Skip to comments.Agenda 21: The U.N.ís Earth Summit Has Its Head In The Clouds
Posted on 06/21/2011 7:18:45 PM PDT by george76
...We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Former Senator Timothy Wirth, representing the Clinton-Gore administration as undersecretary of state for global affairs, stated that public concern about global warming could be used to advance that cause: We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy. Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which has lobbied for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.
The global warming rubric has served as an ideal platform to enable the U.N. to advance large philosophical visions, wealth redistribution agendas, and world governance goals under the banner of environmentalism....
Former Soviet Union president Mikhail Gorbachev clearly recognized an opportunity to use climate alarmism to advance global socialistic Marxist objectives following the U.S.S.R.s economic and political collapse. In 1996 he observed: The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.
Saving the planet makes for a great cover story to conceal power and wealth redistribution that have no such laudable purpose as was witnessed at the 2009 Copenhagen Summit followed by Cancun in 2010. This organized movement really originated in the 1970s and early 1980s when Third World countries, by force of numbers, and European socialist green parties, through powers of aggressiveness, seized control of the U.N. and ...to obtain postcolonial reparations ...
Now, enter Sustainable Development Agenda 21 (or just Agenda 21).
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.forbes.com ...
They want between 90% and 99% of Earth’s human population to die off.
Look up “Turtle Island.”
It’s no joke, but people think it has to be.
Dave Foreman/Earth First is in on it and the UN backed it.
That's not where I think it has its head.
“They want between 90% and 99% of Earths human population to die off.”
There’s another thread talking about restrictive new food rules from FDA, CDC, USDA, and others.
Save the world...from the UN and the enviro-radicals.
“We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Former Senator Timothy Wirth, representing the Clinton-Gore administration as undersecretary of state for global affairs, stated that public concern about global warming could be used to advance that cause.”
Love you too, Wirth. I’d sooner split your head open with an ax than give you the time of day.
Students are taught in school that the greatest challenge they will ever face is global warming.
( ^8 }
Can you tell me the thread on food restrictions? This is of very interest to me..Thanks
sustainability..means whatever the United Nations ultimately decides is best for all of us
In the clouds? I think that they have their head in a much lower place.
You are welcome! Enjoy your Frosted Flakes while you can!
Please read post 57 of the thread you just gave me about the food and tell me what you think
The silver lining is that the commie libs will be the first ones to go. We’ve got all the guns and bullets!
A clearer view of the United Nations and its intentions.
The creation of the League of Nations was the first international attempt to start a New World Order. Since President Wilson wouldnt join, it failed. Then came along the United Nations which Alger Hiss, a charter member of the Council on Foreign Relations coaxed us to join in 1945.
World regionalism is spelled out clearly in the U.N. Charter, Chapters 8 through 11, using such terms as regional arrangements, intergovernmental agreements, and metropolital areas. Advocates of one-world socialism have already divided the world into 85 regions for policing purposes. In adopting the U.N. Charter, Congress has established the Charter as the Supreme Law of the land (Fugi v. State of California, 1950-52).
The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that days sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow. Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915
The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world. -M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)
If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands. Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World
... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people. H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)
The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial,
political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today
Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a League of Nations or a Federated Union to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World
Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the New International Order, The
New World Order, World Union Now, World Commonwealth of Nations, World Community, etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual. excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)
In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of justice and peace. -excerpt from article entitled New World Order Pledged to Jews, in the New York Times (October 1940)
“...We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.
This is the actual game plan of the both the left luddite globalists and the right warlord globalists and has been since Mary Shelley wrote “Frankenstein”. The banking and finance industry seems to be helping this right along with their death grip exercise in Hayeckian free enterprise. If heads don’t begin to roll soon, it’s game over and you Hal Lindsay Rapturians will get your Armageddon. Communities should start holding informal meetings about this.
At one time leftists called themselves humanists.
Now what are they?
So now they admit that global warming is a fraud, but demand that it still be fought.
Just a thought... is it possible that the massive new taxes and regulations required to fight global warming were what the fight was about all along?
Yes, I know that we've known this all along as well.