Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion Fight Heats up in Defense Budget Debate
ABC News ^ | June 16, 2011 | Huma Khan

Posted on 06/19/2011 12:18:25 AM PDT by lbryce

Jessica Kenyon was applying to become an officer in the Army and had just earned her spurs when she found out she was pregnant.

Little did the now 30-year-old realize that her military career would be short-lived. Kenyon, who was sexually assaulted by another servicemember, was denied an abortion at the military hospital in North Korea where she was stationed. Instead, she was told her only option would be to find a facility in Seoul or leave the country.

"You don't speak the language. You don't necessarily know how clean everything is, so you don't want to get sick," she recalls. At military bases, "they absolutely will not do it at all, no matter what, except for the health of the mother."

Under current law, only those women whose lives are endangered can get an abortion at military hospitals. Victims of rape and incest aren't entitled to federal funds for abortion services, even though other beneficiaries of government health care, like prisoners and Medicaid recipients, are.

Abortion rights supporters are hoping to capitalize on the ongoing defense budget debate to build momentum for a provision that would allow servicemembers who are victims of rape and incest to get an abortion at military hospitals.

A number of Senate Democrats, led by New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, will officially introduce the MARCH -- Military Access to Reproductive Care and Health -- Act today, following on the heels of a similar House bill that was announced last week.

The bills are likely to trigger another political fight on an issue that has become the battleground for conservatives in the current Congress. Last month, an effort by Rep. Susan Davis, D-Calif., to interject a similar amendment into the 2012 Defense Authorization

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 2012; abortion; aclu; davis; fairness; gillibrand; govtsanctionedmurder; infanticide; jessicakenyon; kirstengillibrand; march; military; murder; prolife; suedavis; susandavis
That's it. Just about ready to throw my hands up in exasperation, frustration, anger, reeling from the relentless destruction unleashed upon us by the left-wing jack-boots that comprise Satan's army. It's almost where you don't even know the score.
1 posted on 06/19/2011 12:18:32 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

We occupy North Korea?


2 posted on 06/19/2011 12:30:49 AM PDT by BinaryBoy (Stuck with a local RINO? Regardless of who you vote for, donate $$$ to a different district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I’m confused. Why is this so terrible? It looks like they’re only trying to get access to abortion for women who’ve been raped.

Physical health of the mother, rape and incest... That’s all.

(And why the heck is incest always thrown in there??)


3 posted on 06/19/2011 12:32:39 AM PDT by Marie (Obama seems to think that Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since Camp David, not King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

There was no mention of a prosecution of the man who raped her. It’s hard to take her claim as serious without that fact, and piling on rape stats confuses this whole article. Regardless, abortion stops a beating heart. I suppor the current policy - no fed funds for abortion.


4 posted on 06/19/2011 12:43:32 AM PDT by kdot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kdot

When a servicemember purposely assaults or rapes another servicemember, is the victim entitled to “civil” damages from the aggressor, or something akin to that under military code?


5 posted on 06/19/2011 12:47:41 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BinaryBoy

Agree, this article smells like a very ripe, road-killed skunk!


6 posted on 06/19/2011 1:00:58 AM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I’m sorry she was sexually assaulted, but killing her baby won’t make the rape go away.


7 posted on 06/19/2011 1:18:34 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

I’m curious about the wording, “sexually assaulted” vs. “raped”. Was this a case of actual rape, or is this a case of “she started out saying yes, but as his eyes crossed, she had second thoughts”? It makes a huge difference.


8 posted on 06/19/2011 2:13:12 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

When you report being raped, one of the things that occurs during the examination and gathering of evidence is that they are given a morning after pill that ensures no pregnancy.

What? She didn’t report being raped?

You know, Roe v Wade was over just such a bogus set of circumstances, and here we are, with nearly 100 million innocent souls crying out to God without ceasing for vengeance.


9 posted on 06/19/2011 3:01:28 AM PDT by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41
When you report being raped, one of the things that occurs during the examination and gathering of evidence is that they are given a morning after pill that ensures no pregnancy.

Uh oh! There you go, challenging their narrative. It has the odor of propaganda with the fascinating lack of specificity on their prop, Jessica Kenyon.

10 posted on 06/19/2011 3:39:00 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Help Jim DeMint: http://www.cutcapbalancepledge.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All; lbryce
Victims of rape and incest aren't entitled to federal funds for abortion services, even though other beneficiaries of government health care, like prisoners and Medicaid recipients, are.

Looks like a places to defund, thanks ABC!

11 posted on 06/19/2011 3:41:04 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Help Jim DeMint: http://www.cutcapbalancepledge.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; trebb
Evidently it was both.

"When I went to Korea, I was indecently assaulted by someone in my unit and later raped by someone in another unit," Jessica Kenyon, a former victim, told Press TV's U.S. Desk in a phone interview on Friday.

You made an excellent observation. Notice the ABC piece goes on to say "A Department of Defense report released last year showed that sexual assault in the military had risen ... There were more than 3,200 such reported cases in that fiscal year."

But that number, included to cause alarm, is for sexual assault which as you pointed out, and as the advocating prop, described is different from rape.

The pregnancy ended anyway:

Kenyon, who remembered herself as a gung-ho private hoping to advance through the ranks, said the incident led to her discharge, and she miscarried after flying back to the U.S.

This isn't reporting, it's agenda-driven propaganda.

12 posted on 06/19/2011 4:03:36 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Help Jim DeMint: http://www.cutcapbalancepledge.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
This isn't reporting, it's agenda-driven propaganda

It's a finely honed 'narrative' the MSM have crafted. Rape is bad so it justifies taxpayer funding of abortion. But, it works well in all their issues. For example if we oppose illegal aliens then the produce will rot in the fields, the price of food goes up and we all starve.

13 posted on 06/19/2011 4:48:59 AM PDT by Calusa (The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles. Quoth Bob Dylan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BinaryBoy

Didn’t you hear? Pyongyang Naval Station is some of the plushest duty in the US Navy.


14 posted on 06/19/2011 5:21:49 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trebb

He said her boobs were too small and it depressed her so she went out and consorted with a guy off base and got pregnant?


15 posted on 06/19/2011 5:24:15 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks lbryce.
Jessica Kenyon was applying to become an officer in the Army and had just earned her spurs when she found out she was pregnant... sexually assaulted by another servicemember, was denied an abortion at the military hospital in North Korea where she was stationed... At military bases, "they absolutely will not do it at all, no matter what, except for the health of the mother." Under current law, only those women whose lives are endangered can get an abortion at military hospitals. Victims of rape and incest aren't entitled to federal funds for abortion services, even though other beneficiaries of government health care, like prisoners and Medicaid recipients, are.
Wow, glad we've got troops stationed in North Korea. Next time those commie bastards start something, we'll be all over them like white is on rice.

The rest of this story sounds like it's some customized canned axe-grinding.


16 posted on 06/19/2011 5:25:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce
One problem with abortions at military hospitals that the article doesn't address is that there are very few doctors willing to perform abortions, even fewer in the military. There are very few military medical people willing to participate in an abortion and they are still protected via conscience clauses. The bottom line is that abortionists are largely viewed as the ‘garbage men’ of their profession recognized for little talent and even less integrity.
17 posted on 06/19/2011 5:39:31 AM PDT by MSF BU (YR'S Please Support our troops: JOIN THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

The baby shouldn’t be punished for the sins of the father. Kill the rapist and let the baby live.


18 posted on 06/19/2011 6:45:25 AM PDT by Brett11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; Elendur; it_ürür; Bockscar; Mary Kochan; Bed_Zeppelin; YellowRoseofTx; Rashputin; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


19 posted on 06/19/2011 6:49:02 AM PDT by narses ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Jessica then met up with Amina, the Syrian lesbian where they discusses Bush’s national Guard transcripts and ways to hide the decline in their climate report.


20 posted on 06/19/2011 7:23:24 AM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The article is tripe, for the most part. No matter whether the “author” of the “story” feels strongly enough to tilt their story or not, it misses a tremendous point. Abortion, even in the case of rape, is still, always, murder of a baby. That’s a life Our Lord gave to someone, in spite of any horrible crime preceding conception. I am glad that she was unsuccessful in her desire to have an abortion. I am also sorry about the miscarriage, even with her previous desire to murder her child.


21 posted on 06/19/2011 7:30:17 AM PDT by sayuncledave (A cruce salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

So you’re saying that it’s “not a big deal” that my money is used to impose the death penalty to an innocent baby just because his or her father is a rapist? I have no problem with my money being used to execute rapists after due process of law, but not to murder innocent babies for the sins of their fathers.

It is bad enough that killing innocent babies is legal, but pro-aborts want me to pay for it too?


22 posted on 06/19/2011 8:42:57 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marie

So you’re saying that it’s “not a big deal” that my money is used to impose the death penalty to an innocent baby just because his or her father is a rapist? I have no problem with my money being used to execute rapists after due process of law, but not to murder innocent babies for the sins of their fathers.

It is bad enough that killing innocent babies is legal, but pro-aborts want me to pay for it too?


23 posted on 06/19/2011 8:43:18 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson