Freedom in the 50 States; An Index of Personal and Economic Freedom

Mercatus Center, George Mason University ^ | June 7, 2011 | Jason Sorens, William Ruger

[Eric Blair 2084]

This study comprehensively ranks the American states on their public policies that affect individual freedoms in the economic, social, and personal spheres. It updates, expands, and improves upon our inaugural 2009 Freedom in the 50 States study. For this new edition, we have added more policy variables (such as bans on trans fats and the audio recording of police, Massachusetts’s individual health-insurance mandate, and mandated family leave), improved existing measures (such as those for fiscal policies, workers’ compensation regulations, and asset-forfeiture rules), and developed specific policy prescriptions for each of the 50 states based on our data and a survey of state policy experts. With a consistent time series, we are also able to discover for the first time which states have improved and worsened in regard to freedom recently.

This project develops an index of economic and personal freedom in the American states. Specifically, it examines state and local government intervention across a wide range of public policies, from income taxation to gun control, from homeschooling regulation to drug policy.

[Eric Blair 2084]

1. Keep in mind, this is a libertarian think tank. Some of the people who they want to give freedom to, like gay marriage may not sit well.

2. Not shockingly, the bluest states are the least free.

The Democratic Peoples Republic of NY, CA, NJ are dead last.

[Eric Blair 2084]

Big Brother, Nanny State, Grant Junkie, Bogus Study, Junk Science, Social Engineering, Egalitarian, Central Planning, Sheeple Control, Food Cop, Smoke Nazi, Socialism, Collectivism

This is an extremely low volume ping list. 6 per week max. To be added to or deleted from this ping list, please click one of the following:

Eric, you are a genius add me to your ping list or Eric, you are a jackass, take me off this ping list

To request that I stop using these gay html colors and fonts, please send me a private message below.

____________________________________________________________________

Constitution of the Left Wing Nanny State of Liberals:

Picture courtesy of unixfox. All rights reserved. Copyright MMVII. Any use of the pictures descriptions or accounts of this ping without the express written consent of unixfox, Eric Blair, or Major League Baseball is strictly prohibited. Some restrictions apply. Ping not available in all states. For erections lasting longer than four hours, call the Guiness Book of World Records. Use only as directed.

Preamble:

We the People Sheeple of the United States Nanny State, in Order to form a more perfect Union Socialist Utopia, establish Justice Socially engineer a country of non smoking, physically fit, seat belt and helmet wearing teetotalers, ensure domestic Tranquility Smoking bans in bars, limits on unhealthy food and social drinking, provide for the common defense Universal Healthcare, promote the general Welfare health of the population whether they like it or not, in order to save above mentioned Universal Healthcare entitlement program from bankruptcy, and secure the Blessings of Liberty Dependency to ourselves progressive liberals and our Posterity Hitler Youth who we brainwash through public school education, do ordain decree and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Nanny State of Liberals.

[FightforFreedomCA]

Yeah! Way to go California! “We’re not last...we’re not last..” yeesh...

[nkycincinnatikid]

“keep in mind”
....that this attempt to quantify liberty is by...
“a LIBERTARIAN think tank”

Keep in mind Eric, what you just posted.

[Aria]

Gee, maybe I ought to quit plotting to leave Oregon for Washington.

[Aria]

Gee, maybe I ought to quit plotting to leave Oregon for Washington.

[magslinger]

27

MIping

If you wish to be added to or removed from the Michigan ping list, please post or FReepmail me.

[arderkrag]

Thank GOODNESS it’s a Libertarian group!

[Solitar]

This think tank with Jason Sorens also put Alaska at the bottom (44 out of 50). That’s the Jason Sorens of Free State Project infamy. I was a member of the FSP for a few years and thus know that Jason has even less grounding in the realities of state and local politics and economics than Obama.

Many of their individual criteria or ratings are graded from an idealistic anarcho-libertarian perspective. They ignore the reality facing which are relatively large, sparsely populated, resource dependent and military installation intensive.

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

State Freedom Rankings
1. New Hampshire
2. South Dakota
3. Indiana
4. Idaho
5. Missouri
6. Nevada
7. Colorado
8. Oregon
9. Virginia
10. North Dakota
11. Florida
12. Oklahoma
13. Iowa
14. Texas
15. Georgia
16. Tennessee
17. Kansas
18. North Carolina
19. Alabama
20. Utah
21. Wyoming
22. Arizona
23. Nebraska
24. Mississippi
25. Wisconsin
26. South Carolina
27. Michigan
28. Arkansas
29. Montana
30. Vermont
31. Pennsylvania
32. Kentucky
33. Maine
34. Minnesota
35. Louisiana
36. West Virginia
37. New Mexico
38. Connecticut
39. Delaware
40. Washington
41. Illinois
42. Ohio
43. Maryland
44. Alaska
45. Rhode Island
46. Massachusetts
47. Hawaii
48. California
49. New Jersey
50. New York

[Solitar]

Surprise, surprise, surprise
New Hampshire is #1 on Jason Sorens list.
There is a hidden agenda in that last.

This is a thinly veiled attempt to rig the list to attempt to boost the floundering Free State Project in New Hampshire.

To get the FSP members to pick New Hampshire in the election among ten candidate states for the FSP, Jason and the FSP boosters of New Hampshire not only cherry picked “statistics” to make New Hampshire look better, they outright lied in addition to using gross overstatments about New Hampshire.

[Solitar]

Surprise, surprise, surprise
New Hampshire is #1 on Jason Sorens list.
There is a hidden agenda in that last.

This is a thinly veiled attempt to rig the list to attempt to boost the floundering Free State Project in New Hampshire.

To get the FSP members to pick New Hampshire in the election among ten candidate states for the FSP, Jason and the FSP boosters of New Hampshire not only cherry picked “statistics” to make New Hampshire look better, they outright lied in addition to using gross overstatments about New Hampshire.

[Paladin2]

I don't agree at all with the weighting of issues in this report.

The cross plots are interesting though.

[cripplecreek]

If it were up to me I would rank Michigan higher on the personal freedom scale because we do pretty much as we please outside the cities anyway.

Seems to be a somewhat subjective rating system.

[arderkrag]

LIBERTARIAN FOR LIFE PING!

[Paladin2]

Having Levin and Levin Jr. as ‘representatives” seems to have a certain freedom limiting feeling.

[Aroostook25]

Seems to be a somewhat subjective rating system.

Not only subjective, but unfairly and even wrongly weighted too heavily on some economic factors.

Remember the authors are big "L" Libertarians who have little clue about life outside their anarchist utopian dreams.

[freeandfreezing]

Not only subjective, but unfairly and even wrongly weighted too heavily on some economic factors.

So what would be an example of an unfair or wrong weighting?

Or, put another way, what's wrong with New Hampshire that would be improved by taking on some of the characteristics of states at the other end of the ratings list?

Or, which state do you think should be #1 for freedom?

[Cuttnhorse]

Wonder why Alaska is so far down?

[Cuttnhorse]

Happy to be living in #4

[terycarl]

Happy to be living in #4

My man Mitch Daniels has me living in number three.....thanks Indiana Republicans!!!!!

[Eric Blair 2084]

I just work here. Libertarians have been in favor of freedom before we were born.

I’m not sure what your point is.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Maryland’s ahead of Alaska? WTF???

Maryland “Freak State” PING!

[Eric Blair 2084]

"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals–if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is. Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say, because I think that like in any political movement there are shades, and there are libertarians who are almost over at the point of wanting no government at all or anarchy. I believe there are legitimate government functions. There is a legitimate need in an orderly society for some government to maintain freedom or we will have tyranny by individuals. The strongest man on the block will run the neighborhood. We have government to insure that we don’t each one of us have to carry a club to defend ourselves. But again, I stand on my statement that I think that libertarianism and conservatism are travelling the same path".

--Ronald Reagan

Inside Ronald Reagan: A Reason Interview from July 1975

[Aroostook25]

So what would be an example of an unfair or wrong weighting? Or, put another way, what's wrong with New Hampshire that would be improved by taking on some of the characteristics of states at the other end of the ratings list?

Their weighting of local, state and federal government employment and spending. From the report is this quote

Analysis
Alaska’s big problem is fiscal policy. Over a quarter of the state’s workforce is employed by state or local government, and that figure does not include federal employees. Alaska has the highest debt and government spending to personal income ratios in the country. However, Alaska does extremely well on personal freedom, scoring fifth on our ranking. Reasons for its score include fully legalized possession of small amounts of marijuana (accomplished through a court ruling), the least-restrictive gun laws in the country, strong asset-forfeiture protections, recognition of same-sex domestic partnerships, and possibly the best homeschooling laws in the country. On economic regulation, Alaska does poorly on labor law, occupational licensing, and eminent-domain reform but relatively well on health-insurance regulation.

[CapnJack]

Live Free or Die baby!

We have the best license plates in the country and apparently we mean what it says.

[Lando Lincoln]

Hmmm... Alaska #44

[Eric Blair 2084]

Can’t blame you for critical thinking. Trust but verify. Some people have an agenda and will lie.

I don’t think that’s the case here.

[hoosierham]

I and a whole lot of Hoosiers voted for the Libertarian candidate who was Dick Lugar’s only opposition last time;the Democrats know he is one of them so no need to risk a “safe” vote.

[Eska]

I don't care about no stinkin lists.

All I know is I live along the Yukon and don't have any prop taxes and live in a big log cabin that I heat with wood I get for free. Where we don't have any state taxes like income or sales. Where I don't have any law enforcement hiding in the weeds collecting revenue. Where we don't have any organized local govt, means no comp planning, or regulations, or ordinances, or services to grow govt. And most importantly live 200 miles from nearest paved road and our dirt road is only open a few months every summer to get supplies.

When I ride the 4 wheeler in on our summit and look for 100 miles in all directions and see wilderness and no human impact whatsoever; I realize what freedom really is and how much my freedom means to me; why I call this country home. List or no list.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[freeandfreezing]

OK, that sounds like you think Alaska should rank higher than it does since there is too much emphasis in the ratings on the percentage of people employed by the government. I presume you don't think other states should emulate that, but that the measure unfairly downgrades Alaska due to its small population and unique circumstances.

All rankings suffer from trying to map a multidimensional set of characteristics into a single ordered list, it would be interesting to see how the Freepers would rate the states.

[Eric Blair 2084]

It would be interesting. That’s why I post it every year.

Studies can easily be bogus. Garbage in, garbage out. Like the one that found that Cuba’s healthcare system is better than the US.

[UnwashedPeasant]

Too bad that the states at the top of the Freedom Index are cold.

I’d like to see a list like this from the Cato Institute.

[NVDave]

Well, for starters, New Hampshire has dividend/interest income taxation, business income taxation, and property taxes that, in some towns, are out of sight. Holy crap, are some of their real estate taxes high in some places.

They make conspicuous use of zoning.

How NH makes it to the top of the list when states like Wyoming have no business income taxation, no passive or dividend taxation, no interest taxation, low real estate taxes and many counties have no zoning... I have no idea.

Idaho is ranked high, but their personal and business income taxes are high too, and when one drives on Idaho roads, one is left wondering “where the heck does all that tax money go?!”

There are other examples, but I could say with high certainty that I would not have ranked Idaho higher than Wyoming or Nevada. Idaho will also tax you if you’re a part-time resident; they will want a pro-rated portion of your income to be taxed according to how much time you spend in Idaho. Neither WY or NV required this.

They think that Wyoming has a high rate of personal taxation, but that’s because they have their heads up their posteriors. Wyoming has no personal or business income taxes. It *looks* like we have a high rate of taxation vs. personal income, because we have mineral severance taxes. Local counties don’t levy any income taxes, and fuel, real estate and sales taxes are generally low.

This is the danger of listening to liberal arts majors from back east or Ivy League schools about any of this stuff. They wouldn’t recognize a fact if it lept up and bit them in their pompous buttocks.

[NVDave]

I wouldn’t rank any state east of the Mississippi in the top 10, that’s for certain.

What these dweebs from back east don’t realize is that the percentage of government employees in many western states is mostly out of our hands where we have large BLM, USFS, BIA, NPS, etc employee numbers.

We didn’t ask for Yellowstone to employ so many federal employees. We didn’t ask for all the BIA employees, or the US Forest Service employees. Nevada didn’t ask for all the military employees located within their borders, and so on.

These idiots think that we western states have some say in this. We don’t. None, zippo, nada. We just have to put up with it.

[freeandfreezing]

How NH makes it to the top of the list when states like Wyoming have no business income taxation, no passive or dividend taxation, no interest taxation, low real estate taxes and many counties have no zoning... I have no idea.

That alone does seem like it should push Wyoming up to the top of the list.

[Gondring]

Don’t forget that many here believe that “conservatism” is “instituting big government when my guys are in, and then whining about it when they’re not.”

[Victoria_R]

There are other examples, but I could say with high certainty that I would not have ranked Idaho higher than Wyoming or Nevada. Idaho will also tax you if you’re a part-time resident; they will want a pro-rated portion of your income to be taxed according to how much time you spend in Idaho. Neither WY or NV required this.

The last I looked neither WY or NV had a state income tax.

Idaho has a state income tax and will tax non-residents on income earned while in Idaho (it's called "source income" and most states with state income tax do something similar unless they have a reciprocity agreement with another state (mostly Eastern U.S. states)). Part-year residents are taxed based on Idaho source income and/or a ratio of total income.

Anyway, Idaho does have a ridiculously steeply graded progressive income tax rate which leaves most people paying more state income tax to Idaho than they would in another state.

And, yes, the roads in Idaho are crummy. Planning is crummy. Maintenance is crummy. Road construction goes on FOREVER. No road in Idaho must be free of orange construction barrels! EVER! I hate the latest fad for roundabouts.

[kaylar]

Missouri’s 5th; our summers are humid scorchers but our winters are comparatively mild , at least compared to NH and SD. We also flunked the Brady Bunch’s “sensible gun laws” test a few weeks back , with a score of only +4 .:-) Worst (ie best) possible score is -4, so we have a bit of work, but at least we didn’t pass.

[Cuttnhorse]

You must be living near Circle?

I’m over the line in Dawson

[giotto]

Yeah! Way to go California! “We’re not last...we’re not last..” yeesh...

Thanks. Nothing like some gallows humor to brighten my morning.

[giotto]

....that this attempt to quantify liberty is by... “a LIBERTARIAN think tank”

And...?

[Aroostook25]

Libertarian think tank? Yes. See the report where they cite one of their favorite books
Anarchy, State, and Utopia by Robert Nozick

[Eska]

WE're in Eagle, downriver from you all.

Actually, I know a few people up in Dawson and the boy is working for queen over summer, home from UAF; he likes Dawson. I mostly know Indians from up there who have relatives down here. Big Mike, often stays over our place, and I know Chris Janus, and bunch of other ones from Mayo to Old Crow. One time Sarah Lee stopped at our house, I talked hockey with that girl for hours, ha.

I actually send up 500 lbs tatoes every sept with Big Mike and he gets them around.

You been in Dawson a long time?

[nkycincinnatikid]

Wellllll,,,,,
Libertarians
are not
liberians,
not lesbians,
not lactose interants,
in point of fact they are
libertarians
they propose that legalising freedom might actually work.
They accept the Scriptures to my knowledge, which is of course intolerable to “freedom lovers” today .
And they seem to to think that beyond that abusers of liberty,freedom will fail in a free society.
I can’t say if it will work,
I don’t think that it has ever been triedin fact.
MY freekin point was the poster posted a constuct of the opinion of libertarians and felt OBLIGATED to postscipt a caveat that they might actually believe what they profess to believe in.
IT WAS just NUTS.

[Mr. Silverback]

Just because it has liberty in the name doesn’t mean its aims lead to the most liberty. For example, the majority of libertarians are pro-aborts and that’s the official position of their party, but turning little kids into medical waste is murder, not liberty.

[callisto]

Bookmarking.

Thanks for the ping! This country is far down the slippery slope to losing our freedom.

[the OlLine Rebel]

This is absurd - MD was the WORST last year (or the year before; it may’ve been that long).

Harumph! What do you mean, WE’RE not worst?

BTW - how about the Enviro-mental fascist indoctrination in MD schools today? Maybe that doesn’t count as “freedom-sapping”; I just see it as indoctrination typical of fascio-commie states.