Palin made a bunch of endorsements I don't agree with. Perry's choices of issues to lead on are of great concern to me.
Our nation is literally dying, Charles. Playing some kind of gotcha game with endorsement letters is exactly the kind of childish bullcrap that has helped to put us in this situation.
And that is precisly my point. Here's what I've been seeing around here lately:
"Santorum endorsed Romney and Specter. He's a RINO! We need Sarah, only Sarah!!"
"DeMint endorsed Romney. He's a RINO! We need Sarah, only Sarah!!"
"Bachmann stood next to Romney at a McCain-Palin rally once. She's a RINO! We need Sarah, only Sarah!!"
"Pawlenty said something good about Romney once. He's a RINO! We need Sarah, only Sarah!!"
It gets wearisome. But it only seems to go in one direction. Why don't these same people say:
"Palin endorsed Perry. Palin endorsed McCain. Heck, she was McCain's *running mate*! She's a RINO!! We need . . . we need . . . well, there's nobody left!"
So I'm looking at a range of possible candidates: Pawlenty, Perry, Palin, and more. All the candidates, including Palin, have their flaws. I want one that is generally conservative and that can win.