Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Weiner Secretly Convert to Islam to Marry a Muslim?
Floyd Reports ^ | 6/9/11 | Ben Barrack

Posted on 06/12/2011 12:21:23 AM PDT by Nachum

Omar Abu-Namous is the imam of the Islamic Cultural Center in New York and he is encouraging Huma Abedin – a practicing Muslim – to stand by her husband, New York congressman Anthony Weiner. Why would this imam support Anthony Weiner, who was raised Jewish, in a marriage with a practicing Muslim woman?

Every Islamic scholar agrees that it is forbidden for a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim. Former Muslim Walid Shoebat has translated the Arabic declarations relative to the validity of the marriage between Weiner and Abedin last year. One such publication Shoebat translated was the Al-Marsid newspaper, which reported on the Weiner/Abedin marriage specifically:

Dr. Anwar Shoeb of the faculty of Islamic law in Kuwait declared that the marriage between Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin is null and void, considering it adultery as confirmed in the Sharia position, prohibiting the marriage of a Muslim woman to a non-Muslim, regardless of whether he is a Jew or a Christian. In this case, he assured the invalidity of the marriage certificate between them.

Abu-Namous is in direct opposition to his Islamic superiors? Why?

Abedin was raised in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. In 2007, the New York Observer wrote (in an article no longer available but cross-posted at FreeRepublic.com) that her mother is a professor in Saudi Arabia and that her father was an Islamic scholar before his death.

Weiner was raised Jewish but admitted to growing up in a non-religious household. If Abedin remains a practicing Muslim and her religion forbids her from marrying a non-Muslim, isn’t she failing to practice Islam? Wouldn’t that be the case unless Weiner converted to Islam? The New York Times reported that Weiner “sometimes fasts with her (Abedin) during Ramadan.” This would indicate that the congressman is more amenable to practicing Islam than Abedin is to practicing Judaism.

Before people should start believing that Abu-Namous is of the more moderate persuasion, consider what he was quoted as saying in 2001:

A unified Muslim state would be the ideal instrument to convince the world that Islam is the last version of God’s word. God meant his word to be obeyed.

Moreover, Abu-Namous spoke alongside the director of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) at the First National Summit of Imams and Rabbis. ISNA is a Muslim Brotherhood group. Abu-Namous is on record as having said there was no conclusive evidence that Muslim were responsible for the September 11th attacks. Ironically, former ground zero mosque imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a permanent trustee with with the ICC. Abu-Namous’s predecessor at the ICC blamed the Jews for 9/11.

Presiding over the wedding of Weiner and Abedin was none other than Bill Clinton. It took place at the Oheka Castle in Huntington, NY on Long Island – barely more than thirty miles from the ICC where Abu-Namous served as the imam.

The Al-Marsid newspaper reported what Bill Clinton said. Shoebat translated:

Clinton spoke, presiding at the wedding about how the two met and how Abedin rejected Weiner in the beginning but the persistence of the latter did not make him give up….

Did Abedin reject Weiner because he was not Muslim? Why is a New York imam with ties to the ISNA and Feisal Abdul Rauf defending a non-Muslim male with a Muslim female?

Perhaps there is a more important question that needs to be answered. Did a secular Jewish man convert to Islam or did his (still) practicing Muslim wife abandon her religion by marrying him?

Ben Barrack is a talk show host on KTEM 1400 in Texas and maintains a website at www.benbarrack.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: anthonyweiner; convert; islam; newyork; secretly; weiner; weinergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-104 next last
Hmmmm
1 posted on 06/12/2011 12:21:26 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Who gives a crap? He’s a turd and so is she. Flush them both and move on.


2 posted on 06/12/2011 12:33:00 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (If you think it's time to bury your weapons.....it's time to dig them up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

it matters, because Weiner was being groomed for NYC Mayor. (remember the ground zero masjid?) and maybe one day, US President!
at the height of the Cold War, who wouldn’t care, if such a man married a KNOWN Communist agent?

Huma’s Father was an Islamic scholar, with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which has detailed plans (captured in raids) for infiltrating the US Government, and more.

And either Weiner converted, or Huma would be considered an apostate (married to a Jew), for which the penalty is death.

attempted “Honor Killings” are done for MUCH less, like the “Harry Potter” actress who simply dated a Hindu.

it is IMPOSSIBLE for a muslim female to be married to a non-muslim, and remain Muslim.
...if Weiner didn’t convert (which is very easy... just recite the Shahada kalima),
then Huma would be considered an apostate, married to a JEW.

...would the U.S. Secretary of State (Hillary), making official visits to Muslim countries, have an assistant who was considered to be a Muslim apostate ?


3 posted on 06/12/2011 12:39:42 AM PDT by Elendur (the hope and change i need: Sarah / Colonel West in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

and others have noted, she had a very expensive apartment, etc., for a college student.
...and Weiner certainly didn’t seem too devoted to her, even in this, the FIRST year of their marriage. so asking why he married her, is a fair question.


4 posted on 06/12/2011 12:48:53 AM PDT by Elendur (the hope and change i need: Sarah / Colonel West in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Like the Clintons and 0bamas they are commies. That is all they believe in.


5 posted on 06/12/2011 12:55:47 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Weiner is doing a pretty good job of self-destructing without anyone helping him out. But anything is possible. He will probably issue one of his famous not-quite-denials “I can’t account for every religion I might have converted to.”


6 posted on 06/12/2011 1:09:09 AM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Eventually we are going to have to take off the blinders and openly discuss the national security implications of allowing/having members of our government compromised by the Religion of Peace - a religion openly advocating the destruction of our constitutional form of government and it’s replacement with Sharia.

Call me a bigoted racist...it is still very much the truth.


7 posted on 06/12/2011 1:10:16 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

not everyone who says he or she is a observant moose may be telling the truth.

anyhow, the wedding was a secular one, no? so it doesn’t matter. going to a mosque/synagogue doesn’t make you a moose/Jew any more than sitting in a garage makes you a car.


8 posted on 06/12/2011 1:12:27 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

At least Woody Allen had angst.


9 posted on 06/12/2011 1:13:07 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’m not sure, but it’s fairly obvious he converted to ‘I slam’ to cheat on one. (I honestly don’t know if his wife is a Muslim or not though.)


10 posted on 06/12/2011 1:16:07 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Muslim Brotherhood (renames itself) the Liberty and Justice Party. NOT A JOKE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Hmmmm

Hmmmm is right. Hmmmm!
11 posted on 06/12/2011 1:21:07 AM PDT by PA Engineer (SP/AW12: Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

anyhow, the wedding was a secular one, no? so it doesn’t matter.

Is such a wedding even recognized by Islam?
Lots of questions.


12 posted on 06/12/2011 1:22:48 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Never seen a Jew convert to Islam in my 53


13 posted on 06/12/2011 1:31:53 AM PDT by wardaddy (ok...so far I am Palin/Rubio 2012....i can explain easy..just ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

*raised_eyebrow*


14 posted on 06/12/2011 1:32:57 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Oh, we’ll have that discussion. And it will be real short. It will take place when about a half million or more Americans are wiped out in one attack.


15 posted on 06/12/2011 1:45:26 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ridiculous.

Who the hell knows what the dynamic is in that household? I do find it odd that a Jew who has marched for Israel, would marry a Muslim, but despite her family tree, where is the evidence she’s devout, or an Islamic activist? There’s nothing that holds together this theory aside from a lack of sophistication. Is it really news for a Muslim man to take the side of the man, and shame the victimized woman? Is there a Muslim cleric who would sanction a secret conversion? You don’t understand Islam if you think so.

And fasting on Ramadan amounts to eating one meal a day for dinner...big deal...it’s a nice courtesy not to eat a cheeseburger in front of your Muslim girlfriend/wife, isn’t it? It doesn’t equate “secret Muslim convert”, it just means that the reality of intermarriage requires one to partake in certain harmless aspect of a tradition. Ramadan for a Muslim is more involved than fasting.


16 posted on 06/12/2011 1:46:41 AM PDT by harmonium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

“Never seen a Jew convert to Islam in my 53”

Never heard of Adam Gadahn?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn

Weiner doesn’t sound like the right type of crazy it takes.


17 posted on 06/12/2011 1:49:50 AM PDT by harmonium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

They might make an exception for lesbians in sham marriages if they are advancing an anti-Israel agenda.


18 posted on 06/12/2011 2:05:10 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“During a White House internship in 1996, Abedin was mistakenly assigned to the first lady’s office when she had requested to be in the press office. She has been a close aide to Hillary Clinton ever since.”
http://blogs.forbes.com/worldviews/2011/06/09/huma-abedin-anything-but-the-good-wife/

The article was written by another practicing female Muslim - obviously so when one reads it. Interesting how she got the job...’mistakenly assigned’ and they didn’t correct it. I know if I was mistakenly assigned it would be rectified. How do they both settle their differences in regards to the ME...

Weiner and Schumer are very pro-Israel, both are close friends, yet Schumer showed no support which is strange. Weiner has been doing this stuff for years and it suddenly surfaces...sometimes I get overly fanciful...there’s nothing the FBI doesn’t know about everyone is the WH...
http://mondoweiss.net/2011/06/weiner-repeatedly-lied-about-israel-and-palestine-does-anyone-care.html


19 posted on 06/12/2011 2:15:12 AM PDT by bronxville (Sarah will be the first American female president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Oh, we’ll have that discussion. And it will be real short. It will take place when about a half million or more Americans are wiped out in one attack.”

The worst part about this is that I totally believe that this is ‘exactly’ what it will take before the hand-wringers and those who choose to ignore the problem out there finally get a clue. In just 65 years we as a people have ‘willingly’ forgotten the lessons of WW2.

“Oh no! That will NEVER happen here/again/to me/us...”

Oh yes...it can.

Muslims and the ‘Arab Spring’ rioting around the world/acts of terror to numerous to list and somehow that will never happen here?

Not even 10 years since 9/11 and people have ‘willingly’ ignored that too.

God we suck.


20 posted on 06/12/2011 2:34:42 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A bigger question is: Are they really married? Remember the part of the ceremony where the priest, minister, judge, justice of the peace, captain of the ship says, “by the authority of xxxx and the state of xxxx I now pronounce you husband and wife”?

By what authority did Bill Clinton have to marry them? to marry ANYBODY? He’s an ex-President (of dubious moral authority). He’s NOT a minister, or a judge. In fact, he had his law license suspended for lying under oath.

Perhaps they are notreallly married at all. Perhaps it was all a sham to give cover to her close relationship with Hillary.


21 posted on 06/12/2011 2:43:47 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

All they need to do is get the marriage license signed and it’s legal. The rest is just for show.


22 posted on 06/12/2011 2:47:48 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Since she's in Saudi Arabia with her girlfriend Hillary it's almost guaranteed that Weiner converted to muslim before he married her or the Saudis would have killed her or at least forbidden her entry.

She shouldn't/won't care about his texting since he's short 3 wives of the maximum 4 allowed under muslim law.

23 posted on 06/12/2011 2:50:02 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

You mean that guy I dated in college who used to try to persuade me to do a “home run” by claiming that we would be married “in the eyes of God” by just pledging our love for each other in the moonlight was actually telling the truth?

Say it isn’t so! I didn’t believe him then, and now you are telling me that I hurt his poor little feelings unnecessarily! s/off

That was more than 50 years ago, and you are making me feel sorry for a guy who is probably dead!


24 posted on 06/12/2011 3:08:32 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I do know that, in Islamic tradition, a father can give permission for a daughter to marry outside her faith. Better for her to be married at all, then to be dependent upon the family forever is along the lines of that thinking.


25 posted on 06/12/2011 3:30:40 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart; TigersEye
Looking in my handy lefty BS dictionary:

bigot - anyone who doesn't change their opinion on command to whatever opinion they're ordered to have

racist - anyone who isn't part of the democrat fascist machine and who states the truth about a member of one of the groups the democrat machine has declared to be a protected group

OK, you bigoted racist, I agree with you 100%. We're being even more stupid than the French and British were when dealing with Hitler. As idiotic as they were, they didn't hand their own countries over to Hitler in exchange for a little paper that promised, “peace in our time”, they handed over someone elses country.

The leaders of the democrat fascist machine in this country, though, are so afraid of not achieving their final victory before they drop dead that they'll hand their own country over to pagan, moon worshiping, brainwashed, scum, just to enjoy being the powerful ruling class during their “golden years”. What comes after that they don't care.

Regards

26 posted on 06/12/2011 3:35:01 AM PDT by Rashputin (Obama is insane but kept medicated and on golf courses to hide it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

God and the US legal system have two very different opinions on what constitutes marriage ;)


27 posted on 06/12/2011 3:42:25 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Being ANYthing, a Jew, a Christian, a Muslim or Agnostic requires faith.

I've never heard anyone to be born a Christian, or a Catholic or even a Jew.

Your name may be Weiner or Goldstien or whatever, but that is genetics.

If a baby is born to two Catholics and is never baptized nor practiced (through the years) is he a Catholic?

If a baby is born to two Born Again Christians, but never receives Christ, is he born again?


So my take on this is, these are just two opportunistic, large egoed political types and their "religion" is in no way part of their thought processes.

If Huma was to ne subject to any Muslim retaliation, it would have happened a long time ago for a different reason, as a father/brother/uncle witnessed her rise in the way of life she chose many more years ago and before her marriage.

28 posted on 06/12/2011 3:43:32 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

And the saddest part (for them) is that the moment the scum take that power, the lefties that handed it to them on a silver platter will suddenly be too dead to enjoy the fruits of their labors.

“(Letter that comes after E)’ing idiots” does not begin to describe the left and the useful idiots therein.


29 posted on 06/12/2011 3:46:49 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Clarification - I meant “Signed/notarized by a judge”. I wasn’t referring to the people signing it and then magically they were married. Still, requires on ceremony, so your old beau was half right ;)


30 posted on 06/12/2011 3:49:25 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Edit #2...”no” ceremony...I need sleep ;)


31 posted on 06/12/2011 3:50:22 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

You dated Meatloaf?

;D


32 posted on 06/12/2011 4:02:06 AM PDT by Salamander (I wear my sunglasses at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

“In just 65 years we as a people have ‘willingly’ forgotten the lessons of WW2.”

The reason we as a people have forgotten the lessons of the past is our children are not taught anything about the greatness of our nation, much less what has been required to preserve it. To them our nation’s history is about the struggle of minorities oppressed by the white race and wicked capitalists. They are taught love of self and love of diversity instead of love of nation.


33 posted on 06/12/2011 4:14:23 AM PDT by Soul of the South (When times are tough the tough get going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

Absolutely, and that is very much by design.

Think about the old Kruschev (Or perhaps Lennin/Marx, can’t keep my Commies straight ;) line that went something like “Perhaps not you, but your children.” Not an exact quote but the meaning is clear enough.

There is a reason that Academia is the realm of the Left/Communist types and this is it. It has worked beautifully. Or to put it in a more Biblical sense, Teaching the kids that evil is good and good, evil...left is right, black is white, up is down, war is peace, freedom is slavery...

All there in the history books, but no one cares to read them... and the left is busily rewriting them all anyway to fit their version of history.

Orwell, Bradbury (F-451) Huxley (Brave New World) ... Even the ‘fiction’ writers got it right. But I don’t imagine they were intending to write ‘how-to’ manuals for the Left/Democrats.


34 posted on 06/12/2011 4:27:43 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

...”would the U.S. Secretary of State (Hillary), making official visits to Muslim countries, have an assistant who was considered to be a Muslim apostate ?”...

No..Unless, Hillary and Bill are so “in” that it doesn’t matter since the end justifies the means. Hypocrisy is the word in politics all over the world. We are truly like lambs going to the slaughter..It is so evident, unless God decides to save us...


35 posted on 06/12/2011 4:29:49 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

I’m more worried about the muslim already in the WH.


36 posted on 06/12/2011 4:31:26 AM PDT by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

That would certainly given him license to be unfaithful to huma in any form. I am particularly amused at whatever edict covers muzzzie men to be married for a day so that they can romp in the hay with those of their choosing.


37 posted on 06/12/2011 4:49:01 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Adding a little frivolity to the debacle that is Weiners' weiner, Johnathan Allen now on C-Spam is making the case for Weiner that "it was only sex". He describers the DNC and the media as having a feeding frenzy at the expense of poor fruit of the loom Weiner who was only guilty of being a staunch supporter or the far left. (such must be the case with Politico)where Politico stands in the left right equation those questions have been answered after watching this clown try and resurrect the wiener from the burnt hot dog pile for almost 15 minutes now.
38 posted on 06/12/2011 4:54:16 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

Excellent question. It;’s well known that both sides,Dems and pubbbies, of the political equation have sold out to the Saudis for millions. Is this the case with the Weiner? Hard to tell..We need hard facts.


39 posted on 06/12/2011 4:56:18 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Far from it. The islamists terrorists have been uniting with the far left all over the world. It’s our worst nightmare.


40 posted on 06/12/2011 4:57:34 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I am pretty sure Bill Clinton, who married the couple, had standards of his own in this....and it looks like theWeiner is a chip off the old block, Bill himself. Doesn’t seem to be any religion that would allow Bill to marry them was involved, so I am assuming neither of them practices any religion in reality.


41 posted on 06/12/2011 4:59:08 AM PDT by tioga (2012 - the year Obama gets slapped down....coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

And yet women here in the ‘west’ support/defend it.

Any woman that does sure isn’t one I’d want to be married to, nor raising, or even near my children. Likewise would any woman with an ounce of sense want to marry a Muslim man.

But they are all about love and peace and unicorns and rainbows, so it’s ‘us’ with a racism problem. It’s their ‘Culture!’

Yea and stool sitting in a petri dish has ‘culture’ too.


42 posted on 06/12/2011 4:59:51 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

NOT want to marry a Muslim man....ARGH! OK, really time for bed after that one.


43 posted on 06/12/2011 5:00:52 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

In my view the whole business of religion is irrelevant to the issue.

All involved are liberals. Liberals shun, loathe, reject religion. That is what liberalism is about.

Neither Weiner nor Huma are religious and reject both Judaism and Islam. They agreed to a civil sham ceremony to satisfy state law and establish rules for financial dealings between the two.

Both are American rejects and that fact should be placed at the top of the list from which judgements must be made.


44 posted on 06/12/2011 5:03:47 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Weiner did not convert to Islam so he he could marry Huma.

He converted for the 72 virgins he heard about.

45 posted on 06/12/2011 5:07:02 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The author had a page to fill up with a short paragraph of information and speculation.


46 posted on 06/12/2011 5:09:09 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Exactly, its money and power. Liberalism uber alles.


47 posted on 06/12/2011 5:09:27 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This was a wedding of convenience, in the same way royal families would arrange marriages to strengthen their kingdoms.

The Clintons strengthened their hold on the DNC through this wedding. The is a union of socialists and muslims, just like what we see in the middle east.

Also, just like royal families, these elites are allowed to cheat on their spouses unconditionally.

Getting caught requires the other spouse to make a public play for sympathy, yet still support their elected partner to ensure the kingdom’s hold on power.

Anyone who falls for this is a blind fool.


48 posted on 06/12/2011 5:12:53 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I believe in a less-expansive definition of “race”, limited to physical characteristics. Islam is an ideology, a political ideology that uses religion as a cloak and as a means of controlling the masses. I support a Constitutional Amendment removing it from the religious protections of the First Amendment and other legislation, since it is in reality a political system that seeks to supplant the Constitution and our system of government. The Constitution is not a suicide pact, and just because they hide behind the fascade of “religion” doesn’t mean we have to be foolish about it.

Beyond that, see tagline.


49 posted on 06/12/2011 5:27:38 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Do muslims allow pedophile, perverts to become muslims?


50 posted on 06/12/2011 6:16:34 AM PDT by chainsaw (I'd hate to be a democrat running against Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson