Posted on 06/23/2011 5:38:48 AM PDT by RobinMasters
The typography expert who played a key role in ending the career of CBS News anchor Dan Rather has told WND he has strong suspicions the Obama birth certificate released by the White House is fraudulent.
Joseph M. Newcomer, who exposed the "Killian documents" as fraudulent in 2004, has told WND the Obama birth certificate released by the White House April 27 is a "highly suspicious" document that deserves professional forensic examination.
"There is something deeply wrong here," Newcomer told WND. "There are artifacts in the birth certificate document that are strongly suggestive of a forgery. The document screams out that something is wrong."
Newcomer's 7,000-word analysis of the Killian documents in the Rather case demonstrated that the purported memos regarding George W. Bush's experience in the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam War were produced on a modern computer word processor, not a 1970s-era manual typewriter.
Newcomer stressed that he was relying on published charges that the Obama birth certificate was fraudulent, including the analysis by scanner expert Doug Vogt and by typography expert Paul Irey.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Kenyan.
Paging Dr. Ukulele.
Gee. I thought it was the FREEPER BUCKHEAD who discovered that.
Buckhead isn’t a Truther like Corsi, so Corsi doesn’t trust him.
Me thinks it will be some time before this goes away.
What we need is a Congress that will impeach and prosecute.
Fat chance. I am beginning to think that the current administration knows that the GOP used their once-in-a-lifetime chance to impeach Slick Willy. No way would the Dems let the GOP impeach the next Dem president without even more demagoguery than before. Also, the Dems will never vote for prosecution it in the Senate. So, O is free to do whatever he wants, because the Dems will have O's back.
The only way O gets impeached is if the Dems call for it.
“What we need is a Congress that will impeach and prosecute”
What we need is a grand jury that knows the law...
The rights of the People are secured against tyranny by the judicial power of the grand jury. A grand jury that truly possesses the judicial power emanating from the People will act in harmony with the following rules from the Corpus Juris Secundum Vol. 38:
The grand jury is of ancient origin.
The grand jury is summoned to serve the court.
The grand jury is an arm of the court, but is not the court itself.
The grand jury is under the general supervision and control of the court, at least “to the extent that it is organized.” 38 C.J.S. Grand Juries, Section 1, p. 981, note 26.
The grand jury is not under the control of the court to the same extent as the petit jury.
“It is generally conceded that, after it is duly organized, the larger part of its functions is to be performed by it as a separate and independent body acting apart from the court.” Ibid., p. 981, note 34.
“It must act free from influence, fear, favor, affection, reward, or hope thereof, preceding from, or without the court.” U.S. v. Olmstead, D.C. Wash. 7 F.2nd 758[2].
Some cases hold that the grand jury is independent of the court and is separate, distinct and “may act independently of the court.” Ibid. Notes 35-413, p. 981, 982.
The grand jury is usually officered by a foreman. Ibid., p. 1009
The foreman is the presiding officer of the inquest. Ibid., p. 1010 note 74.
“The ordinary conception of the powers and duties of a grand jury is to guard the rights and liberties of the people, in the preservation of morals and social order.” Ibid., p. 1027, note 79.
The court cannot limit the grand jury in its legitimate investigation. Ibid., p. 1028, note 95.
“Members of the grand jury may bring to the attention of their members any crimes known to any of them even though no complaint is presented by any prosecuting officer.” Ibid., p. 1028, note 98.
It is the duty of the grand jury to inquire into all offenses within its jurisdiction. Ibid., p. 1029, note 5.
It cannot be a blanket inquiry to bring to light supposed grievances for the purpose of criticizing an officer or department of the government. Ibid., p. 1030, note 21.
“...a grand jury has plenary inquisitorial powers, without any instruction or authority from the court, and may, on its own motion, originate charges against offenders, regardless of how the information on which it acts is brought to its attention. Ibid., p. 1031, note 35.
“...It is empowered to institute and initiate, as well as to manage and control, such investigation, without any interference or hindrance from the court or prosecuting attorney.” Ibid., p. 1032, note 37, 38.
The manner of conducting a hearing before a grand jury depends in a large measure on the good judgment of the grand jury. Ibid., p. 1037, note 96.
It is improper for the prosecuting attorney to participate in the deliberations of the grand jury, to express opinions on questions of fact, or as to the weight and sufficiency of evidence, make arguments, or in any way influence or direct the grand jury in its findings. Ibid., p. 1042, notes 91-96.
The grand jury cannot appoint its own attorney to supplant the advice and council of the prosecuting attorney, but an attorney may be summoned to appear before the grand jury in the capacity as an expert witness(es). Ibid., p. 1046, note 26, 27.
A stenographer can be present and take down testimony and information. Ibid., p. 1046-47.
The grand jury can call witnesses before it. Ibid., p. 1049.
Grand juries are protected in the discharge of their duties during the whole of their proceedings. Ibid., p. 1065, notes 60, 61.
This guy proves the thing is a fake and shows how it was crudely done and shows how you can find the same proơf in a few minutes if you have Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Illustrator.
freebird5850 wrote:
What we need is a Congress that will impeach and prosecute.
That won't solve the underlying problems. We have two serious problems that put Obama in office.
First, the media refused to bring his obvious faults to light. They were the propaganda arm of his campaign, and since he was elected, they have been the propaganda arm of his regime, and of the Democrat party.
Also, the public voted for someone was associated with well known socialist revolutionaries and who told us he wanted to "Fundamentally change" our country into a socialist utopia. It was no secret that he wanted to "redistribute the wealth" and he regularly talked about "green jobs" and other pie in the sky. Still, what? About 52% of the people in this country voted for the guy? Even if it wasn't him (because of the Birth Certificate issue), they'll still vote for a socialist who will take from "the rich" and give it to them. That's the fundamental problem. A majority of the people in this country want the security of slavery, not the challenges of freedom. Removing Obama doesn't fix that.
AND, holding your node and voting for Obama Lite (R) does nothing to fix that either. It just masks the symptoms and prolongs the disease.
“holding your node “
Now,,,, that’s a funny typo Mike! 8^)
I agree with your post. I just want to say a couple of things. First, Rush, Sean, Levin, and a few others, with all of their millions of listeners, If instead of being chicken shits, and talking about the fact that the ineligible fraud in the white house released a forged gov’t document and is and has committed Social Security fraud with a CT base SSN, they could have put an end to this after the first year. But with their silence, they have allowed this fraud to usurp this Republic. I put a lot of blame on them for not covering this story. The OBL story was a diversion, libya was a diversion and weiner was a diversion.
Joseph Newcomer is a genius level expert in computer typography, having written one of the earliest drivers for high resolution computer printing. His resume is here: http://www.flounder.com/resume.htm
I believe his post on his website, flounder.com, on the Rathergate documents was the first comprehensive technical analysis, and it was conclusive and devastating.
Faux News is owned by a Saudi prince. What do you expect?
I blame every single member of congress and every commissioned officer serving on or after Jan 20th, 2009. They all failed their sworn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.
“....that are suggestive of a forgery....”
Suggestive?
Good grief, only liberals are stupid enough to not see the hundreds of clues there.
That joke of a document was created by the same “talents” that created our current economic disasters.
The West Wing Clown Show of felon/cretins is still winning, however...due to the fact that our MSM is even lower on the intelligence ladder.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.