L
Another possible case where no matter who the winner is, the west “does not have a dog in that race”.
This is all about consolidating the caliphate community organizers recent gains in Egypt and giving capital assets and cash flow to the upcoming MB next door in Egypt. I believe this is phase one on their march against democracy. Obama has placed the whole mid east on a new war trajectory guaranteeing a assault on Israel and then the west, probably within his term for a purpose.
This crap is all orchestrated by the caliphate community organizer, to America’s detriment.
On the other hand, given the nation in which the investigating outfits are domiciled, France, and given the political mindset of the majority people there, particularly in the political class (Marxist/Socialist), it may be a case of them simply not finding many “fellow travelers” among the Libyan rebels.
I don’t know that for sure. They could be totally right about the strength of fundamentalists among the rebels. I simply question the political independence of the “independent” outfits that did the investigation.
L
This is the most unjustified war I can remember in modern times. It is a rape.
A bunch of guys got together and said, “Hey, I've got an idea. Let's all go and take Libya's oil.” And they did.
“He's going to kill everybody! everybody!!” was the stupid ‘justification’. Instead, NATO has killed thousands, if not tens of thousands of civilians in order to ‘protect’ them.
Not a big Kadaffy fan by any means, but this is an international mugging, and Obama is such a dumbass, he got us involved in it to support his MB brothers.
Duh, ya think? It took a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys to finally admit the truth about this?
Who couldn’t figure out that once Barry the Mooslim it be known that he wouldn’t resist a violent takeover by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt that the whole ME would blow up? Half the reason the price of oil is so high is because the Saudis are ticked off at Barry for not helping keep people they liked in power. Sure, the Saudis want Muslim states to replace secular ones, but no way they want Al Qaeda and/or Muslim Brotherhood backed groups running other countries since both groups have sworn to topple the Saudi royals.
And so, what say you, John Effing McCain???
From the start of this illegal, murderous operation for which no implication to our national security exists, I’ve taken the side of Khaddafi. He’s a thug with a history of supporting terror, but he was long ago deemed to be no longer a threat, and had reached out to the West, especially in the form of giving up his WMD program on the heels of the U.S. invasion of Iraq. He’d also given the U.S. a good deal of intel about al-Qaeda in Libya.
Plus... IT’S NOT OUR FIGHT!!!
Yet... here we are.. the dear reader seems to sense a political boost to assassinating Khaddafi him (and let’s not pretend that’s not the goal here).
Wasn’t all that “Bush Lied” crap about Iraq going to usher in a higher level of accountability as pertains to attacking a sovereign country? Even with our compliant and complicit press, Obama is getting quite a pass on this.
Trying to lump the monarchists in with the islamists is wrong. Monarchy is a strong force against the Islamists and a restoration of a pro-American monarchy would be a great victory for the USA and for Israel.
Al-Qaeda is against NATO intervention because they know it will ensure that whatever government replaces Kadaffy will be controlled by NATO and the USA.