do, the other 50% being “taxing”, it’s game over.

I can only hope that Republicans don’t rise to the occasion and find a way to lose.


43 posted on 06/10/2011 9:50:14 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
AEP plants closing (currently listed at 600 jobs lost). Look where.......
44 posted on 06/10/2011 9:51:33 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Just curious. How will taking taxpayer money to build something create permanent jobs?

A wise man once said:

Liberals only stop spending when they run out of other peoples money to spend.

Today's liberal government is destroying jobs. As it is repeated again an again, government needs to get out of the way!!!!

We have only to look back to the Reagan years and we will see how government opened the gates for real grown in this country.

I saw the "attitude" of government in the '80s. I see the "attitude" of our public servants in government today. They are 180 degrees apart.

45 posted on 06/10/2011 10:56:14 AM PDT by TYVets (Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Repeal obamacare and get rid of the EPA.


46 posted on 06/10/2011 11:02:40 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

These morons still think more tax increases = more jobs. How grotesque.


47 posted on 06/10/2011 11:10:15 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson