To: GonzoII
I’d rather have this decided in legislation.
One judge says this, the other one says that. Nothing gets decided.
6 posted on
06/28/2011 12:10:30 PM PDT by
VanDeKoik
(1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
To: VanDeKoik
It WAS legislated that the language be included. The judgement is that the language is accurate and not misleading.
7 posted on
06/28/2011 12:15:30 PM PDT by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To: VanDeKoik
"Id rather have this decided in legislation." It was and the judge backed it. The way things aught to be when legislation is commonsensible.
8 posted on
06/28/2011 12:18:18 PM PDT by
GonzoII
(Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
To: VanDeKoik
Id rather have this decided in legislation. That is exactly what happened. The judge upheld the legislation.
9 posted on
06/28/2011 12:20:06 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: VanDeKoik
Id rather have this decided in legislation.It is decided by neither legislatures or judges, it is simple biological fact. And it can be found in any embryology text. Human life begins at conception. That is the science of the matter.
10 posted on
06/28/2011 12:21:27 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: VanDeKoik
"Id rather have this decided in legislation."What "this" conception? If that is what you are referring to, you're a bit too late on that one buddy, God already decided it.
33 posted on
06/28/2011 1:09:52 PM PDT by
zerosix
(native sunflower)
To: VanDeKoik
It’s a law, created by the legislature and signed by the governor.
48 posted on
06/28/2011 4:30:43 PM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson