There was NOTHING in my post regarding mechanism or effectivity of the medicine itself. Nor was there any defense of anybody; It's pretty amazing that you can find "errors" in stuff that is only in your own imagination. Maybe you should try imagining truthful things -- I know that would be a stretch for you, but it would save you some time.
Of course you wont get into RISK BENEFIT issues
I never said I wouldn't get into anything; it never came up, and you certainly aren't going to talk about it.
However, HERE is the lead post of mine to a thread from 2009 where I attack Gardasil and argue Risk/Benefit in a way that might be helpful to you.
Of course you wont get into INFORMED CONSENT issues.
Again, I never said I wouldn't get into anything; that was the one thing of everything you posted for which you made a modicum of sense, so I didn't feel it was necessary to correct you.
However, Here is an FR thread post of mine where I come closest to defending Perry, noting that his proposal allowed parents to opt out without cause; in another post in that thread, I quote from a source which specifically discusses informed consent.
Unlike you, I actually have researched this issue, and published opinion pieces opposing mandatory Gardasil vaccinations, a fact you would know if you did even the tiniest bit of research rather than just spouting off ignorantly.
I'll close with this FR post from 2009, giving my reason why I wouldn't have my kids vaccinated:: "Because the risk can be almost entirely controlled, while the risk of the vaccine cannot be."
I think trying to use the Gardasil argument as a disqualifying one against Perry is stupid, given the actual facts of the matter. But I'm not going to defend him against these stupid attacks. I'm simply correcting your factually inaccurate, misleading, and incomplete statements. Which itself could be a full-time job.
Perry FORCED unneeded medicine on children
who did not need it. Period.
THAT is fascism.
THAT is the sign of the RINO.