Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS
That is all they can do and that can not overcome bad tax, spending and regulatory policies that the FED has no influence on.

...then why doesn't he publicly state that is the case and throw Obama under the bus?

39 posted on 06/22/2011 4:34:43 PM PDT by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Popman

“...then why doesn’t he publicly state that is the case and throw Obama under the bus?”

1. He does not want to undermine confidence in the economy any more than it Obama’s policies already have. Less confidence in the economy would only make things worse.

2. He does not want the independent FED to seem partisan. Also the economic illiterates of the Dim party would view any truthful statement about how harmful Obama’s spending, taxation and regulation are to the economy as the Chairman of the FED going partisan. It is pretty important in the future for the US to continue to have a non-partisan central bank. So I think for this reason Bernanke is smart to leave pointing out Obama’s economic ignorance to other political commentators and economists.

So Bernanke gains nothing by stating the obvious and elementary truth about Obama economic policies and he could do harm to the economy by doing so.


49 posted on 06/23/2011 11:25:38 PM PDT by JLS (How to turn a recession into a depression: elect a Dem president with a big majorities in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson