Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA Warns House Bill Would 'Overturn' Clean Water Law
New York Times ^ | 6/23/11 | Paul Quillian

Posted on 06/27/2011 3:23:26 PM PDT by EBH

U.S. EPA warned of the potential dire consequences of legislation being fast-tracked through the House that would give states final say on rules concerning water, wetlands and mountaintop-removal mining.

In a four-page legal analysis (pdf), EPA said the measure (H.R. 2018 (pdf)) sponsored by House Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman John Mica (R-Fla.) and ranking member Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) "would overturn almost 40 years of federal legislation by preventing EPA from protecting public health and water quality."

GOP House leaders expect to bring the bill to a floor vote this summer.

EPA said the Mica-Rahall bill would "significantly undermine" the agency's role of overseeing states' establishment and enforcement of water pollution limits and permits. It said the measure would hinder EPA's ability to intervene on behalf of downstream states harmed by pollution coming from a state upstream. And it said the bill would prevent EPA from protecting local communities from ill-conceived mountaintop-removal and similar projects allowed to go forward under Army Corps of Engineers-issued permits.

"This would fundamentally disrupt the balance established by the original [Clean Water Act] in 1972 -- a law that carefully constructed complementary roles for EPA, the Corps, and states," the analysis said.

...At its core, the bill would prevent EPA from reversing or overruling previously issued approval of state water quality limits, permitting authority, or permits to dredge and fill waterways or wetlands.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: defundepa; democrats; envirofascism; environazis; epa; epabrownshirts; liberalfascism; liberals; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
The bill would remove the Federal Government as the end all be all of playing ...who know's best!
1 posted on 06/27/2011 3:23:32 PM PDT by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EBH

EPA should’ve been thinking of this when they started getting anal.


2 posted on 06/27/2011 3:25:33 PM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Greetings EBH:

Who would notice? Every state as an EPA, and the waterways between states already fall under USCG jurisdiction.

Cheers,
OLA


3 posted on 06/27/2011 3:27:40 PM PDT by OneLoyalAmerican (In God I trust, all others provide citations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Werks fer me.

git er done.


4 posted on 06/27/2011 3:28:06 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
"This would fundamentally disrupt the balance established by the original [Clean Water Act] in 1972

Balance??????? Haven't seen much of that.

5 posted on 06/27/2011 3:28:13 PM PDT by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Go for it!

Since they can’t play nice...defang ‘em.


6 posted on 06/27/2011 3:29:15 PM PDT by Adder (Say NO to the O in 2 oh 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

If I had my way, there would be two jobs for any EPA employee. The first job, for the ‘star’ performers would be to sort out plastics, paper, aluminum cans, etc from the trash at the countless land fills in this country. For the upper management, they would be sifting through the effluent from the countless waste water treatment plants and plucking the used prophylactics and other sanitary products from the treatment flow. That’s all they’re good for.


7 posted on 06/27/2011 3:29:21 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Keep it warm for 2012. Obama will veto of course, but the incoming Republican better sign it.


8 posted on 06/27/2011 3:33:09 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

De-fund that bunch of power crazed Lefties pushing EPA Nazi Edict and sell off ,that agency’s property while you are at it.


9 posted on 06/27/2011 3:33:28 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

YES! About time for this and many more like it.


10 posted on 06/27/2011 3:33:32 PM PDT by Pat4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

We just took a major hit in our jurisdiction from the EPA at a regional water level.


11 posted on 06/27/2011 3:33:43 PM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EBH
"would overturn almost 40 years of federal legislation by preventing EPA from protecting public health and water quality."

Why do you say that like its a bad thing?

12 posted on 06/27/2011 3:35:27 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Nothing in the bill overturns, prevents or eliminates any of EPA's traditional authorities or roles -- the bill simply restores the historic balance between the EPA and states under the Clean Water Act."

But it MAY stop the EPA from taking control of every molecule of water on, in or under the ground.

13 posted on 06/27/2011 3:35:37 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

EPA budget cuts put states in bind
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/environment/epa-budget-cuts-put-states-in-bind/2011/06/08/AGbVpYdH_story.html


14 posted on 06/27/2011 3:36:16 PM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EBH

First executive order of any incoming Republican President - dismantle the EPA.

Its constitutional authority is questionable to begin with, and they have arrogated power to themselves that is far in excess of what any regulatory agency should possess.

The free market is entirely and eminently well equipped, and has sufficient motive, to provide for the environment all by itself, thank you, and needs no staff of bureaucrats to stand over and dictate policy, which can change with the whim of one pressure group or another.

EPA should go, if for no other reason than they have declared carbon dioxide to be a “pollutant”, an example of spectacularly bad “scientific” reasoning.


15 posted on 06/27/2011 3:36:19 PM PDT by alloysteel ("Devastate your rivals, take no prisoners, smash mouths, glare meaningfully.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

EPA should be disbanded. The bill is a start in the right direction.


16 posted on 06/27/2011 3:40:34 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
bill would "significantly undermine" the agency's role

GOOD! It's about time!! The EPA has become zero's own rogue agency!

17 posted on 06/27/2011 3:41:50 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

This just amounts to delegating authority. The states are just as stupid as the EPA and the Feds will find another way to git ya.


18 posted on 06/27/2011 3:43:51 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Can't the epa proclaim any law passed by Congress null and void if they feel it might bring harm to gaia?
19 posted on 06/27/2011 3:44:18 PM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

EPA budget cuts put states in bind
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/environment/epa-budget-cuts-put-states-in-bind/2011/06/08/AGbVpYdH_story.html

Unreal, thanks for the link.


20 posted on 06/27/2011 3:45:40 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson