Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why is Freerepublic.com blocked @ some US Military Installations?!
27 June 2011 | US Navy Vet

Posted on 06/27/2011 2:27:05 PM PDT by US Navy Vet

I got this e-mail for where I work regarding Blocking of Freerepublic: From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 8:14 AM To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Subject: Freerepublic.com

XX. XXXXXXX:

As per our telephone conversation, I cannot provide access to Freerepublic.com. One of analysis tools we utilize to perform checks of sites indicated FR had been or is currently hosting malicious software or serving as an intermediary to domains hosting malicious software. As I stated on the telephone, this does not mean the site is currently hosting anything malicious or serving as an intermediary for malicious sites; rather, it has done so in the past.

Thank you,


TOPICS: Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: fr; freerepublic; usgovernment; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Interesting, censorship perhaps?!
1 posted on 06/27/2011 2:27:12 PM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

The nerd(s) in charge of the firewall configuration are leftist twits?


2 posted on 06/27/2011 2:29:33 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
..serving as an intermediary to domains hosting malicious software.

This part kicks a lot of sites out of workplaces via firewall. Simply put, all links out of a site are scanned and if they link to a site that has malware on it, bam, it goes on a block list. Every link someone adds to this site increases the chance of that. I'm thinking, for example, about all the Examiner.com blog links. That site is so full of malware and tracking software it isn't even funny.

3 posted on 06/27/2011 2:29:57 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

If it’s been related to malware, sometimes those are blocked IP address range, which invariably catches innocent sites at the same hosting service. Otherwise, many products block sites that contain blogs or discussion groups.


4 posted on 06/27/2011 2:30:46 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce

“The nerd(s) in charge of the firewall configuration are leftist twits”?

...bingo!


5 posted on 06/27/2011 2:31:16 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Are the DUmmies blocked, too?


6 posted on 06/27/2011 2:31:22 PM PDT by MeganC (NO WAR FOR OIL! ........except when a Democrat's in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

because this site has no kiddie porn?


7 posted on 06/27/2011 2:32:06 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

When I was a contractor to the Air Force they simply said that the site had chat or bulletin board posting capabilities and was therefore a restricted site.


8 posted on 06/27/2011 2:32:06 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
..serving as an intermediary to domains hosting malicious software.

Must be the DUFU threads.

9 posted on 06/27/2011 2:32:36 PM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Navy Marine Corps Internet (NMCI) doesn’t block FR.


10 posted on 06/27/2011 2:34:03 PM PDT by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet; Jim Robinson; John Robinson; All
Hey, Jim...
Ya might wanna take a look at this......
FR supports our military.......
I'm pretty sure there ain't no malicious code either.....
11 posted on 06/27/2011 2:35:13 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
I've never gotten any malware from FR.
12 posted on 06/27/2011 2:35:25 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man
When I was a contractor to the Air Force they simply said that the site had chat or bulletin board posting capabilities and was therefore a restricted site.

I'm currently an Air Force contractor and I recall it being blocked for a very brief period of time back around 1995 or so, then allowed to return without posting capabilities. Now, at least where I work, there are both reading and posting access. It's hard to see why they would block it now, given the wide-open access to YouTube and social networking sites.

13 posted on 06/27/2011 2:35:59 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Years ago when I worked for the Army FR was blocked as “firearms/criminal enterprise”...


14 posted on 06/27/2011 2:37:50 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Free Republic is completely against the indoctrination of homo’s into our armed forces.

Perhaps this is a reason?


15 posted on 06/27/2011 2:38:52 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I'm a Birther - And a Deather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Because Freerepublic.com is not the Huffington Post or the like. /s =.=


16 posted on 06/27/2011 2:39:05 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Because biological and chemical warfare is posted on the weekly Gardening Thread.


17 posted on 06/27/2011 2:41:02 PM PDT by WestwardHo (Whom the gods would destroy, they first drive mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Free Republic is completely against the indoctrination of homo’s into our armed forces.

It's also sometimes fairly emphatic in its criticism of the Commander in Chief and the First Lady. I know it doesn't happen that often, but...

18 posted on 06/27/2011 2:41:09 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Very interesting that a site that did not exist could be blocked.


19 posted on 06/27/2011 2:41:37 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (I'm a Birther - And a Deather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
I've never had a problem accessing FR from military bases overseas, except for very briefly in '07 when Bill O'Reilly made a bunch of noise about FR being racist.

The DoD blocked access for a day or two, but enough of us requested explanations that they restored it.

20 posted on 06/27/2011 2:43:16 PM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson