Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unprotected Sex More Likely in Serious Gay Relationships, Research Suggests
http://www.sciencedaily.com ^ | June 1, 2011 | Northwestern University

Posted on 06/28/2011 9:27:44 AM PDT by Maelstorm

ScienceDaily (June 1, 2011) — Gay young men in serious relationships are six times more likely to have unprotected sex than those who hook up with casual partners, according to new Northwestern Medicine research.

The findings provide a new direction for prevention efforts in this population who account for nearly 70 percent of all new HIV/AIDS diagnoses in adolescents and young adults in the United States and who also have the highest increase in new infections.

"Being in a serious relationship provides a number of mental and physical health benefits, but it also increases behaviors that put you at risk for HIV transmission," said Brian Mustanski, associate professor in medical social sciences at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and lead author of a paper on the research, published online in the journal Health Psychology. "Men who believe a relationship is serious mistakenly think they don't need to protect themselves."

About 80 percent of gay young men who are HIV positive don't know it, because they aren't being tested frequently enough, he noted. "It isn't enough to ask your partner his HIV status," Mustanski said. "Instead, both people in a serious, monogamous couple relationship should go and receive at least two HIV tests before deciding to stop using condoms."

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; gay; hiv; homosexualagenda; kills; marriage; moralabsolutes; std
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last
This is interesting. Gay men especially have never been know for their monagamy and those who compare the behavior to heterosexuals just don't understand the scope of difference. We've been told that if only they could marry it would fix things. All the disproportionate drug use, sex abuse, and suicide would disappear and now they encourage young kids to be "out and proud" which increases dramatically their chances of contracting serious and sometimes deadly STDs and for what to push forward what is just a myth.

No one is born gay, there is not one study showing that is the case and even though twin studies have shown the opposite we still have the lie repeated over and over again as if it is truth when it is not. And while no one is born gay they can certainly die that way and having our heads in the sand won't save anyone from that fate.

1 posted on 06/28/2011 9:27:51 AM PDT by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I never believed anyone was born a homosexual.

I always thought that to allow someone to be born that way, and then condemn the practice would be rather sadistic on the part of God.


2 posted on 06/28/2011 9:32:21 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
I never believed anyone was born a homosexual. I always thought that to allow someone to be born that way, and then condemn the practice would be rather sadistic on the part of God.

Well, looking at all the natural catastrophes, diseases like small pox etc., congenital birth defects etc., and other maladies afflicting Man, I'd kinda have to say that God is sadistic.

Regards,

3 posted on 06/28/2011 9:35:20 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Given that gay men have many times more sexual partners than heterosexual men, for every gay man who believe he is in a “serious, long-term” relationships, it usually turns out that their “partners” are not.


4 posted on 06/28/2011 9:36:27 AM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Homosexuals are notorious for participating in F__K trains which almost always involve multiple partners in one night.

Then they have the nerve to demand government money spent on research for AIDS.

I have worked with more than a few gays who have admitted that they engaged in this activity.


5 posted on 06/28/2011 9:38:54 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Is one born heterosexual?


6 posted on 06/28/2011 9:39:50 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

No joke. If you dare, take a look at bareback dot com. Hint: it is not for heteros.


7 posted on 06/28/2011 9:39:50 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

I once told somebody that HIV was more likely in gay men...the conversation started with DADT...some Navy ships create their own emergency blood supply with donations from the crew...and a gay crew puts the blood supply at risk. I had CDC numbers to back me up.

Response: Your CDC numbers are outdated. Ah - the liberal mind - historical data can be ‘outdated’.

On a side note, I actually believe some people are born gay, or at least intrinsically gay (i.e. not just acting gay to get attention, get back at the parents, etc.). However, the fact that you are ‘born gay’ does not make it correct, or normal. If you are born with 9 toes, or some crippling condition, it is not considered ‘normal’. If you grow up to be a psychopathic serial killer...you have a mental disease...and it is not ‘tolerated’. Homosexuality used to be considered a ‘mental disorder’...I think until the 1980’s. So I say yes, you can be born that way....but don’t fall into the trap of conceding that this standard (if proven) means gays are normal...somebody finds two male dogs humping each other, and they declare ‘its natural’, under that standard.


8 posted on 06/28/2011 9:44:22 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Time for the Ballad of Ben Gay - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05Hl8FVYLjA


9 posted on 06/28/2011 9:45:07 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Ummmm, AIDS is like a bad cold - it's devolved... That said you win the lottery when you get HIV - the prize? A LIFETIME of full Social Security benefits - no questions asked - for as long as you live... starting at 30 collecting until 90 years old... Yep, it'll break the system for those who really are disabled.

It's called 'Disability' and it's the newest best Dem scam ...

ONE in nineteen Americans are NOW considered disabled... gang-bangers, drug addicts, HIV winners, alcoholics, people with bad tempers ... YOU ARE PAYING FOR THEM TO BANKRUPT Social Security.

10 posted on 06/28/2011 9:45:19 AM PDT by GOPJ (1 in 19 collect SS disability- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2650736/posts?page=131#131)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

And that is exactly the problem. I know we shouldn’t speak of it.


11 posted on 06/28/2011 9:47:32 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Better to keep your enemy in your sights than in your camp expecting him to guard your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
"Instead, both people in a serious, monogamous couple relationship should go and receive at least two HIV tests before deciding to stop using condoms."

Otherwise a baby might grow in their tummy.

12 posted on 06/28/2011 9:49:15 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

As soon as they find a “gay gene” it will be interesting to see the liberals change their view on abortion.


13 posted on 06/28/2011 9:50:13 AM PDT by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Of course people in "serious relationships" are less likely to use protection during sex; that's likely true for everyone.

The factor that makes this different for "gay males" is, stated further down in the report:

"About 80 percent of gay young men who are HIV positive don't know it, because they aren't being tested frequently enough, he noted."

It's like living in a "village" where (a) you a now an "epidemic" is raging, (b) you know it is spread by person-to-person contact, (c) you know you can find out if you or someone else is already infected and (d) both of you choose to not find out before starting a "serious relationship".

Had those in the "serious relationship" bothered to take simple blood tests, the issue of "unprotected sex" would not have the level of concern the article gives it. It has that level primarily due to the lack of concern about blood tests that precedes too many "serious relationships" in the "village" in question.

14 posted on 06/28/2011 9:50:22 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Ah, but, a “Lady Gaga” (whatever that is), sings a song “Born This Way”. See the debate is over about homosexuality. Even though we don’t really know for sure what causes homosexuality, the liberals, Hollywood idiots, MSM talking heads, etc. have declared that discussion to be over. The debate is over to paraphrase Al Gore.


15 posted on 06/28/2011 9:51:17 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

“The findings provide a new direction for prevention efforts in this population who account for nearly 70 percent of all new HIV/AIDS diagnoses in adolescents and young adults in the United States and who also have the highest increase in new infections.”

I know that I am redundant when I am saying this, but the 70 percent figure is pretty sick when you consider how minute of a fraction homosexuality is out of the population as a whole(1 or 2 percent).”


16 posted on 06/28/2011 9:53:29 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

“Theodicy For Dummies” placemarker.


17 posted on 06/28/2011 9:53:57 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

I once told somebody that HIV was more likely in gay men...the conversation started with DADT...some Navy ships create their own emergency blood supply with donations from the crew...and a gay crew puts the blood supply at risk. I had CDC numbers to back me up.

That’s probably among the main reason for why they bothered with not allowing overt or open homosexuality in the military, they didn’t want to be responsible for a bad blood transfusion to someone else.


18 posted on 06/28/2011 9:58:39 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Unprotected Sex More Likely in Serious Gay Hetero Relationships, Research Suggests.

If you define serious as married and monogamous.

19 posted on 06/28/2011 9:58:45 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Do transgender,benders have special ‘’rights’’ that heterosexuals don't have? If so, what are they and when did they become part of the constitution
20 posted on 06/28/2011 10:00:33 AM PDT by shadeaud (" If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Gay young men in serious relationships are six times more likely to have unprotected sex than those who hook up with casual partners,

Uh. . . wouldn't the same obviously be true for straight men (and women) too?

21 posted on 06/28/2011 10:01:04 AM PDT by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

If only they were allowed to marry, AIDS would become a thing of the past...and now, I shall go feed my unicorns.


22 posted on 06/28/2011 10:03:15 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Your god may be a sadist. My God is not the author of that.


23 posted on 06/28/2011 10:04:56 AM PDT by DonkeyBonker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
I always thought that to allow someone to be born that way, and then condemn the practice would be rather sadistic on the part of God.

I don't for a minute believe that someone is born queer. If queers are strongly drawn to same sex passions, it's because of choices they have made or circumstances they have been forced into at some point in their lives and even at that they still can choose to subdue their passions.

Take Priests for example who subscribe to a celibate life and regardless of all the sex scandals about Priests posted at F.R., I believe the great majority of them are celibate. (I'm not Catholic).

Yes, it's unnatural to subdue sexual urges but God demands that we go along with His rules. He is a just God and he is sovereign, that means that He and He alone makes the rules, whether we think they are "fair" or not.

24 posted on 06/28/2011 10:08:20 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

BREAKING NEWS - Water is wet.


25 posted on 06/28/2011 10:15:20 AM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

With all we’ve learned about HIV/AIDS over the last 30 years, there is NO excuse for any homosexual man to get the disease today. If they are not protecting themselves, they have no one but themselves to blame, anymore.


26 posted on 06/28/2011 10:24:38 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

They don’t start that way, but they get sucked into it.


27 posted on 06/28/2011 10:28:44 AM PDT by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
“Theodicy For Dummies” placemarker.

How witty!

Thanks for clearing up that little misunderstanding that philosphers from Leibniz onwards have been grappling with.

For your information, some of the best minds of Western Civilization have been confounded by the so-called "Problem of Evil."

Regards,

28 posted on 06/28/2011 10:34:38 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

“Serious” means only 1 other outside partner a week. Unless the “serious” partner knows about it, and then it’s unlimited.


29 posted on 06/28/2011 10:41:14 AM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

“I once told somebody that HIV was more likely in gay men . . .”

In the early ‘80s, HIV hit gay men exclusively, then drug-users. In order to “humanize” the disease and assure the cash for its research, it had to become less exclusively a gay disease. With some overly sympathetic “reporting” and overblown claims (”women are as likely to contract this disease as men;” “HIV isn’t a behavioral problem, it’s an epidemic [like measles]”)along with congressional support, HIV/AIDS became a protected species. Not only was mandatory AIDS-testing and quarantining of likely groups outlawed, most venereal disease testing (as in pre-marriage licensing) ceased as well. All this to deny that behavior had anything whatsoever to do with the disease and to allow those bent on continuing that behavior the freedom to spread it. Still amazes me . . . cigarettes are baaaad, but homosexuality’s okay.

I understand, I think, what you mean by “born gay.” It’s not so much born gay, as born with, as you say, a disorder (homosexuality was indeed diagnosed as a psychosis by the APA until the outbreak of AIDS). The psychosis, as I read it years ago, was a proclivity based on a number of weaknesses or lack of coping skills that COULD, but not necessarily, lead to homosexuality. Homosexuality was simply the full indulgence of the proclivity—as kleptomania would be the full indulgence of a proclivity towards greed, or murder the full indulgence of envy or anger. And, as so much was explained by Freud, it was mother-relationship caused.

But of course none of this served the gay community who needed not just “permission” to continue unnatural activity (freedom from sodomy laws, say) but recognition that such behavior was an unalienable right—not a fault, not a disorder or disease, but a valid, heretofore denied lifestyle choice! And our wise congress chose to give them that “right.”

Because, however, gayness cannot logically be an unalienable, God-given right (how can God convey a right to a behavior He apparently rejects?), it can be taken away. And I pray for more reasons than you cite that at least DADT and gay marriage will be repealed by a more sensible Congress and Court.


30 posted on 06/28/2011 10:42:20 AM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Is one born heterosexual?

Yes.


31 posted on 06/28/2011 10:44:45 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Gay young men in serious relationships

Notice they very carefully don't say "monogamous" relationship.

Most gay men in "serious relationships" have the equivalent of an extremely "open" heterosexual marriage.

32 posted on 06/28/2011 10:57:41 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

A serious relationship to a “Gay” male is a date that lasts over thirty minutes.


33 posted on 06/28/2011 11:15:51 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


34 posted on 06/28/2011 11:17:40 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Some of the lesser minds have been confounded as well.

Cheers.


35 posted on 06/28/2011 11:21:15 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; BabaOreally; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

36 posted on 06/28/2011 11:21:21 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW; scripter; trisham; metmom; xzins
A committed heterosexual relationship (even unmarried) typically includes the presumption of monogamy, a committed homosexual relationship typically DOES NOT presume monogamy.
37 posted on 06/28/2011 11:23:41 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

They don’t have to worry about getting pregnant?


38 posted on 06/28/2011 11:27:09 AM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

My first reaction to the article is that it was no surprise to me that monogamous homosexual males practicing “unprotected” sex were six times more likely to have diseases. Why? Because male “gay” sex is already unnatural to begin with. Whether or not they are using condoms is irrelevant.

They may avoid some infections by using a condom, but let’s face it - inserting a foreign “object” into each other’s rectum is medically and physically dangerous. It is prone to infections as well as tearing inside the membrane wall of the rectum. Why? Because the rectum was not made for sexual activity. The same is also true for heterosexual couples practicing anal “sex”.

This is a no-brainer.


39 posted on 06/28/2011 11:49:55 AM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Well, looking at all the natural catastrophes, diseases like small pox etc., congenital birth defects etc., and other maladies afflicting Man, I'd kinda have to say that God is sadistic.

Nope. Disease etc is because of sin and this is a fallen world. What God created was perfect. Man, through sin, destroyed it. God then gave man a way to live with Him again through Christ. The earth is a place of sorrow because of man's choices.

40 posted on 06/28/2011 11:50:21 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Is one born heterosexual?

Yes. That is man's natural state. Sexual deviancies are caused by environmental factors.

41 posted on 06/28/2011 11:52:15 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

You mean self-absorbed, self-centered, self-serving homosexual men have multiple instances of unprotected sex? Homosexuality is just partner-assisted masturbation.


42 posted on 06/28/2011 11:55:11 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
I actually believe some people are born gay

Homosexuality is a behavior. Is being a thief genetic? A murderer? A pedophile?

If you are born with 9 toes, or some crippling condition, it is not considered ‘normal’.

Having 9 toes is not a behavior.

43 posted on 06/28/2011 11:55:18 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
That said you win the lottery when you get HIV - the prize? A LIFETIME of full Social Security benefits - no questions asked - for as long as you live...

This isn't true. A family friend died of Aids because he couldn't afford the medication and his kidney's shut down. The government did NOT pay for it.

44 posted on 06/28/2011 11:57:17 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Sexual deviancies are caused by environmental factors

Wow.....and I thought alcohol was to blame.

45 posted on 06/28/2011 12:00:14 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

re: “Well, looking at all the natural catastrophes, diseases like small pox etc., congenital birth defects etc., and other maladies afflicting Man, I’d kinda have to say that God is sadistic.”

Ok, so you’re conclusion is that all natural catastrophes and diseases, birth defects, etc. must be laid at God’s feet because if “He” exists, then a loving “God” wouldn’t allow such things, and, if “He” does exist, and allows such things to happen, then you’ve decided that the only possible, reasonable conclusion is that “He” cannot be good or loving and must therefore be “sadistic”.

Beside the fact that you have apparantly brushed aside the many thoughtful Christian thinkers over the ages who have attempted to give answers and meaning to the problem of suffering and evil -

Then, how do you as an atheist (I’m making this assumption, so if I’m wrong, please correct me) account for evil and what comfort can you give those who are enduring suffering and catastrophes?


46 posted on 06/28/2011 12:04:58 PM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

You can be snide if you like but Dean Hamer and Simon LeVay have both stated that homosexuality is not genetic. The press simply chooses to ignore them. Hamer is a homosexual geneticist.


47 posted on 06/28/2011 12:05:51 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
but Dean Hamer and Simon LeVay have both stated that homosexuality is not genetic

So what? Hundreds of scientists say that global warming is man made, does that make it true?

48 posted on 06/28/2011 12:24:04 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Nope. Disease etc is because of sin and this is a fallen world. What God created was perfect. Man, through sin, destroyed it. God then gave man a way to live with Him again through Christ. The earth is a place of sorrow because of man's choices.

How could anyone's (bad) behavior have a causal effect upon earthquakes, tidal waves, tornadoes, and such?

How could committing a sin have an effect upon plate tectonics, etc.?

In the event that you say that it "simply can" - then I'd ask: Is this principle (sin -> dislocation of tectonic plates) still valid today?

Regards,

49 posted on 06/28/2011 12:24:11 PM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DonkeyBonker
Your god may be a sadist. My God is not the author of that.

Are you saying that you are a polytheist??!!

Regards,

50 posted on 06/28/2011 12:25:32 PM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson