Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.Y. Marriage Bill Hits Snags on Religion Questions
Fox ^ | June 17, 2011 | Michael Gormley

Posted on 06/18/2011 10:57:27 PM PDT by lbryce

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - Gov. Andrew Cuomo said he was cautiously optimistic his gay marriage bill will soon become law as he held more one-on-one negotiations Friday with Senate Republicans. The Republicans who hold the critical votes say they worry Cuomo's bill doesn't adequately protect religious groups and churches that refuse to preside over same-sex weddings and other services.

A third lengthy, closed-door meeting by the GOP majority brought the bill, widely viewed as key to national momentum on the issue, no closer to a floor vote. The Democrat-led Assembly passed the measure Wednesday as expected, and a vote in the Senate had been anticipated this week.

That action could now be days away, after Senate Republicans didn't even discuss Friday whether to take that action.

"There has been no decision — in fact that really was not the discussion — as to whether it will come out yet, who's voting for it, who's voting against it," Majority Leader Dean Skelos said immediately after Friday's two-hour conference.

The Long Island Republican said senators for and against gay marriage want to make the sure that if the bill gets a floor vote there won't be "unintended consequences to this legislation" — a reference to religious protections.

Skelos didn't go into more details but noted that some Catholic adoption agencies closed after a law was passed years ago prohibiting discrimination against gays and lesbians.

Other Republicans have sought further protections of caterers and others who might object to providing services or a venue for a wedding of a same-sex couple. One proposal apparently not under serious discussion would protect individuals opposed to gay marriage from laws against discrimination.

(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxny.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: abomination; cuomo; gay; gayrights; homosexualagenda; soddomites
Flintstones. Meet the Flintstones.
They're the modern stone age family.
From the town of Bedrock,
They're a page right out of history.

Let's ride with the family down the street.
Through the courtesy of Fred's two feet.

When you're with the Flintstones
you'll have a yabba dabba doo time.
A dabba doo time.
You'll have a gay old time.

Fortunately for us, Bedrock is far, far away
happily we don't expect to have a gay old time in New York anytime soon.

1 posted on 06/18/2011 10:57:39 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Two men being married to one another. ROTFL!!! It still cracks me up every time I hear it. We’re not a nation of immigrants, we’re a nation of moronic jackasses.


2 posted on 06/18/2011 10:59:24 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When the going gets tough, the tough check themselves into "rehab".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Come on Republicans stand for something for a change. Have a backbone. Protect our families and our children and our society. If you think the homofacists will stop at marriage you better buy a clue!


3 posted on 06/18/2011 11:04:04 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
What gets lost much more so is the fact that marriage is the sanctification of the bond between a man and a woman for the purposes of procreation, to be fruitful and multiply.

Hence, the epithet against gays in the profligating of their seed is fruit.

4 posted on 06/18/2011 11:07:17 PM PDT by lbryce (BHO:Satan's Evil Twin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

>> AP: The Republicans who hold the critical votes say they worry ...

The Dems only need to peel off a couple of jackass Republicans to get the votes they ‘need’.

I believe they have the quoted “f___ it” RINO from upstate NY.


5 posted on 06/18/2011 11:10:26 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
CORRECTION:
Hence, the epithet against gays in the profligating of their seed being tagged as fruit, fruits, fruity-tootys, tooty-fruitys.
6 posted on 06/18/2011 11:11:17 PM PDT by lbryce (BHO:Satan's Evil Twin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

ping


7 posted on 06/18/2011 11:13:18 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

Last time this came up in NY state (under Dem Governor Patterson), it was DEMS that stopped it. Hispanic Dems wouldn’t support it, and other traditionally Dem groups (West Indies, West Africans and the like) were sickened by it. As odd as it may seem to have the Repubs determine how this proceeds, it is important to note they are NY Repubs (like MA Repubs, or NJ Repubs); they are only slightly to the right of Dems, and usually well left of center (otherwise there’d be no Repubs here).


8 posted on 06/18/2011 11:13:49 PM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
they worry Cuomo's bill doesn't adequately protect religious groups and churches that refuse to preside over same-sex weddings and other services.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought that churches could already refuse to marry a couple. My in-laws' pastor turned down my marriage to my husband because we didn't want to cooperate with the pre-marital counseling. My daughter's fiance's church won't marry them because she's not a Christian.

Can't pastors already refuse to marry a gay couple?

9 posted on 06/18/2011 11:35:09 PM PDT by Marie (Obama seems to think that Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since Camp David, not King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Two men being married to one another. ROTFL!!! It still cracks me up every time I hear it. We’re not a nation of immigrants, we’re a nation of moronic jackasses.

**********************

I hate to say it, but after knowing some women, I can kind of understand it... 8-\


10 posted on 06/18/2011 11:37:02 PM PDT by Marie (Obama seems to think that Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since Camp David, not King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marie
Can't pastors already refuse to marry a gay couple?

They can now, but the concern is that after this passed, if it does, they might not be able to in the future.

But I believe any such interpretation or intent would run afoul of the first amendment.. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . If they want to get "married" after the passage of the law, they could go to a justice of the peace for a civil ceremony or to a church/clergyman that doesn't object.

11 posted on 06/18/2011 11:59:48 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Realistically, even if Cuomo were to agree to accommodate ‘religious’ objections, to get his bill passed, it wouldn’t matter. The second the bill passed and some traditional church/synagogue/mosque refused to marry 2 gays, they’d be in court and find a friendly judge would would find the religious exemptions unconstitutional. They better stop it in the NYS Senate while they can.


12 posted on 06/19/2011 12:05:48 AM PDT by EDINVA ( CHANGE it back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

But, since homosexual activists are determined to force this through the courts, this will not be the end of it if this bill passes.

If this bill passes, it will simply move the goal posts for lawsuits against churches. Since churches don’t perform homosexual marriages, they will be sued for their refusal to do so. They will be sued because of claims of discrimination based on “sexual orientation”.

Churches have successfully been sued for racial discrimination, and lost tax exemptions because of that. Since the gay agenda equates discrimination against gays with racial discrimination, it’s not too much of a stretch to see courts siding with gays if they sue churches over gay marriage.

You might think this is far fetched. But just ask yourself — 15 years ago, would you have believed that gays would sue a dozen states over the definition of marriage, and succeed in forcing four of them to recognize homosexual marriage? Would you have believed that a parallel movement in Canada would have forced that entire nation to recognize gay marriage?

The activists are laying the groundwork to continue to force their agenda through the courts. The gay agenda is anathema to religion, and they see organized religion as one of their big enemies.


13 posted on 06/19/2011 12:08:12 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I see. Thank you.


14 posted on 06/19/2011 12:17:26 AM PDT by Marie (Obama seems to think that Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since Camp David, not King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Bingo. The church is their enemy.


15 posted on 06/19/2011 12:37:14 AM PDT by onona (I stand with SARAH !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

“They better stop it in the NYS Senate while they can.”

NY conservatives ought to tell Leader Dean Skelos not to allow it to go to the floor for a vote in the first place.


16 posted on 06/19/2011 1:58:29 AM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego; onona

Well said. I remember a story in the ME about a man marrying his donkey. Who knows what the future holds.


17 posted on 06/19/2011 2:59:23 AM PDT by bronxville (Sarah will be the first American female president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

If my NYS Senator (Lanza) votes yes he will be out of a job.


18 posted on 06/19/2011 4:40:30 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

Marie, I think what they’re talking about here are not just churches, but people in the wedding BUSINESS: catering halls, food services, photographers, bakeries, etc. This law gives them no protections from having to provide services to homosexuals who wish to “marry,” nor would it protect individuals who do not wish to acknowledge homosexual “marriage.”

Of course, it also means that public school children (which do not include my own, thank God) will be indoctrinated into learning that there is no difference between a homosexual “marriage” and a normal one.

Regards,


19 posted on 06/19/2011 4:49:24 AM PDT by VermiciousKnid (Sic narro nos totus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
...one-on-one negotiations Friday with Senate Republicans.

What a nice eupehemism for bribery.

20 posted on 06/19/2011 4:51:46 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
Come on Republicans stand for something for a change. Have a backbone. Protect our families and our children and our society. If you think the homofacists will stop at marriage you better buy a clue!

Well said. Please, send that plea to every RINO NY Senator with the same passionate voice.

21 posted on 06/19/2011 4:52:30 AM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
...euphemism...

Yes, Virginia, they can be bought.

22 posted on 06/19/2011 4:52:37 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Well, considering who’s doing the dealing, I should’ve said bribed and/or blackmailed. Hence the one-on-one...Just another reason why any RINO that votes for this should be out the door next election cycle.


23 posted on 06/19/2011 4:55:14 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I don’t want my government pretending that homosexuality is normal. It’s not normal; it’s never has been normal; and it never will be normal.


24 posted on 06/19/2011 5:24:18 AM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson