[hal ogen]

I believe nobama is comparable to an empty sack.

[LibLieSlayer]

obama has no sack and has nothing to put into one even if he did.

LLS

[Huaynero]

An empty sack? Not at all, empirical evidence indicates hims be a “blivet.”

[golux]

Did anyone ever seriously compare Hussein Obama to Lincoln or Roosevelt?

I am a fan of neither, so it would be charming to hear those comparisons.

Chance the Gardener was not clueless. I believe that is one of the peculiar truths about his character in THE GREAT Jerzy Kosinski’s phenomenal script (which I was thrilled to discuss with he and Eric Bogosian many years ago.)

(This is one of the finest movies ever made, by the way.)

What Chance is, is honest and pure. Chance wins, and is trusted, because he is completely innocent, faithful, and devoid of subterfuge. He is truly Christ-like.

Obama is profoundly unlike Chauncy in almost every way:

Barone does not know what he’s talking about.

[Liz]

Chance Gardner watches TV and repeats phrases he hears--the sap-happy
liberal types around him mistake his non-sequiturs for political profundity.

Obama is Chance Gardner without the homburg.

[RipSawyer]

“I believe nobama is comparable to an empty sack.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

You vastly overrate him, an empty sack is ready to serve a purpose as soon as someone fills it.